No abstract available.
Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea ; Meningitis, Bacterial ; Rhinoplasty

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical manifestations, contact history, and status of tuberculosis contact investigations in school-age children and adolescents with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) at two centers. METHODS: This study was conducted with 54 patients in the age ranging from 10 to 18 years, who were diagnosed with pulmonary TB at the Pusan National University Hospital and Pusan National University Children's Hospital, January 2008 to December 2012. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the patients. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 16 years old; 11 patients were aged 10 to 14 and 43 patients were aged 15 to 18. Among 54 patients, 19 had history of contact with pulmonary TB, 10 had contact with house members (household), and remaining 9 had contact with classmates (non-household). One out of 10 patients who had household contacts and 6 out of 9 patients who had non-household contacts were evaluated with contact investigation after the exposure to pulmonary TB. Among 7 patients who were evaluated with contact investigation, 3 were diagnosed with active pulmonary TB, 1 had latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), and 3 had no evidence of TB or LTBI. The median period of diagnosis after the exposure to active pulmonary TB was 2 years in patients with household contacts and 0.23 years in patients with non-household contacts. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that if the contact investigation conducted properly, it would be helpful for early diagnosis and prevention of pulmonary TB.
Adolescent* ; Busan ; Child* ; Diagnosis ; Early Diagnosis ; Family Characteristics ; Humans ; Latent Tuberculosis ; Medical Records ; Retrospective Studies ; Tuberculosis* ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary*

Objectives: Assessing medical disputes requires both medical and legal expertise, presenting challenges for patients seeking clarity regarding potential malpractice claims. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a chatbot based on a chain-of-thought pipeline using a large language model (LLM) for providing medical dispute counseling and compare its performance with responses from human experts. Methods: Retrospective counseling cases (n = 279) were collected from the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency’s website, from which 50 cases were randomly selected as a validation dataset. The Claude 3.5 Sonnet model processed each counseling request through a five-step chain-of-thought pipeline. Thirty-eight experts evaluated the chatbot’s responses against the original human expert responses, rating them across four dimensions on a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analyses were conducted using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: The chatbot significantly outperformed human experts in quality of information (p < 0.001), understanding and reasoning (p < 0.001), and overall satisfaction (p < 0.001). It also demonstrated a stronger tendency to produce opinion-driven content (p < 0.001). Despite generally high scores, evaluators noted specific instances where the chatbot encountered difficulties. Conclusions A chain-of-thought–based LLM chatbot shows promise for enhancing the quality of medical dispute counseling, outperforming human experts across key evaluation metrics. Future research should address inaccuracies resulting from legal and contextual variability, investigate patient acceptance, and further refine the chatbot’s performance in domain-specific applications.

Objectives: Assessing medical disputes requires both medical and legal expertise, presenting challenges for patients seeking clarity regarding potential malpractice claims. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a chatbot based on a chain-of-thought pipeline using a large language model (LLM) for providing medical dispute counseling and compare its performance with responses from human experts. Methods: Retrospective counseling cases (n = 279) were collected from the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency’s website, from which 50 cases were randomly selected as a validation dataset. The Claude 3.5 Sonnet model processed each counseling request through a five-step chain-of-thought pipeline. Thirty-eight experts evaluated the chatbot’s responses against the original human expert responses, rating them across four dimensions on a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analyses were conducted using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: The chatbot significantly outperformed human experts in quality of information (p < 0.001), understanding and reasoning (p < 0.001), and overall satisfaction (p < 0.001). It also demonstrated a stronger tendency to produce opinion-driven content (p < 0.001). Despite generally high scores, evaluators noted specific instances where the chatbot encountered difficulties. Conclusions A chain-of-thought–based LLM chatbot shows promise for enhancing the quality of medical dispute counseling, outperforming human experts across key evaluation metrics. Future research should address inaccuracies resulting from legal and contextual variability, investigate patient acceptance, and further refine the chatbot’s performance in domain-specific applications.

Objectives: Assessing medical disputes requires both medical and legal expertise, presenting challenges for patients seeking clarity regarding potential malpractice claims. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a chatbot based on a chain-of-thought pipeline using a large language model (LLM) for providing medical dispute counseling and compare its performance with responses from human experts. Methods: Retrospective counseling cases (n = 279) were collected from the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency’s website, from which 50 cases were randomly selected as a validation dataset. The Claude 3.5 Sonnet model processed each counseling request through a five-step chain-of-thought pipeline. Thirty-eight experts evaluated the chatbot’s responses against the original human expert responses, rating them across four dimensions on a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analyses were conducted using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: The chatbot significantly outperformed human experts in quality of information (p < 0.001), understanding and reasoning (p < 0.001), and overall satisfaction (p < 0.001). It also demonstrated a stronger tendency to produce opinion-driven content (p < 0.001). Despite generally high scores, evaluators noted specific instances where the chatbot encountered difficulties. Conclusions A chain-of-thought–based LLM chatbot shows promise for enhancing the quality of medical dispute counseling, outperforming human experts across key evaluation metrics. Future research should address inaccuracies resulting from legal and contextual variability, investigate patient acceptance, and further refine the chatbot’s performance in domain-specific applications.

BACKGROUND: Free-flap surgery and skin grafting can be used to reconstruct large facial defects that may result after skin cancer removal by Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). However, these two methods may produce low postsurgical patient satisfaction with aesthetics, and free-flap surgery may produce an undue burden for the majority of skin cancer patients, who are of advanced age. Hence, the authors examined outcomes of large facial defect reconstruction using multiple flaps. METHODS: Among patients undergoing MMS for skin cancer at Pusan National University Hospital between January 2013 and December 2015, we evaluated 7 patients (2 males, 5 females; average age, 73.14 years) treated for large facial defects from basal cell carcinoma. Based on operative and follow-up records, we investigated the number and type of flaps used, postsurgical complications, and patients' post-surgical satisfaction. RESULTS: Two and 3 types of flaps were used for 5 and 2 patients, respectively. Most frequently used were nasolabial flaps (7 times in 6 patients) and forehead flaps (once in each of 4 patients). The average follow-up period was 14 months, with no complications—including necrosis, hematoma, or wound dehiscence—observed. Post-surgical satisfaction averaged 4.4 out of a maximum of 5 points. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction using two or more flaps for large facial defects after skin cancer removal using MMS produced satisfactory outcomes while preventing aesthetic problems. Practitioners should consider using multiple flaps when choosing a reconstruction method for large facial defects following skin cancer removal.
Busan ; Carcinoma, Basal Cell ; Esthetics ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Forehead ; Hematoma ; Humans ; Male ; Methods ; Mohs Surgery ; Necrosis ; Patient Satisfaction ; Skin Neoplasms* ; Skin Transplantation ; Skin* ; Wounds and Injuries

BACKGROUND: Cases of simultaneous multiple skin cancers in a single patient have become more common. Due to the multiplicity of lesions, reconstruction in such cases is more difficult than after a single lesion is removed. This study presents a series of patients with multiple facial skin cancers, with an analysis of the surgical removal, reconstruction process, and the results observed during follow-up. METHODS: We reviewed 12 patients diagnosed with multiple skin cancers on the face between November 2004 and March 2016. The patients’ medical records were retrospectively reviewed to identify the type of skin cancer, the site of onset, methods of surgical removal and reconstruction, complications, and recurrence during follow-up. RESULTS: Nine patients had a single type of cancer occurring as multiple lesions, while three patients had different skin cancer types that occurred together. A total of 30 cancer sites were observed in the 12 patients. The most common cancer site was the nose. Thirteen defects were reconstructed with a flap, while 18 were reconstructed with skin grafting. The only complication was one case of recurrence of basal cell carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Multiple skin cancers are removed by performing Mohs micrographic surgery or wide excision, resulting in multiple defect sites. The authors emphasize the importance of thoroughly evaluating local lesions surrounding the initially-identified lesions or on other sites when reconstructing a large defect which can not be covered by primary closure. Furthermore, satisfactory results can be obtained by using various methods simultaneously regarding the condition of individual patients, the defect site and size, and the surgeon’s preference.
Carcinoma, Basal Cell ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Medical Records ; Melanoma ; Mohs Surgery ; Nose ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Skin Neoplasms* ; Skin Transplantation ; Skin*

No abstract available.
Agenesis of Corpus Callosum*

No abstract available.
Agenesis of Corpus Callosum*

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and prognostic factors of intramedullary nailing of distal tibia fractures in terms of function and symptoms of the ankle joint. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 22 distal tibial fractures with intramedullary nailing. The mean duration of follow-up was 43 months. We reviewed medical records to describe each case. We measured radiographic parameters such as fracture configuration, arthritic change of the ankle joint and status of reduction. We also assessed clinical results by AOFAS ankle hind foot scoring system, degree of pain by VAS and range of motion to find out prognostic factors for functional result of the ankle joint. RESULTS: Bone healing was obtained in all cases without any wound complications. Mean AOFAS ankle score was 94. There were 4 cases with mild (VAS<3/10) ankle pain and 2 cases with mild limitation of ankle motion. The comminution of fracture had a significant relationship with delayed angular deformity of ankle joint (p=0.032). There was no other significant parameter affecting ankle joint function except the location of nail-end. CONCLUSION: Intramedullary nailing in distal tibia fracture is a safe and effective procedure. But further study may need to evaluate the relationship between the position of nail-end and the function of ankle joint.
Animals ; Ankle ; Ankle Joint ; Congenital Abnormalities ; Follow-Up Studies ; Foot ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary ; Medical Records ; Nails ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Retrospective Studies ; Tibia ; Tibial Fractures