The prognosis of pancreatic cancer is very poor,40％-50％ of patients have liver metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis,and only 15％-20％ of patients have the chance of surgical resection.At present,there is no consensus on the treatment strategy of pancreatic cancer with simultaneous liver metastasis.Surgeons are still looking forward to surgical resection for patients with longer survival time.The application of neoadjuvant therapy and radiofrequency ablation may bring new breakthroughs in the treatment of pancreatic cancer with simultaneous liver metastasis.This article reviews the surgical,neoadjuvant and palliative treatment of pancreatic cancer with simultaneous liver metastasis.

At present, the medical system vigorously promotes multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment model(MDT), and the timing of liver surgery for synchronous colorectal cancer with liver metastasis(sCRLM) is the focus of expert discussion. The same sCRLM case in different hospital or the different experts is likely to be a different treatment. On the one hand, that reflects the individualized characteristics of MDT. But on the other hand, it also reflects the lack of objective evaluation tools in sCRLM. The purpose of this study is to review the commonly used scoring tools of sCRLM, and to discuss the controversies of simultaneous or staged surgery for liver metastases, so as to inspire the clinical practice in this field.

Advances in surgical techniques have improved the precision and safety of liver surgery.However,there are still a large number of patients diagnosed unresectable at the first time and recurrence after liver surgery is universal.It is a tough challenge to prolong survival time of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).The authors' center has made several attempts to improve 5-year survival of HCC patients.Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been emphasized to improve surgical efficiency for patients with resectable HCC and multidisciplinary support has been emphasized to prolong survival time for unresectable HCC.Guideline for ERAS of Hepatectomy in West China Hospital of Sichuan University is conducted in the authors' center aimed to shorten duration of hospital stay and strengthen interdisciplinary coordination after repeated clinical practice.Patients with advanced HCC can achieve survival benefits from recent breakthroughs in radiotherapy,molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy.The authors in this article have introduced their clinical experience of ERAS in hepatic surgery,reviewed advances in multidisciplinary support and comprehensive treatment of HCC,discussed whole processing management of HCC.

Objective:To investigate the safety of minimally invasive liver resection for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated with portal hypertension.Methods:The propensity score matching and retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 807 patients with resectable HCC who underwent minimally invasive liver resection in 8 medical centers, including Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Affiliated with the Zhejiang University School of Medicine et al, from June 2011 to November 2022 were collected. There were 670 males and 137 females, aged 58(50,66)years. Of the 807 patients, 173 cases with portal hypertension were divided into the portal hypertension group, and 634 cases without portal hypertension were divided into the non-portal hypertension group. Observation indicators: (1) propensity score matching and comparison of general data of patients between the two groups after matching; (2) intraoperative and post-operative situations; (3) subgroup analysis. Propensity score matching was done by the 1:1 nearest neighbor matching method, with the caliper setting as 0.001. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M( Q1, Q3), and comparison between groups was conducted using the rank sum test. Count data were described as absolute numbers, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Comparison of ordinal data was constructed using the non-parameter rank sun test. Results:(1) Propensity score matching and comparison of general data of patients between the two groups after matching. Of the 807 patients, 268 cases were successfully matched, including 134 cases in the portal hypertension group and 134 cases in the non-portal hypertension group. The elimination of the tumor diameter and robot-assisted surgery confounding bias ensured comparability between the two groups after propensity score matching. (2) Intraoperative and postoperative situations. The occlusion time of porta hepatis, cases with intraoperative blood transfusion, cases with postoperative complication, cases with complication >Ⅱ grade of Clavien-Dindo classification, cases of Clavien-Dindo classification as Ⅰ grade, Ⅱ grade, Ⅲ grade, Ⅳ grade, cases with liver related complication were 27.0(15.0,43.0)minutes, 33, 55, 15, 13, 29, 14, 1, 37 in the portal hypertension group, versus 35.0(22.0,60.0)minutes, 17, 25, 5, 14, 9, 4, 1, 13 in the non-portal hypertension group, showing significant differences in the above indicators between the two groups ( Z=-2.15, χ2=6.30, 16.39, 4.38, 20.72, 14.16, P<0.05). (3) Subgroup analysis. Results of subgroups analysis showed that in cases with major live resection, the operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative hospital stay were 243.5(174.6,296.3)minutes, 200.0(150.0,600.0)mL, 7.5(6.0,13.0)days in the portal hypertension group, versus 270.0(180.0,314.5)minutes, 200.0 (75.0,450.0)mL, 7.0(5.5,10.0)days in the non-portal hypertension group, showing no significant difference in the above indicators between the two groups ( Z=-0.54, -1.73, -0.92, P>0.05). In cases with non-major live resection, the operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative hospital stay were 170.0(120.0,227.5)minutes, 100.0(50.0,200.0)mL, 8.0(5.0,10.0)days in the portal hypertension group, versus 170.0(120.0,227.5)minutes, 100.0(50.0,200.0)mL, 7.0(5.5,9.0)days in the non-portal hypertension group, showing no significant difference in the above indicators between the two groups ( Z=-1.39, -0.10, 1.05, P>0.05). In cases with anatomical liver resection, the operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative hospital stay were 210.0(150.0,285.0)minutes, 150.0(50.0,200.0)mL, 8.0(6.0,9.3)days in the portal hypertension group, versus 225.5(146.3,306.8)minutes, 100.0(50.0,250.0)mL, 7.0(6.0,9.0)days in the non-portal hypertension group, showing no significant difference in the above indica-tors between the two groups ( Z=-0.75, -0.26, -0.91, P>0.05). In cases with non-anatomical liver resection, the operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative hospital stay were 173.5(120.0,231.5)minutes, 175.0(50.0,300.0)mL, 7.0(5.0,11.0)days in the portal hyper-tension group, versus 186.0(123.0,262.5)minutes, 100.0(50.0,200.0)mL, 7.0(5.0,9.5)days in the non-portal hypertension group, showing no significant difference in the above indicators between the two groups ( Z=-0.97, -1.12, -0.98, P>0.05). Conclusion:Minimally invasive liver resection or even major liver resection is safe and feasible for screened HCC patients complicated with portal hyper-tension, but attention should be paid to the prevention and treatment of postoperative complications.