No abstract available.
Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery*

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is considered a safe, appropriate, and minimally invasive approach, and complications after endoscopic microsurgery are rare. We report a case of sepsis and pneumoretroperitoneum after resection of a rectal lateral spreading tumor. The patient presented with rectal mucous discharge. Colonoscopy revealed a rectal lateral spreading tumor. The patient underwent an endoscopic transanal resection of the lesion. He presented with sepsis of the abdominal focus, and imaging tests revealed pneumoretroperitoneum. A new surgical intervention was performed with a loop colostomy. Despite the existence of other reports on pneumoretroperitoneum after transanal endoscopic microsurgery, what draws attention to this case is the association with sepsis.
Colonoscopy ; Colostomy ; Humans ; Microsurgery ; Retropneumoperitoneum* ; Sepsis* ; Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery(TEM) is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of local tumors, especially for the rectal villous adenoma (pT0), polyps with severe dysplasia and in situ carcinoma(pTis). It can also be applied as salvage surgery for incidental carcinoma after colonoscopy as well as in cases of giant villous adenoma. With the introduction of screening colonoscopy, more early polyps will be detected. We should be able to customize our treatment accordingly. On one hand, we want to prevent overkill and on the other hand to avoid under-treatment. This article is aimed to review the development of TEM and discuss its various indications.
Carcinoma in Situ ; Colonoscopy ; Humans ; Polyps ; Rectal Neoplasms ; Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery

No abstract available.
Microsurgery*

No abstract available.
Microsurgery*

No abstract available.
Microsurgery

No abstract available.
Microsurgery

OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluated the accuracies and ease of use of several commonly used microanastomosis training models (synthetic tube, chicken wing, and living rat model). METHODS: A survey was conducted among neurosurgeons and neurosurgery residents at a workshop held in 2009 at the authors' institute. Questions addressed model accuracy (similarity to real vessels and actual procedures) and practicality (availability of materials and ease of application in daily practice). Answers to each question were rated using a 5-point scale. Participants were also asked what types of training methods they would chose to improve their skills and to introduce the topic to other neurosurgeons or neurosurgery residents. RESULTS: Of the 24 participants, 20 (83.3%) responded to the survey. The living rat model was favored for model accuracy (p < 0.001; synthetic tube -0.95 +/- 0.686, chicken wing, 0.15 +/- 0.587, and rat, 1.75 +/- 0.444) and the chicken wing model for practicality (p < 0.001; synthetic tube -1.55 +/- 0.605, chicken wing, 1.80 +/- 0.523, and rat, 1.30 +/- 0.923). All (100%) chose the living rat model for improving their skills, and for introducing the subject to other neurosurgeons or neurosurgery residents, the chicken wing and living rat models were selected by 18 (90%) and 20 (100%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Of 3 methods examined, the chicken wing model was found to be the most practical, but the living rat model was found to represent reality the best. We recommend the chicken wing model to train surgeons who have mastered basic techniques, and the living rat model for experienced surgeons to maintain skill levels.
Animals ; Cerebral Revascularization ; Chickens ; Microsurgery ; Neurosurgery ; Rats ; Wings, Animal

The development of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) during the last 30 years has led to the evolution of the treatment in rectal neoplasms. TEM has revolutionized the technique and outcomes of transanal surgery. To our knowledge, this technique is currently the only one-port system in endoscopic surgery by which a direct endoluminal approach to the target organ by using a natural opening of the body become available. TEM affords the advantage of a less invasive transanal approach with low recurrence rates secondary to a more precise dissection due to enhanced visualization of the surgical field. Currently, TEM represents the standard treatment modality for large rectal adenomas and a surgical option in selected early rectal cancers. Its potential role in the treatment of more invasive cancer in combination with neoadjuvant therapies, and other rectal localized tumors are currently under evaluation. The current trend of TEM is favorable in China. TEM has also been increasingly used in the treatment of rectal neoplasms, but there are many problems in the development of TEM, for example, preoperative assessment is inadequate, patient selection is not precise enough, the surgical procedure is not standardized, etc. These problems require the majority of surgical colleagues to work together to make the standards scientifically and objectively in accordance with the actual situation of our country, so as to promote the healthy development and popularity of TEM in China.
Adenoma ; China ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Patient Selection ; Rectal Neoplasms ; Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery

OBJECTIVETo explore the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in preoperative staging of rectal cancer and to guide the treatment of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) in early rectal cancer.

METHODSClinical data of 80 patients with rectal cancer receiving EUS examination for preoperative staging in our department between June and December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Consistence comparison of EUS preoperative staging and pathological staging was performed to identify the accuracy of EUS preoperative staging. All the patients underwent operation within 1 week after EUS examination. According to preoperative staging, early rectal cancer(Tis or T1N0M0) patients with lesions less 20 cm to anus underwent TEM.

RESULTSThe overall accuracy of EUS for preoperative T stage was 68.8%(55/80), and for T1, T2, T3, T4 was 91.3%(73/80), 83.8%(68/80), 77.5%(62/80), 85.0%(67/80), which had a good consistence with postoperative pathological T staging(Kappa=0.562). The overall accuracy of EUS for preoperative N stage was 52.7%(39/74), and for N0, N1, N2 stage was 64.9%(48/74), 55.4%(41/74), 85.1%(63/74), which had a poor consistence with postoperative pathological N staging(Kappa=0.235). Six patients underwent TEM successfully, with mean operation time 99(65 to 123) min, without intraoperative and postoperative complication, and were discharged 2-3 days after operation. Enteroscope showed good recovery 1 month later. Pathology confirmed that all the lesions were early rectal cancer. During postoperative follow-up of 14.8 (11 to 19) months, there was no local recurrence and distant metastasis.

CONCLUSIONPreoperative EUS has a good accuracy with pathologic T stage, and can guide TEM in early rectal cancer.