Objective To evaluate the role of poly( ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 ( PARP-1) in lung ischemia-reperfusion ( I/R ) injury in rats and the relationship with autophagy. Methods Twenty-four clean-grade healthy male Sprague-Dawley rats, aged 8-12 weeks, weighing 200-240 g, were divided into 3 groups (n=8 each) using a random number table method: sham operation group (S group), lung I/R group ( I/R group) and lung I/R plus PARP-1 inhibitor PJ34 group ( I/R+PJ34 group) . The chest was only opened without clamping the left hilum of lung in group S. Lung I/R injury model was established by clam-ping the left hilum of lung for 45 min followed by 120 min reperfusion in I/R and I/R+PJ34 groups. PJ3410 mg/kg was intraperitoneally injected at 30 min before ischemia in group I/R+PJ34, while the equal volume of normal saline was injected in S and I/R groups. The rats were sacrificed at the end of reperfusion, and lungs were removed for microscopic examination of the pathological changes ( with a light microscope) which were scored and for determination of wet to dry weight ratio ( W/D ratio) , cell apoptosis ( by TUNEL) , ex-pression of PARP-1 activity markers ( PAR) , Bcl-2, Bax, microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3Ⅰ ( LC3-Ⅰ) , LC3-Ⅱ and Beclin-1 ( using Western blot ) . The apoptosis index, Bcl-2/Bax ratio and LC3-Ⅱ/LC3-Ⅰ ratio were calculated. Results Compared with S group, the W/D ratio, pathological scores, apoptosis index and LC3-Ⅱ/LC3-Ⅰ ratio were significantly increased, the expression of PAR and Beclin-1 was up-regulated, and Bcl-2/Bax ratio was decreased in I/R and I/R+PJ34 groups (P＜0. 05). Compared with I/R group, the W/D ratio, pathological scores, apoptosis index, and LC3-Ⅱ/LC3-Ⅰratio were significantly decreased, the expression of PAR and Beclin-1 was down-regulated, and Bcl-2/Bax ratio was increased in I/R+PJ34 group ( P＜0. 05) . Conclusion PARP-1 activation is involved in lung I/R inju-ry in rats, and the mechanism may be related to increasing autophagy and inducing cell apoptosis.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of remimazolam-alfentanil-mivacurium for fiberoptic bronchoscopy.Methods:A total of 100 patients of both sexes, aged 18-64 yr, with body mass index of 18.5-28.0 kg/m 2, of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ-Ⅲ, scheduled for elective fiberoptic bronchoscopy, were divided into 2 groups ( n=50 each) using a random number table method: remimazolam-alfentanil-mivacurium group (group R) and propofol-alfentanil-mivacurium group (group P). Oxygen was inhaled by mask, and alfentanil 10 μg/kg was slowly injected intravenously in advance.One minute later, remimazolam 0.2 mg/kg was injected intravenously in group R, propofol 1.5-2.0 mg/kg was injected in group P until loss of consciousness, and mivacurium 0.14 mg/kg was then injected intravenously in 2 groups.When the bispectral index value was 40-60, mechanical ventilation was performed after laryngeal mask was placed by the same anesthesiologist.During the maintenance of anesthesia, remimazolam 1 mg·kg -1·h -1 was infused intravenously in group R, propofol 4-6 mg ·kg -1·h -1 was infused intravenously in group P, and mivacurium was intermittently injected in both groups to maintain muscle relaxation.Before induction (T 0), when the laryngeal mask was placed (T 1), immediately when fiber bronchoscope reached juga (T 2), at 10 min after the surgery (T 3), at the end of the surgery (T 4) and when patients regained consciousness (T 5), blood pressure (BP), (HR), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO 2), breathing at the end of the CO 2 partial pressure (P ETCO 2), BIS values and Modified Observer's Assessment/Alertness and Sedation (MOAA/S) score were recorded.The time from beginning of anesthesia to beginning of examination, total examination time, the time from the end of administration to laryngal mask airway removal, the time to recovery of spontaneous breathing and the time from emergence to discharge from postanesthesia care unit (PACU) were recorded.The occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative adverse reactions was recorded. Results:There was no significant difference in SpO 2, P ETCO 2, BIS values and MOAA/S score at each time pint and the time from beginning of anesthesia to beginning of examination, the time to recovery of spontaneous breathing and the time from emergence time to discharge from PACU between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). Compared with group P, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were significantly increased at T 1, T 3 and T 4, the time from the end of administration to laryngal mask airway removal was prolonged, the incidence of intraoperative hypotension, postoperative cough and total adverse reactions were decreased in group R ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Remimazolam-alfentanil-mivacurium produces better efficacy than propofol-alfentanil-mivacurium for fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

Objective:To compare the efficacy of mivacurium versus cisatracurium in patients undergoing painless fiberoptic bronchoscopy.Methods:A total of 100 patients of both sexes, aged 18-64 yr, of American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I or Ⅱ, scheduled for elective fiberoptic bronchoscopy were divided into 2 groups ( n=50 each) using a random number table method: mivacurium group (M group) and cisatracurium group (C group). Mivacurium 0.15 mg/kg was injected intravenously in group M, and cisatracurium 0.1 mg/kg was injected intravenously in group C. The onset time of neuromuscular block (ThD95), the duration of neuromuscular block (TOFR25), recovery index (RI), recovery time of autonomous respiration, extubation time and time of discharge from postanesthesia care unit (PACU) were recorded.The occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative adverse reactions and complications were recorded.The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and SpO 2 at restlessness at 10 min after entering the operating room (T 1), at loss of consciousness (T 2), when laryngeal mask airway was inserted (T 3), at the end of surgery (T 4), when laryngel mask airway was removed (T 5), and when the patients left the operating room (T 6). Results:Compared with group C, TOFR25, RI, recovery time of autonomous respiration, extubation time and time of discharge from PACU were significantly shortened, the total incidence of adverse reactions was decreased ( P<0.05), and no significant change was found in ThD95 in group M ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in MAP, HR and SpO 2 at each time point between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Mivacurium provides better efficacy than cisatracurium when used for painless fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

Objective:To evaluate the sedative efficacy of S-ketamine combined with propofol for MRI examination in pediatric patients.Methods:One hundred children of both sexes, aged 1-6 yr, weighing 10-30 kg, of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ, who underwent MRI from February to June 2021, were selected and divided into 2 groups ( n=50 each) by a random number table method: propofol group (P group) and S-ketamine plus propofol group (K+ P group). Anesthesia induction: propofol 2.5 mg/kg was intravenously injected in group P, and S-ketamine 0.5 mg/kg and propofol 1.5 mg/kg were intravenously injected in group K+ P.Anesthesia maintenance: propofol 100 μg·kg -1·min -1 was intravenously infused, and the infusion rate of propofol was adjusted to maintain Ramsay sedation score ≥5.Propofol 0.5-1.0 mg/kg was intravenously injected and/or increasing the infusion rate of propofol when moderate and severe movement occurred.The quality of MRI images was evaluated during the examination, and the occurrence and degree of movement, airway-related adverse events (hypoxemia, apnea, upper airway obstruction, hypersalivation), hypotension and bradycardia were recorded.The average infusion rate, consumption of additional propofol for intravenous administration and total consumption of propofol were recorded.The emergence time and time of anesthesia recovery room stay were recorded.The occurrence of adverse events (vomiting, diplopia and agitation) and the parents′ satisfaction with sedative efficacy and recovery were recorded during observation in the recovery room. Results:Compared with group P, the average infusion rate of propofol, total consumption of propofol, airway-related adverse events and incidence of hypotension and bradycardia were significantly decreased ( P<0.05), and no significant change was found in the incidence and degree of body movement, quality of MRI images, emergence time and time of anesthesia recovery room stay and incidence of adverse events during recovery from anesthesia in group K+ P ( P>0.05). Conclusion:S-ketamine combined with propofol can be safely and effectively used in MRI examination in pediatric patients.

Objective:To evaluate the effect of gender factor on efficacy of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in the patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy.Methods:Two hundred patients, aged 18-64 yr, with body mass index of 18-30 kg/m 2, of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classificationⅠor Ⅱ, scheduled for elective gastrointestinal endoscopy, were divided into 2 groups ( n=100 each) according to gender: male group (group M) and female group (group F). Remimazolam 0.2-0.3 mg/kg and alfentanil 5-7 μg/kg were intravenously injected, remimazolam 0.5-0.7 mg·kg -1·h -1 was continuously infused during operation to maintain the modified observer′s assessment of alert/sedation score<3 points, and alfentanil 2 μg/kg was administered when necessary. The consumption of remimazolam and alfentanil, examination time, recovery time and time of post-anesthesia care unit stay were recorded. The satisfaction scores of examination physicians and patients were recorded. The occurrence of adverse reactions such as injection pain, intraoperative body movement, respiratory depression, hypotension, bradycardia and hiccups and postoperative dizziness, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, abdominal pain and abdominal distension were recorded. Results:There was no significant difference in the consumption of remimazolam and alfentanil, examination time, recovery time, satisfaction scores of examination physicians and patients between the two groups ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of respiratory depression, hypotension, bradycardia, injection pain, body movement, hiccups, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and fatigue between the two groups ( P>0.05). Compared with group M, the time of post-anesthesia care unit stay was significantly prolonged, and the incidence of postoperative dizziness, nausea and vomiting was increased in group F ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Remimazolam combined with alfentanil provides better efficacy in male patients than in female patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of oral midazolam solution for preoperative sedation in the pediatric outpatients undergoing root canal treatment under general anesthesia.Methods:One hundred and forty-seven pediatric patients of either sex, aged 2-7 yr, weighing 10-30 kg, of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classificationⅠ or Ⅱ, were divided into 3 groups ( n=49 each) using a random number table method: oral midazolam solution group (OM group), midazolam injection group (M group), and dexmedetomidine group (D group). In OM group, patients received oral midazolam solution at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg along with a placebo (an equivalent amount of normal saline based on body weight) administered via nasal drops. In M group, patients were given oral midazolam injection at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg along with a placebo via nasal drops. In D group, patients were administered a placebo orally along with dexmedetomidine at a dose of 2 μg/kg via nasal drops. The Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC) scores upon entering the operating room, sedation success rates (ICC score ≤ 3), drug acceptance scores, mask acceptance scores, and separation anxiety scores were recorded. The emergence time, time of stay in postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and occurrence of adverse events such as bradycardia, hypotension, hypoxemia, and laryngospasm during surgery and in PACU were recorded. Results:A total of 143 pediatric patients were finally included in the study, with 48 cases in OM group, 48 cases in M group and 47 cases in D group. Compared with M and D groups, the ICC scores upon entry to the operating room were significantly decreased, the sedation success rates were increased, drug acceptance scores were increased, separation anxiety scores were decreased, and mask acceptance scores were decreased in OM group ( P<0.05). Compared with D group, the ICC scores upon entry to the operating room were significantly decreased, the sedation success rates were increased, and mask acceptance scores were decreased in M group ( P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the emergence time, time of stay in PACU, and incidence of adverse events during surgery and in PACU among the three groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Oral midazolam solution provides good effect with less adverse reactions when used for preoperative sedation in the pediatric outpatients undergoing root canal treatment under general anesthesia.