1.Cytological features of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma in situ of the lung: a case report
Misa TAKAHASHI ; Seiya HOMMA ; Chisato SETOGUCHI ; Yoko UMEZAWA ; Atsuhiko SAKAMOTO
Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine 2025;59(3):195-200
Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) are generally treated as different lesions, depending on the differences in lesion size and histological findings. However, these differences are not absolute; thus, AAH and AIS are often difficult to distinguish. Moreover, whether AAH and AIS can be regarded as different lesions remains unknown because cytological specimens, especially those of AAH, are rare. In this study, we examined these uncommon cytological specimens and compared the cytological findings between AAH and AIS. We observed many common cytological features with no obvious differences between AAH and AIS. These findings suggest that these two distinct lesions can be grouped into a single category. Therefore, we propose creating a new cytological category.
2.Cytological features of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma in situ of the lung: a case report
Misa TAKAHASHI ; Seiya HOMMA ; Chisato SETOGUCHI ; Yoko UMEZAWA ; Atsuhiko SAKAMOTO
Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine 2025;59(3):195-200
Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) are generally treated as different lesions, depending on the differences in lesion size and histological findings. However, these differences are not absolute; thus, AAH and AIS are often difficult to distinguish. Moreover, whether AAH and AIS can be regarded as different lesions remains unknown because cytological specimens, especially those of AAH, are rare. In this study, we examined these uncommon cytological specimens and compared the cytological findings between AAH and AIS. We observed many common cytological features with no obvious differences between AAH and AIS. These findings suggest that these two distinct lesions can be grouped into a single category. Therefore, we propose creating a new cytological category.
3.Cytological features of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma in situ of the lung: a case report
Misa TAKAHASHI ; Seiya HOMMA ; Chisato SETOGUCHI ; Yoko UMEZAWA ; Atsuhiko SAKAMOTO
Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine 2025;59(3):195-200
Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) are generally treated as different lesions, depending on the differences in lesion size and histological findings. However, these differences are not absolute; thus, AAH and AIS are often difficult to distinguish. Moreover, whether AAH and AIS can be regarded as different lesions remains unknown because cytological specimens, especially those of AAH, are rare. In this study, we examined these uncommon cytological specimens and compared the cytological findings between AAH and AIS. We observed many common cytological features with no obvious differences between AAH and AIS. These findings suggest that these two distinct lesions can be grouped into a single category. Therefore, we propose creating a new cytological category.
4.The actual condition of patients treated by acupuncture in Ibaragi Prefecture.
Shigeru KAMIYAMA ; Hiroshi IWATUKI ; Fumi ODA ; Keiji KASUYA ; Masaoshi SATO ; Ryuji SEKI ; Haruo TAKAHASHI ; Shigeo TOKARI ; Misa TSUKADA ; Tsuneyoshi TOMIZAWA ; Teruo NANAKAWA ; Hiroshi NANAKAWA ; Hiroaki HASHIMOTO ; Muneo HIRASAWA ; Noboru FUJIEDA ; Shigeyoshi HORIGUCHI ; Uichi YAMADA ; Toshikazu MIYAMOTO ; Hideo KOBAYASHI ; Hidetoshi MORI ; Kazushi NISHIJO
Journal of the Japan Society of Acupuncture and Moxibustion 1987;37(2):145-151
We investigated the actual condition of patients treated by acupuncture and moxibution in Ibaragi Prefecture.
Subjects were 1823 patients (846 men, 977 women) under the treatment of 14 acupuncture clinics in September to November, 1985.
We prepared the evaluated list that consisted of 11 levels of activities of daily life and 8 degrees of pain.
In every treatment, we wrote down the patient's clinical progress in relation with the list.
The following results were obtained
1. There were many patients in thier forties and fifties.
2. There were many patients who received only one treatment.
3. The chief complaints were low back pains (509 patients), shoulder discomfort (273) knee joint pain (132), etc.
4. Most of the patients could still go on with thier daily lives in spite of the pains.
5. The effects of treatment were rated as follows; better 69.5%, no change 23.9%, worse 5.9%.