1.Efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic neoplasms: a report of 258 cases
Xiang ZHANG ; Yongyi ZENG ; Minhui CHI ; Jinhua ZENG ; Jingfeng LIU
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery 2014;13(3):198-201
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy.Methods The clinical data of 258 patients who received laparoscopic hepatectomy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from March 2010 to January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed.There were 196 patients with primary hepatic cancer,45 with hepatic hemangioma,13 with hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia,2 with hepatic metastatic cancer,1 with carcinoma of gallbladder and 1 with hepatic hamartoma.All patients were followed up via phone call or out-patient examination till March 2013.Results A total of 142 patients received single hepatic segmentectomy,98 received multiple hepatic segmentectomy,18 received multiple lesions resection.Fifty-one patients received hepatic tumorectomy + cholecystectomy.All the operations were successfully done under laparoscope without conversion to the open surgery.The mean tumor diameter and the operation time were (5 ± 3) cm (range,1.0-11.5 cm) and (113 ± 56) minutes (range,50-310 minutes),respectively.Intraoperative hepatic portal occlusion was performed on 122 patients,and the time for hepatic portal occlusion was (15 ± 7)minutes.The volume of intraoperative blood loss was (211 ± 195)mL (range,10-650 mL),and blood transfusion was not needed.The capsule of the tumor was complete.The distance between the resection margin and the malignant tumor was above 1.5 cm,and there was no residual tumor in the resection margin.The hepatic function was back to the normal level in 1 week after the operation,and no patient had hepatic failure.The duration of postoperative hospital stay was (7.2 ± 1.3)days (range,5-10 days).One patient was complicated with bile leakage,6 with slight peritoneal effusion,and other patients had no postoperative complications.The rate of follow-up was 91.47% (236/258),and the time of follow-up was (16 ± 10) months.A total of 199 patients with malignant hepatic tumors were followed up.During the follow-up,180 patients had tumor-free survival; 18 patients had postoperative tumor recurrence; 1 patient had omental metastasis and received surgical resection.Thirty-seven patients with benign hepatic tumor survived without complication during the follow-up.Conclusion Laparoscopic hepatectomy is effective for the treatment of hepatic tumors.Multiple hepatic inflow occlusion under laparoscope in a short time may improve the safety of surgery,without prolonging the recovery time of patients.
2.Value of a virtual liver surgery planning system in predicting hepatic dysfunction after hepatectomy for liver cancer
Kecan LIN ; Jingfeng LIU ; Jinhua ZENG ; Minhui CHI ; Yongyi ZENG ; Aimin HUANG
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery 2012;11(2):116-119
Objective To calculate the residoal liver volume using a virtaal liver surgery planning system,and to investigate the value of standardized estimated liver remnant volume ratio (STELR) in prcdicting hepatic dysfunction after hepatectomy.MethodsThe clinical data of 76 patients with primary liver cancer who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from April 2007 to October 2011 were retrospectivcly analyzed.The virtual resection and residual liver volume measurements were carried out using Liv 1.0 software.The value of STELR in predicting hepatic dysfunction was assessed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.Effects of different risk factors on postoperative hepatic dysfunction were analyzed using univariate analysis of variance and multivariate Logistic regression models. Results The mean residual liver volumes predicted by the software and resected during operation were (489 ± 206)ml and (459 ± 199 )ml,respectively,with a positive correlation between predicted and actual resection volumes (r =0.916,P < 0.05).Of the 76 patients,48 had mild hepatic dysfunction,19 had moderate hepatic dysfunction and 9 had severe hepatic dysfunction.A critical STELR of 53% was associated with severe hepatic dysfunction.Severe hepatic dysfunction was detected in 2 out of 59 (3%) patients with STELR ≥ 53% and 7 out of 17 (41%) patients with STELR < 53%,which represented a significant difference ( x2 =5.085,P < 0.05 ).The result of univariate analysis revealed that STEL,R,operating time,intraoperative blood loss were significant prognostic indicators for severe hepatic dysfunction ( F =7.227,8.630,13.809,P <0.05).Multivariate Logistic regession revealed that STELR was a significant independent predictor of severe hepatic dysfunction ( Wald =6.675,P < 0.05 ).Conclusion The likelihood of severe hepatic dysfunction after hepatectomy can be predicted by STELR.
3.Comparative clinical study of laparoscopic versus open liver resection in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Qiyu CHI ; Zheng SHI ; Shangeng WENG ; Yansong ZHENG ; Minhui CHI ; Mingzhi YANG ; Zhibo ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics 2018;37(9):999-1003
Objective To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods Twenty-nine elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and 58 elderly patients receiving open liver resection (OLR) for HCC were included from January 2013 to December 2015 in our department of Fujian Medical University. Two groups were 1:2 matched for gender ,tumor numbers ,and operative procedure.Besides ,general clinical data ,intraoperative data ,postoperative recovery ,and postoperative survival were compared. Results The postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the LLR group [(9.1±3.8)days]thanintheOLRgroup[(11.8±5.1)days](t= -2.66,P<0.05).Theincidence of portal triad clamping was lower in the LLR group than in the OLR group (34.5% vs.60.3% ,χ2 =5.18 ,P<0.05). The removal time of abdominal drainage tube was earlier in the LLR group (4.18 ± 1.94)days than in the OLR group (5.4 ± 2.1)days (t= -2.48 ,P<0.05). The overall survival (OS) showed no difference (37.08 months vs.38.72 months ,t=0.72 ,P=0.789). The disease-free survival (DFS) showed no difference (29.00 months vs.27.49 months ,t=0.53 ,P=0.467). Conclusions LLR in elderly patients with HCC can achieve the same long-term outcome as the conventional open hepatectomy ,and LLR has better short-term outcomes with obvious advantages of minimal invasion.