1.Comparison of Anogenital Distance and Correlation with Vulvo-vaginal Atrophy: A Pilot Study on Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women
Lavinia DOMENICI ; Angela MUSELLA ; Carlotta BRACCHI ; Francesca LECCE ; Michele Carlo SCHIAVI ; Vanessa COLAGIOVANNI ; Violante DI DONATO ; Claudia MARCHETTI ; Federica TOMAO ; Innocenza PALAIA ; Ludovico MUZII ; Pierluigi BENEDETTI PANICI
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2018;24(2):108-112
OBJECTIVES: Anogenital distance (AGD) represents the space between labia posterior commissure and anus. This was pilot study to investigate how menopause and so lack of oestrogens affects AGD. METHODS: A total of 109 patients were enrolled. AGD was measured in lithotomy position using sterile paper ruler. Anogenital index (AGI) was used to control 2 variables of height and weight (body mass index, kg/m2). Vaginal health index (VHI) was used to evaluate vaginal wellness. Female sexual function index (FSFI) questionnaire was administered to all women to evaluate the impact of menopause on their sexual function. RESULTS: AGD (30.87 ± 2.98 vs. 17.57 ± 2.18; P = 0.0001) and AGI (1.40 ± 0.21 vs. 0.70 ± 0.15; P = 0.0001) were both significantly lower in the postmenopausal group. Postmenopausal women were affected by vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) significantly. Thus, VHI scores were dramatically worse in postmenopausal group (23.95 ± 1.28 vs. 10.75 ± 3.41; P = 0.0001) as well as FSFI results (32.68 ± 2.25 vs. 19.78 ± 5.46; P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that AGD in post-menopausal women was significantly shorter than AGD in premenopausal women, correlating with an increase of VVA and sexual impairment. Changes of AGD and AGI demonstrated to predict hormonal changes that may occur after menopause.
Anal Canal
;
Atrophy
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Menopause
;
Pilot Projects
;
Sexuality
2.Treatment of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause in Breast Cancer and Gynecologic Cancer Survivors:Retrospective Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Vaginal Estriol, Vaginal Dehydroepiandrosterone and Ospemifene
Ermelinda PENNACCHINI ; Roberta DALL’ALBA ; Silvia IAPAOLO ; Matilde MARINELLI ; Pier Luigi PALAZZETTI ; Marzio Angelo ZULLO ; Mauro CERVIGNI ; Andrea MORCIANO ; Lorenzo CAMPANELLA ; Benedetto FERRARESI ; Michele Carlo SCHIAVI
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(3):170-178
Objectives:
To compare the efficacy and safety of three different treatment options (vaginal estriol, vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and ospemifene) for treating genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) in breast cancer and gynecologic cancer survivors.
Methods:
A retrospective comparative analysis was performed among 185 cancer survivors (including breast, endometrial, ovarian, cervical, and vulvar cancer) affected by GSM. Women were divided into three groups according to the prescribed therapy (vaginal estriol, vaginal DHEA, and ospemifene). Safety and efficacy of therapies were assessed over a 6-month follow-up. Improvement in symptoms was compared using the following questionnaires: Female Sexual Function Index, Female Sexual Distress Scale, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-dyspareunia, VAS-vulvar pain, Short Form (36) Health Survey, and Patients’ Impression of Global Improvement. Cancer recurrence was evaluated according to oncological protocol.
Results:
After the 6-month follow-up, no significant endometrial thickening or cancer recurrence was observed in any group. The rate of sexually active women significantly increased in all groups, as well as the frequency of sexual intercourse. Scores on questionnaires assessing women’s sexual function significantly improved in all patients. Women also complained of less vulvar pain and dyspareunia.Safety and efficacy of treatment were comparable between the three groups for all items except for dyspareunia. Patients taking ospemifene complained of less dyspareunia than those receiving local hormone treatment.
Conclusions
Vaginal estriol, vaginal DHEA, and ospemifene were effective in improving symptoms of GSM in cancer survivors and were not associated with cancer recurrence over the 6-month follow-up. Ospemifene was more effective than local hormones in treating dyspareunia.
3.Treatment of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause in Breast Cancer and Gynecologic Cancer Survivors:Retrospective Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Vaginal Estriol, Vaginal Dehydroepiandrosterone and Ospemifene
Ermelinda PENNACCHINI ; Roberta DALL’ALBA ; Silvia IAPAOLO ; Matilde MARINELLI ; Pier Luigi PALAZZETTI ; Marzio Angelo ZULLO ; Mauro CERVIGNI ; Andrea MORCIANO ; Lorenzo CAMPANELLA ; Benedetto FERRARESI ; Michele Carlo SCHIAVI
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(3):170-178
Objectives:
To compare the efficacy and safety of three different treatment options (vaginal estriol, vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and ospemifene) for treating genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) in breast cancer and gynecologic cancer survivors.
Methods:
A retrospective comparative analysis was performed among 185 cancer survivors (including breast, endometrial, ovarian, cervical, and vulvar cancer) affected by GSM. Women were divided into three groups according to the prescribed therapy (vaginal estriol, vaginal DHEA, and ospemifene). Safety and efficacy of therapies were assessed over a 6-month follow-up. Improvement in symptoms was compared using the following questionnaires: Female Sexual Function Index, Female Sexual Distress Scale, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-dyspareunia, VAS-vulvar pain, Short Form (36) Health Survey, and Patients’ Impression of Global Improvement. Cancer recurrence was evaluated according to oncological protocol.
Results:
After the 6-month follow-up, no significant endometrial thickening or cancer recurrence was observed in any group. The rate of sexually active women significantly increased in all groups, as well as the frequency of sexual intercourse. Scores on questionnaires assessing women’s sexual function significantly improved in all patients. Women also complained of less vulvar pain and dyspareunia.Safety and efficacy of treatment were comparable between the three groups for all items except for dyspareunia. Patients taking ospemifene complained of less dyspareunia than those receiving local hormone treatment.
Conclusions
Vaginal estriol, vaginal DHEA, and ospemifene were effective in improving symptoms of GSM in cancer survivors and were not associated with cancer recurrence over the 6-month follow-up. Ospemifene was more effective than local hormones in treating dyspareunia.
4.Treatment of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause in Breast Cancer and Gynecologic Cancer Survivors:Retrospective Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Vaginal Estriol, Vaginal Dehydroepiandrosterone and Ospemifene
Ermelinda PENNACCHINI ; Roberta DALL’ALBA ; Silvia IAPAOLO ; Matilde MARINELLI ; Pier Luigi PALAZZETTI ; Marzio Angelo ZULLO ; Mauro CERVIGNI ; Andrea MORCIANO ; Lorenzo CAMPANELLA ; Benedetto FERRARESI ; Michele Carlo SCHIAVI
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(3):170-178
Objectives:
To compare the efficacy and safety of three different treatment options (vaginal estriol, vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and ospemifene) for treating genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) in breast cancer and gynecologic cancer survivors.
Methods:
A retrospective comparative analysis was performed among 185 cancer survivors (including breast, endometrial, ovarian, cervical, and vulvar cancer) affected by GSM. Women were divided into three groups according to the prescribed therapy (vaginal estriol, vaginal DHEA, and ospemifene). Safety and efficacy of therapies were assessed over a 6-month follow-up. Improvement in symptoms was compared using the following questionnaires: Female Sexual Function Index, Female Sexual Distress Scale, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-dyspareunia, VAS-vulvar pain, Short Form (36) Health Survey, and Patients’ Impression of Global Improvement. Cancer recurrence was evaluated according to oncological protocol.
Results:
After the 6-month follow-up, no significant endometrial thickening or cancer recurrence was observed in any group. The rate of sexually active women significantly increased in all groups, as well as the frequency of sexual intercourse. Scores on questionnaires assessing women’s sexual function significantly improved in all patients. Women also complained of less vulvar pain and dyspareunia.Safety and efficacy of treatment were comparable between the three groups for all items except for dyspareunia. Patients taking ospemifene complained of less dyspareunia than those receiving local hormone treatment.
Conclusions
Vaginal estriol, vaginal DHEA, and ospemifene were effective in improving symptoms of GSM in cancer survivors and were not associated with cancer recurrence over the 6-month follow-up. Ospemifene was more effective than local hormones in treating dyspareunia.