1.Psychological profiles of irritable bowel syndrome patients with different phenotypes
Michel BOUCHOUCHA ; Ghislain DEVROEDE ; Noëlle GIRAULT-LIDVAN ; Maria HEJNAR ; Florence MARY ; Robert BENAMOUZIG
Intestinal Research 2020;18(4):459-468
Background/Aims:
Abnormal psychological profiles are frequently found in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). The present study aimed to evaluate the psychological profiles of FGID patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and IBS phenotypes.
Methods:
In 608 FGID patients, including 235 with IBS, have filled a Rome III questionnaire and the French version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2. Data analysis was performed using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression.
Results:
This study shows that IBS patients have abnormal psychological profiles with more significant symptom exaggeration and decreased test defensiveness than non-IBS patients. They have a significantly higher score for all clinical scales. Logistic regression analysis showed in IBS patients a decrease of body mass index (P= 0.002), and test defensiveness score K (P= 0.001) and an increase of Hypochondriasis (P< 0.001) and Masculinity-Femininity scale (P= 0.018). By comparison with non-IBS patients, IBS-constipation, IBS-diarrhea, and mixed IBS patients have increased Hypochondriasis value and Depression score, mixed IBS patients have higher Psychasthenia score and higher Hypomania score. No item was significantly different in the IBS-unspecified group.
Conclusions
This study shows that IBS patients have different psychological profiles than other FGID patients and that psychological characteristics are associated with IBS phenotypes except for patients with unsubtyped IBS.
2.Relationship Between Colonic Transit Response to Eating With Self-reported Constipation Severity in Constipated Patients According to the Phenotype
David DEUTSCH ; Michel BOUCHOUCHA ; Julien UZAN ; Gheorghe AIRINEI ; Jean-Marc SABATE ; Robert BENAMOUZIG
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2024;30(1):97-105
Background/Aims:
Eating is the major synchronizer of gastrointestinal motility and secretions. The present study aims to evaluate the interplay between self-perceived constipation severity (CS) and colonic response to eating in constipated patients according to the phenotype.
Methods:
We included 387 consecutive outpatients complaining of Rome IV chronic idiopathic constipation. Likert scales for CS, abdominal pain severity, bloating severity, depression and anxiety assessment, total and segmental colonic transit time (CTT), and colonic transit response to eating (CTRE) were performed in all patients.
Results:
Of the 387 patients included (49.7 ± 16.4 years), 320 (83%) were female, 203 had irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C), 184 as functional constipation (FC), and 283 had defecation disorders (DD). The female gender was characterized by increased bloating severity (P = 0.011) and decreased Bristol stool form (P = 0.002). In IBS-C and FC patients, CS was related with bloating severity (P < 0.001 in both groups) and total CTT (P = 0.007 in IBS-constipation, P = 0.040 in FC). In IBS-C patients, CS was also associated with abdominal pain severity (P = 0.003) and Bristol stool form (P = 0.004). In contrast, in FC, CS was only related to left CTRE (P = 0.006), and in patients with DD, CS was associated with total CTT (P < 0.001) and left CTRE (P = 0.002).
Conclusion
Colonic transit response to eating was not associated to CS in IBS-C patients, but left CTRE was associated with constipation severity in FC and DD patients.
3.Influence of Age and Body Mass Index on Total and Segmental Colonic Transit Times in Constipated Subjects
Michel BOUCHOUCHA ; Marinos FYSEKIDIS ; Pierre ROMPTEAUX ; Gheorge AIRINEI ; Jean Marc SABATE ; Robert BENAMOUZIG
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2019;25(2):258-266
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Discordant data are found in the literature for the relationships between total and segmental colonic transit time (CTT) and demographic parameters. The aim of this study is to examine the influence of age, and body mass index (BMI) on total and segmental CTT in constipated subjects. METHODS: We included 354 constipated patients on this cross-sectional study. According to the Rome III criteria, patients were classified as having irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, or functional constipation. All patients filled the Bristol stool form, and reported the severity of constipation, bloating, and abdominal pain on a 10-point Likert scale. Total and segmental CTT were measured using radiopaque markers. RESULTS: Females were 84% of patients, with a mean age of 46.0 ± 15.9 years. The association between total and segmental CTT with age and BMI was significant after adjustment for gender, clinical phenotype, the presence of defecation disorders, and abdominal pain or bloating intensity despite the severity of symptoms, and the frequency of defecation disorders were higher in irritable bowel syndrome with constipation than in functional constipation patients. By comparison with subjects less than 30 years, rectosigmoid transit time (RSTT) was lower in patients between 30 and 60 years. Age was negatively associated with RSTT (P = 0.004). By comparison with patients with normal BMI, RSTT and total CTT were lower in patients of the overweight group. BMI was negatively associated with RSTT (P < 0.001). The severity of constipation was correlated with total (P < 0.001), right (P = 0.002), and left CTT (P = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Age and BMI are both associated with RSTT in constipated patients.
Abdominal Pain
;
Body Mass Index
;
Colon
;
Constipation
;
Cross-Sectional Studies
;
Defecation
;
Female
;
Gastrointestinal Diseases
;
Humans
;
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
;
Overweight
;
Phenotype
4.Lactose Sensitivity and Lactose Malabsorption:The 2 Faces of Lactose Intolerance
Michel BOUCHOUCHA ; Marinos FYSEKIDIS ; Pierre ROMPTEAUX ; Jean-Jacques RAYNAUD ; Jean-Marc SABATE ; Robert BENAMOUZIG
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2021;27(2):257-264
Background/Aims:
Self-reported lactose intolerance (LI) is frequent in patients with functional bowel disorders (FBD) that could be interpreted as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The present study aims to characterize the responses of patients with FBD, without small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), and LI, in terms of lactose malabsorption (LM) and lactose sensitivity (LS) according to psychological and clinical features.
Methods:
One hundred and fifty-eight consecutive FBD outpatients with LI, and no SIBO, were classified according to the Rome III questionnaire and filled Beck Depression Inventory, and State and Trait Anxiety questionnaires. They underwent a lactose tolerance test in which glycemia during 60 minutes and digestive symptoms for 3 hours were recorded.
Results:
Abnormal lactose tolerance tests were found in 110 patients (70%), 44 (28%) with LM, 96 (61%) with LS, and 30 (19%) having both LM and LS. LM patients had a higher frequency of functional diarrhea (P = 0.040) and a lower frequency of dysphagia (P = 0.031).LS patients had a higher depression score (P = 0.007), higher frequency of globus (P = 0.042), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (P = 0.027) and mixed IBS (P = 0.049), and lower frequency of abdominal pain (P = 0.040). LS was significantly associated with a higher depression score (P = 0.002), and a higher frequency of globus (P = 0.046).
Conclusions
Thirty percent of LI patients have normal lactose absorption and normal LS. In the other 70% of patients, LI could be associated with LM and/or LS.
5.Lactose Sensitivity and Lactose Malabsorption:The 2 Faces of Lactose Intolerance
Michel BOUCHOUCHA ; Marinos FYSEKIDIS ; Pierre ROMPTEAUX ; Jean-Jacques RAYNAUD ; Jean-Marc SABATE ; Robert BENAMOUZIG
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2021;27(2):257-264
Background/Aims:
Self-reported lactose intolerance (LI) is frequent in patients with functional bowel disorders (FBD) that could be interpreted as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The present study aims to characterize the responses of patients with FBD, without small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), and LI, in terms of lactose malabsorption (LM) and lactose sensitivity (LS) according to psychological and clinical features.
Methods:
One hundred and fifty-eight consecutive FBD outpatients with LI, and no SIBO, were classified according to the Rome III questionnaire and filled Beck Depression Inventory, and State and Trait Anxiety questionnaires. They underwent a lactose tolerance test in which glycemia during 60 minutes and digestive symptoms for 3 hours were recorded.
Results:
Abnormal lactose tolerance tests were found in 110 patients (70%), 44 (28%) with LM, 96 (61%) with LS, and 30 (19%) having both LM and LS. LM patients had a higher frequency of functional diarrhea (P = 0.040) and a lower frequency of dysphagia (P = 0.031).LS patients had a higher depression score (P = 0.007), higher frequency of globus (P = 0.042), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (P = 0.027) and mixed IBS (P = 0.049), and lower frequency of abdominal pain (P = 0.040). LS was significantly associated with a higher depression score (P = 0.002), and a higher frequency of globus (P = 0.046).
Conclusions
Thirty percent of LI patients have normal lactose absorption and normal LS. In the other 70% of patients, LI could be associated with LM and/or LS.