1.Galectin-3 Reflects the Echocardiographic Grades of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction.
Uzair ANSARI ; Michael BEHNES ; Julia HOFFMANN ; Michele NATALE ; Christian FASTNER ; Ibrahim EL-BATTRAWY ; Jonas RUSNAK ; Seung Hyun KIM ; Siegfried LANG ; Ursula HOFFMANN ; Thomas BERTSCH ; Martin BORGGREFE ; Ibrahim AKIN
Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2018;38(4):306-315
BACKGROUND: The level of Galectin-3 (Gal-3) protein purportedly reflects an ongoing cardiac fibrotic process and has been associated with ventricular remodeling, which is instrumental in the development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential use of Gal-3 in improved characterization of the grades of diastolic dysfunction as defined by echocardiography. METHODS: Seventy HFpEF patients undergoing routine echocardiography were prospectively enrolled in the present monocentric study. Blood samples for measurements of Gal-3 and amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were collected within 24 hours pre- or post-echocardiographic examination. The classification of patients into subgroups based on diastolic dysfunction grade permitted detailed statistical analyses of the derived data. RESULTS: The Gal-3 serum levels of all patients corresponded to echocardiographic indices, suggesting HFpEF (E/A, P=0.03 and E/E', P=0.02). Gal-3 was also associated with progressive diastolic dysfunction, and increased levels corresponded to the course of disease (P=0.012). Detailed analyses of ROC curves suggested that Gal-3 levels could discriminate patients with grade III diastolic dysfunction (area under the curve [AUC]=0.770, P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Gal-3 demonstrates remarkable effectiveness in the diagnosis of patients suffering from severe grade diastolic dysfunction. Increasing levels of Gal-3 possibly reflect the progressive course of HFpEF, as classified by the echocardiographic grades of diastolic dysfunction.
Classification
;
Diagnosis
;
Echocardiography*
;
Galectin 3*
;
Heart Failure
;
Humans
;
Prospective Studies
;
ROC Curve
;
Ventricular Remodeling
2.Alexithymia, Suicide Ideation and Homocysteine Levels in Drug Naïve Patients with Major Depression: A Study in the “Real World” Clinical Practice
Domenico DE BERARDIS ; Luigi OLIVIERI ; Gabriella RAPINI ; Serena DI NATALE ; Nicola SERRONI ; Michele FORNARO ; Laura ORSOLINI ; Alessandro VALCHERA ; Alessandro CARANO ; Federica VELLANTE ; Paola Annunziata VARASANO ; Gabriella Lucidi PRESSANTI ; Gianluca SERAFINI ; Maurizio POMPILI ; Giovanni MARTINOTTI ; Massimo DI GIANNANTONIO
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 2019;17(2):318-322
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to elucidate relationships between alexithymia, suicide ideation and homocysteine levels in drug-naïve outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Sixty seven outpatients with MDD with melancholic features were evaluated by the means of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS–20), the Scale of Suicide Ideation, and homocysteine levels. RESULTS: Alexithymic subjects showed higher scores on all scales and higher homocysteine levels. Regression analysis shown higher homocysteine levels and TAS-20’ “Difficulty in Describing Feelings” dimension, in turn being associated with higher suicide ideation. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, alexithymic MDD outpatients may characterize for homocysteine dysregulation that may be linked to suicide ideation, regardless depression’ severity. However, study limitations are discussed and must be considered.
Affective Symptoms
;
Depression
;
Depressive Disorder, Major
;
Homocysteine
;
Humans
;
Outpatients
;
Suicidal Ideation
;
Suicide
;
Weights and Measures
3.The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of acute and chronic hemorrhoidal disease
Antonio BRILLANTINO ; Adolfo RENZI ; Pasquale TALENTO ; Luigi BRUSCIANO ; Luigi MARANO ; Maurizio GRILLO ; Mauro Natale MAGLIO ; Fabrizio FORONI ; Alessio PALUMBO ; Maria Laura Sandoval SOTELO ; Luciano VICENZO ; Michele LANZA ; Giovanna FREZZA ; Massimo ANTROPOLI ; Claudio GAMBARDELLA ; Luigi MONACO ; Ilaria FERRANTE ; Domenico IZZO ; Alfredo GIORDANO ; Michele PINTO ; Corrado FANTINI ; Marcello GASPARRINI ; Michele Schiano DI VISCONTE ; Francesca MILAZZO ; Giovanni FERRERI ; Andrea BRAINI ; Umberto COCOZZA ; Massimo PEZZATINI ; Valeria GIANFREDA ; Alberto DI LEO ; Vincenzo LANDOLFI ; Umberto FAVETTA ; Sergio AGRADI ; Giovanni MARINO ; Massimiliano VARRIALE ; Massimo MONGARDINI ; Claudio Eduardo Fernando Antonio PAGANO ; Riccardo Brachet CONTUL ; Nando GALLESE ; Giampiero UCCHINO ; Michele D’AMBRA ; Roberto RIZZATO ; Giacomo SARZO ; Bruno MASCI ; Francesca DA POZZO ; Simona ASCANELLI ; Patrizia LIGUORI ; Angela PEZZOLLA ; Francesca IACOBELLIS ; Erika BORIANI ; Eugenio CUDAZZO ; Francesca BABIC ; Carmelo GEREMIA ; Alessandro BUSSOTTI ; Mario CICCONI ; Antonia Di SARNO ; Federico Maria MONGARDINI ; Antonio BRESCIA ; Leonardo LENISA ; Massimiliano MISTRANGELO ; Matteo ZUIN ; Marta MOZZON ; Alessandro Paolo CHIRIATTI ; Vincenzo BOTTINO ; Antonio FERRONETTI ; Corrado RISPOLI ; Ludovico CARBONE ; Giuseppe CALABRÒ ; Antonino TIRRÒ ; Domenico DE VITO ; Giovanna IOIA ; Giovanni Luca LAMANNA ; Lorenzo ASCIORE ; Ettore GRECO ; Pierluigi BIANCHI ; Giuseppe D’ORIANO ; Alessandro STAZI ; Nicola ANTONACCI ; Raffaella Marina Di RENZO ; Gianmario Edoardo POTO ; Giuseppe Paolo FERULANO ; Antonio LONGO ; Ludovico DOCIMO
Annals of Coloproctology 2024;40(4):287-320
The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia, SIUCP) on the diagnosis and management of hemorrhoidal disease, with the goal of guiding physicians in the choice of the best treatment option. A panel of experts was charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key questions on the main topics related to the management of hemorrhoidal disease and to perform an accurate and comprehensive literature search on each topic, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in multiple rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to PICO (patients, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) criteria, and the statements were developed adopting the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) methodology. In cases of grade 1 hemorrhoidal prolapse, outpatient procedures including hemorrhoidal laser procedure and sclerotherapy may be considered the preferred surgical options. For grade 2 prolapse, nonexcisional procedures including outpatient treatments, hemorrhoidal artery ligation and mucopexy, laser hemorrhoidoplasty, the Rafaelo procedure, and stapled hemorrhoidopexy may represent the first-line treatment options, whereas excisional surgery may be considered in selected cases. In cases of grades 3 and 4, stapled hemorrhoidopexy and hemorrhoidectomy may represent the most effective procedures, even if, in the expert panel opinion, stapled hemorrhoidopexy represents the gold-standard treatment for grade 3 hemorrhoidal prolapse.
4.The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of acute and chronic hemorrhoidal disease
Antonio BRILLANTINO ; Adolfo RENZI ; Pasquale TALENTO ; Luigi BRUSCIANO ; Luigi MARANO ; Maurizio GRILLO ; Mauro Natale MAGLIO ; Fabrizio FORONI ; Alessio PALUMBO ; Maria Laura Sandoval SOTELO ; Luciano VICENZO ; Michele LANZA ; Giovanna FREZZA ; Massimo ANTROPOLI ; Claudio GAMBARDELLA ; Luigi MONACO ; Ilaria FERRANTE ; Domenico IZZO ; Alfredo GIORDANO ; Michele PINTO ; Corrado FANTINI ; Marcello GASPARRINI ; Michele Schiano DI VISCONTE ; Francesca MILAZZO ; Giovanni FERRERI ; Andrea BRAINI ; Umberto COCOZZA ; Massimo PEZZATINI ; Valeria GIANFREDA ; Alberto DI LEO ; Vincenzo LANDOLFI ; Umberto FAVETTA ; Sergio AGRADI ; Giovanni MARINO ; Massimiliano VARRIALE ; Massimo MONGARDINI ; Claudio Eduardo Fernando Antonio PAGANO ; Riccardo Brachet CONTUL ; Nando GALLESE ; Giampiero UCCHINO ; Michele D’AMBRA ; Roberto RIZZATO ; Giacomo SARZO ; Bruno MASCI ; Francesca DA POZZO ; Simona ASCANELLI ; Patrizia LIGUORI ; Angela PEZZOLLA ; Francesca IACOBELLIS ; Erika BORIANI ; Eugenio CUDAZZO ; Francesca BABIC ; Carmelo GEREMIA ; Alessandro BUSSOTTI ; Mario CICCONI ; Antonia Di SARNO ; Federico Maria MONGARDINI ; Antonio BRESCIA ; Leonardo LENISA ; Massimiliano MISTRANGELO ; Matteo ZUIN ; Marta MOZZON ; Alessandro Paolo CHIRIATTI ; Vincenzo BOTTINO ; Antonio FERRONETTI ; Corrado RISPOLI ; Ludovico CARBONE ; Giuseppe CALABRÒ ; Antonino TIRRÒ ; Domenico DE VITO ; Giovanna IOIA ; Giovanni Luca LAMANNA ; Lorenzo ASCIORE ; Ettore GRECO ; Pierluigi BIANCHI ; Giuseppe D’ORIANO ; Alessandro STAZI ; Nicola ANTONACCI ; Raffaella Marina Di RENZO ; Gianmario Edoardo POTO ; Giuseppe Paolo FERULANO ; Antonio LONGO ; Ludovico DOCIMO
Annals of Coloproctology 2024;40(4):287-320
The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia, SIUCP) on the diagnosis and management of hemorrhoidal disease, with the goal of guiding physicians in the choice of the best treatment option. A panel of experts was charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key questions on the main topics related to the management of hemorrhoidal disease and to perform an accurate and comprehensive literature search on each topic, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in multiple rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to PICO (patients, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) criteria, and the statements were developed adopting the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) methodology. In cases of grade 1 hemorrhoidal prolapse, outpatient procedures including hemorrhoidal laser procedure and sclerotherapy may be considered the preferred surgical options. For grade 2 prolapse, nonexcisional procedures including outpatient treatments, hemorrhoidal artery ligation and mucopexy, laser hemorrhoidoplasty, the Rafaelo procedure, and stapled hemorrhoidopexy may represent the first-line treatment options, whereas excisional surgery may be considered in selected cases. In cases of grades 3 and 4, stapled hemorrhoidopexy and hemorrhoidectomy may represent the most effective procedures, even if, in the expert panel opinion, stapled hemorrhoidopexy represents the gold-standard treatment for grade 3 hemorrhoidal prolapse.
5.The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of acute and chronic hemorrhoidal disease
Antonio BRILLANTINO ; Adolfo RENZI ; Pasquale TALENTO ; Luigi BRUSCIANO ; Luigi MARANO ; Maurizio GRILLO ; Mauro Natale MAGLIO ; Fabrizio FORONI ; Alessio PALUMBO ; Maria Laura Sandoval SOTELO ; Luciano VICENZO ; Michele LANZA ; Giovanna FREZZA ; Massimo ANTROPOLI ; Claudio GAMBARDELLA ; Luigi MONACO ; Ilaria FERRANTE ; Domenico IZZO ; Alfredo GIORDANO ; Michele PINTO ; Corrado FANTINI ; Marcello GASPARRINI ; Michele Schiano DI VISCONTE ; Francesca MILAZZO ; Giovanni FERRERI ; Andrea BRAINI ; Umberto COCOZZA ; Massimo PEZZATINI ; Valeria GIANFREDA ; Alberto DI LEO ; Vincenzo LANDOLFI ; Umberto FAVETTA ; Sergio AGRADI ; Giovanni MARINO ; Massimiliano VARRIALE ; Massimo MONGARDINI ; Claudio Eduardo Fernando Antonio PAGANO ; Riccardo Brachet CONTUL ; Nando GALLESE ; Giampiero UCCHINO ; Michele D’AMBRA ; Roberto RIZZATO ; Giacomo SARZO ; Bruno MASCI ; Francesca DA POZZO ; Simona ASCANELLI ; Patrizia LIGUORI ; Angela PEZZOLLA ; Francesca IACOBELLIS ; Erika BORIANI ; Eugenio CUDAZZO ; Francesca BABIC ; Carmelo GEREMIA ; Alessandro BUSSOTTI ; Mario CICCONI ; Antonia Di SARNO ; Federico Maria MONGARDINI ; Antonio BRESCIA ; Leonardo LENISA ; Massimiliano MISTRANGELO ; Matteo ZUIN ; Marta MOZZON ; Alessandro Paolo CHIRIATTI ; Vincenzo BOTTINO ; Antonio FERRONETTI ; Corrado RISPOLI ; Ludovico CARBONE ; Giuseppe CALABRÒ ; Antonino TIRRÒ ; Domenico DE VITO ; Giovanna IOIA ; Giovanni Luca LAMANNA ; Lorenzo ASCIORE ; Ettore GRECO ; Pierluigi BIANCHI ; Giuseppe D’ORIANO ; Alessandro STAZI ; Nicola ANTONACCI ; Raffaella Marina Di RENZO ; Gianmario Edoardo POTO ; Giuseppe Paolo FERULANO ; Antonio LONGO ; Ludovico DOCIMO
Annals of Coloproctology 2024;40(4):287-320
The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia, SIUCP) on the diagnosis and management of hemorrhoidal disease, with the goal of guiding physicians in the choice of the best treatment option. A panel of experts was charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key questions on the main topics related to the management of hemorrhoidal disease and to perform an accurate and comprehensive literature search on each topic, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in multiple rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to PICO (patients, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) criteria, and the statements were developed adopting the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) methodology. In cases of grade 1 hemorrhoidal prolapse, outpatient procedures including hemorrhoidal laser procedure and sclerotherapy may be considered the preferred surgical options. For grade 2 prolapse, nonexcisional procedures including outpatient treatments, hemorrhoidal artery ligation and mucopexy, laser hemorrhoidoplasty, the Rafaelo procedure, and stapled hemorrhoidopexy may represent the first-line treatment options, whereas excisional surgery may be considered in selected cases. In cases of grades 3 and 4, stapled hemorrhoidopexy and hemorrhoidectomy may represent the most effective procedures, even if, in the expert panel opinion, stapled hemorrhoidopexy represents the gold-standard treatment for grade 3 hemorrhoidal prolapse.
6.The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of acute and chronic hemorrhoidal disease
Antonio BRILLANTINO ; Adolfo RENZI ; Pasquale TALENTO ; Luigi BRUSCIANO ; Luigi MARANO ; Maurizio GRILLO ; Mauro Natale MAGLIO ; Fabrizio FORONI ; Alessio PALUMBO ; Maria Laura Sandoval SOTELO ; Luciano VICENZO ; Michele LANZA ; Giovanna FREZZA ; Massimo ANTROPOLI ; Claudio GAMBARDELLA ; Luigi MONACO ; Ilaria FERRANTE ; Domenico IZZO ; Alfredo GIORDANO ; Michele PINTO ; Corrado FANTINI ; Marcello GASPARRINI ; Michele Schiano DI VISCONTE ; Francesca MILAZZO ; Giovanni FERRERI ; Andrea BRAINI ; Umberto COCOZZA ; Massimo PEZZATINI ; Valeria GIANFREDA ; Alberto DI LEO ; Vincenzo LANDOLFI ; Umberto FAVETTA ; Sergio AGRADI ; Giovanni MARINO ; Massimiliano VARRIALE ; Massimo MONGARDINI ; Claudio Eduardo Fernando Antonio PAGANO ; Riccardo Brachet CONTUL ; Nando GALLESE ; Giampiero UCCHINO ; Michele D’AMBRA ; Roberto RIZZATO ; Giacomo SARZO ; Bruno MASCI ; Francesca DA POZZO ; Simona ASCANELLI ; Patrizia LIGUORI ; Angela PEZZOLLA ; Francesca IACOBELLIS ; Erika BORIANI ; Eugenio CUDAZZO ; Francesca BABIC ; Carmelo GEREMIA ; Alessandro BUSSOTTI ; Mario CICCONI ; Antonia Di SARNO ; Federico Maria MONGARDINI ; Antonio BRESCIA ; Leonardo LENISA ; Massimiliano MISTRANGELO ; Matteo ZUIN ; Marta MOZZON ; Alessandro Paolo CHIRIATTI ; Vincenzo BOTTINO ; Antonio FERRONETTI ; Corrado RISPOLI ; Ludovico CARBONE ; Giuseppe CALABRÒ ; Antonino TIRRÒ ; Domenico DE VITO ; Giovanna IOIA ; Giovanni Luca LAMANNA ; Lorenzo ASCIORE ; Ettore GRECO ; Pierluigi BIANCHI ; Giuseppe D’ORIANO ; Alessandro STAZI ; Nicola ANTONACCI ; Raffaella Marina Di RENZO ; Gianmario Edoardo POTO ; Giuseppe Paolo FERULANO ; Antonio LONGO ; Ludovico DOCIMO
Annals of Coloproctology 2024;40(4):287-320
The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia, SIUCP) on the diagnosis and management of hemorrhoidal disease, with the goal of guiding physicians in the choice of the best treatment option. A panel of experts was charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key questions on the main topics related to the management of hemorrhoidal disease and to perform an accurate and comprehensive literature search on each topic, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in multiple rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to PICO (patients, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) criteria, and the statements were developed adopting the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) methodology. In cases of grade 1 hemorrhoidal prolapse, outpatient procedures including hemorrhoidal laser procedure and sclerotherapy may be considered the preferred surgical options. For grade 2 prolapse, nonexcisional procedures including outpatient treatments, hemorrhoidal artery ligation and mucopexy, laser hemorrhoidoplasty, the Rafaelo procedure, and stapled hemorrhoidopexy may represent the first-line treatment options, whereas excisional surgery may be considered in selected cases. In cases of grades 3 and 4, stapled hemorrhoidopexy and hemorrhoidectomy may represent the most effective procedures, even if, in the expert panel opinion, stapled hemorrhoidopexy represents the gold-standard treatment for grade 3 hemorrhoidal prolapse.