1.Predictive value of anti-Mullerian hormone levels in serum and follicle fluid for IVF-ET outcomes in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome.
Xin CHEN ; Minna YIN ; Desheng YE ; Yuxia HE ; Shiling CHEN
Journal of Southern Medical University 2013;33(4):546-549
OBJECTIVETo investigate the association of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels in the follicular fluid and serum with the outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycles in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).
METHODSSerum and follicular fluid samples were obtained from 30 patients with PCOS and 34 healthy women (control) undergoing IVF/ICSI-ET in our center between October, 2007 and January, 2008. All the subjects received treatment with long luteal-phase down-regulation and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol in IVF cycles, and their clinical characteristics were analyzed. The AMH levels in the serum and follicles fluid samples collected on the day of oocyte retrieval were assayed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit.
RESULTSThe two groups showed no significant differences in the mean age, baseline levels of sex hormones, rate of high-quality embryos, implantation rate, pregnancy rate, abortion rate or ongoing pregnancy rate (P>0.05). Despite a significantly lower total gonadotropin dose, PCOS group had a significantly greater number of antral follicles than the control group (P<0.05). The recovery rates of oocytes in PCOS group were significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). AMH levels in the serum and follicle fluid was significantly higher in PCOS group than in the control group (P<0.05), and in both groups, AMH levels in the follicular fluid were significantly higher in pregnant women than in non-pregnant women (P<0.05). AMH level in the follicular fluid was significantly correlated with the implantation rate in both PCOS and control groups (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONAMH level in the serum and follicle fluid on the day of oocyte retrieval is predictive of the treatment outcome of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in POCS patients but not of pregnancy outcomes after IVF-ET.
Adult ; Anti-Mullerian Hormone ; blood ; metabolism ; Case-Control Studies ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; methods ; Follicular Fluid ; metabolism ; Humans ; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome ; blood ; metabolism ; therapy ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome
2.Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of elective single versus double cleavage-stage embryo transfer
Ling SUN ; Zhiheng CHEN ; Minna YIN ; Yu DENG ; Jun LIU
Journal of Southern Medical University 2017;37(4):512-516
Objective To compare the pregnancy and obstetric outcomes in elective single versus two cleavage-stage embryo transfer. Methods Fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfer cycles between January, 2014 and October, 2015 were reviewed, including 39 single embryo transfer (eSET) cycles and 200 double embryo transfer (DET) cycles. The clinical pregnancy rates, implantation rates, multiple pregnancy rates, live birth rate, and obstetric outcomes (gestational age, preterm delivery rate and mean birth weight) were compared between the two groups. Results The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The estradiol level on the day of trigger and the oocyte number were significantly higher in eSET group than in DET group (10654.4 pmol/L vs 8284.2 pmol/L and 8.4 vs 7.0, respectively). No significant difference was found in the pregnancy rate (56.4% vs 66.0%) or live birth rate (48.7% vs 51.5%) between the two groups, and their implantation rates differed significantly (56.4% vs 37.8%). No multiple pregnancies occurred in eSET group while the rate of multiple pregnancies was 22.7% in DET group. The gestational age and mean birth weight were significantly higher in eSET group (P<0.05), and the preterm delivery rate after DET was nearly three times of that after eSET, although this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions Elective single embryo transfer can be performed without compromising the live birth rates. Multiple pregnancy rates can be significantly reduced with eSET, which also results in a higher chance of delivering a term singleton live birth compared with DET.
3.Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of elective single versus double cleavage-stage embryo transfer
Ling SUN ; Zhiheng CHEN ; Minna YIN ; Yu DENG ; Jun LIU
Journal of Southern Medical University 2017;37(4):512-516
Objective To compare the pregnancy and obstetric outcomes in elective single versus two cleavage-stage embryo transfer. Methods Fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfer cycles between January, 2014 and October, 2015 were reviewed, including 39 single embryo transfer (eSET) cycles and 200 double embryo transfer (DET) cycles. The clinical pregnancy rates, implantation rates, multiple pregnancy rates, live birth rate, and obstetric outcomes (gestational age, preterm delivery rate and mean birth weight) were compared between the two groups. Results The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The estradiol level on the day of trigger and the oocyte number were significantly higher in eSET group than in DET group (10654.4 pmol/L vs 8284.2 pmol/L and 8.4 vs 7.0, respectively). No significant difference was found in the pregnancy rate (56.4% vs 66.0%) or live birth rate (48.7% vs 51.5%) between the two groups, and their implantation rates differed significantly (56.4% vs 37.8%). No multiple pregnancies occurred in eSET group while the rate of multiple pregnancies was 22.7% in DET group. The gestational age and mean birth weight were significantly higher in eSET group (P<0.05), and the preterm delivery rate after DET was nearly three times of that after eSET, although this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions Elective single embryo transfer can be performed without compromising the live birth rates. Multiple pregnancy rates can be significantly reduced with eSET, which also results in a higher chance of delivering a term singleton live birth compared with DET.
4.Comparison of different critical care scoring systems in prognosis evaluation of heat stroke
Li CHENG ; Delin LIU ; Minna WANG ; Xiaoxue YIN ; Yuan LIU ; Wei LIU ; Qifeng ZHANG ; Gang YE
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases 2020;38(6):456-459
Objective:To evaluate the prognostic value of different critical care scoring systems in 28-day survival rate of patients with heat stroke.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 71 patients with heat stroke admitted to the department of emergency medicine of Beijing Luhe Hospital. Capital Medical University from July 2015 to September 2018. The general information and the worst values of vital signs and related pathophysiological indicators within 24 hours were collected and the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) , multiple organ dysfunction (MODS) , simplified acute physiological scoreⅡ (SAPS Ⅱ) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ (APACHE Ⅱ) were calculated. The patients were divided into the survival group ( n=45) and the non-survival group ( n=26) according to 28-day prognosis, and the clinical data and scores of the two groups were compared.The ROC curve was drawn to analyze the evaluation value of each scoring system on the survival rate of patients at 28-day. Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot the survival curve of patients. Results:There were no significant differences in age, sex, vital signs and laboratory parameters between two groups ( P>0.05) . In non-survival patients, SOFA, SAPS Ⅱ, APACHE Ⅱ scores were significantly elevated in the survival group ( P<0.05) . ROC curve analysis showed that the area under ROC curve (AUC) of SOFA score for predicting 28-day survival rate was the highest, which was significantly higher than the APACHE Ⅱ, SAPS Ⅱ, MODS score. When the best cut-off value of SOFA score was 9.0, the sensitivity was 84.6%, and the specificity was 71.1%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that 28-day survival rate after hospital discharge in patients with SOFA score<9 ( n=27) was significantly higher than that in patients with SOFA score ≥9.0 (χ 2=1.0, P<0.01) . Conclusion:SOFA, APACHE Ⅱ, SAPS Ⅱ on admission have been proved to have good prognostic ability to predict 28-day prognosis in heat stroke patients. Among them, SOFA score system has more accurate prediction value.
5.Comparison of different critical care scoring systems in prognosis evaluation of heat stroke
Li CHENG ; Delin LIU ; Minna WANG ; Xiaoxue YIN ; Yuan LIU ; Wei LIU ; Qifeng ZHANG ; Gang YE
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases 2020;38(6):456-459
Objective:To evaluate the prognostic value of different critical care scoring systems in 28-day survival rate of patients with heat stroke.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 71 patients with heat stroke admitted to the department of emergency medicine of Beijing Luhe Hospital. Capital Medical University from July 2015 to September 2018. The general information and the worst values of vital signs and related pathophysiological indicators within 24 hours were collected and the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) , multiple organ dysfunction (MODS) , simplified acute physiological scoreⅡ (SAPS Ⅱ) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ (APACHE Ⅱ) were calculated. The patients were divided into the survival group ( n=45) and the non-survival group ( n=26) according to 28-day prognosis, and the clinical data and scores of the two groups were compared.The ROC curve was drawn to analyze the evaluation value of each scoring system on the survival rate of patients at 28-day. Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot the survival curve of patients. Results:There were no significant differences in age, sex, vital signs and laboratory parameters between two groups ( P>0.05) . In non-survival patients, SOFA, SAPS Ⅱ, APACHE Ⅱ scores were significantly elevated in the survival group ( P<0.05) . ROC curve analysis showed that the area under ROC curve (AUC) of SOFA score for predicting 28-day survival rate was the highest, which was significantly higher than the APACHE Ⅱ, SAPS Ⅱ, MODS score. When the best cut-off value of SOFA score was 9.0, the sensitivity was 84.6%, and the specificity was 71.1%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that 28-day survival rate after hospital discharge in patients with SOFA score<9 ( n=27) was significantly higher than that in patients with SOFA score ≥9.0 (χ 2=1.0, P<0.01) . Conclusion:SOFA, APACHE Ⅱ, SAPS Ⅱ on admission have been proved to have good prognostic ability to predict 28-day prognosis in heat stroke patients. Among them, SOFA score system has more accurate prediction value.
6. Prognostic value of arterial blood lactate for patients with cardiogenic shock receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Delin LIU ; Yuguang WANG ; Minna WANG ; Yuan LIU ; Li CHENG ; Qifeng ZHANG ; Xiaoxue YIN ; Wei LIU ; Gang YE
Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2019;35(10):617-622
Objective:
To investigate the prognostic value of arterial blood lactate for patients with cardiogenic shock receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO).
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was conducted. Twenty-three patients diagnosed with cardiogenic shock receiving veno-arterial(V-A) ECMO admitted to department of Emergency Intensive Care Unit(EICU) of Beijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from January 2017 to December 2018 were enrolled.
Results:
There were 10 cases in the survival group and 13 cases in the death group. Compared with survival group, APACHE-Ⅱ score was higher, CRRT applied higher percentage, PH and oxygenation index was worse in the death group(