1.Radiofrequency Bio-Effects Research in the Pan-Pacific Area: Current AFRL/HEDR and AOARD Efforts.
Michael MURPHY ; Terence LYONS
Korean Journal of Aerospace and Environmental Medicine 2000;10(2):148-153
No abstract available.
2.Molecular diagnostic testing in dermatology and dermatopathology.
Elaba Zendee P. ; Murphy Michael J.
Journal of the Philippine Dermatological Society 2011;20(2):16-24
Molecular techniques are increasingly being employed in the field of dermatology, helping to facilitate the diagnosis and prognostication of a variety of skin diseases, in addition to guiding the selection of appropriate treatment, monitoring of therapy and identification of novel therapeutic targets. A basic knowledge of the principles of molecular diagnostics is now essential for physicians involved in the diagnosis and/or treatment of skin diseases, primarily dermatopathologists and dermatologists. Essentially, molecular diagnostic testing involves the analysis of nucleic acids (DNA and/or RNA) with a wide variety of laboratory methods. Nucleic acid amplification methods have traditionally dominated this field, with the most readily recognizable of these being polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Newer technologies are now being incorporated and can facilitate parallel gene analyses (i.e.,cDNA/oligonucleotide microarrays) and/or correlation of genomic changes with morphological features of disease [i.e., fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)]. This discussion provides an overview of the principles of molecular technologies most frequently used in dermatology and highlights their applications in particular disease categories.
Dermatology ; Genomics ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Molecular Diagnostic Techniques ; Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques ; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Skin Diseases
3.The Impact of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on Antibiotic Resistance in Periprosthetic Knee Infections
Daniel R. SCHMITT ; Cameron KILLEN ; Michael MURPHY ; Michael PERRY ; Joseph ROMANO ; Nicholas BROWN
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2020;12(3):318-323
Background:
Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is commonly used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially among high-risk patients. While previous studies have reported on the efficacy of ALBC in reducing the rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), its impact on antibiotic resistance has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to investigate antibiotic resistance among organisms causing PJIs after TKA in which ALBC was utilized.
Methods:
A retrospective review from December 1998 through December 2017 identified 36 PJIs that met inclusion criteria. Patients with culture-negative infection and unknown cement type were excluded. Patient characteristics, infecting organism, and antibiotic susceptibilities were recorded. ABLC included an aminoglycoside in all cases.
Results:
There was no difference in the type of PJI between the 2 groups. Staphylococcus species was the most commonly isolated, with 9 of 16 cases (56.3%) using non-ALBC and 14 of 20 (65.0%) cases using ALBC. Of those infected with Staphylococcus, there was no significant difference in antibiotic susceptibilities between groups. Overall, there were only 3 cases where the infecting organism was aminoglycoside resistant (standard cement, 1; ALBC, 2).
Conclusions
These results suggest that the use of ALBC does not increase the risk of antibiotic resistance or affect the pattern of infection, even as the use of ALBC continues to increase, particularly among high-risk patients.
4.Complete Radiological Findings in Gallstone Ileus.
Kevin P MURPHY ; David E KEARNEY ; Patrick D MC LAUGHLIN ; Michael M MAHER
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2012;18(4):448-449
No abstract available.
Gallstones
;
Ileus
5.Demographic data is more predictive of component size than digital radiographic templating in total knee arthroplasty
Stephen J. WALLACE ; Michael P. MURPHY ; Corey J. SCHIFFMAN ; William J. HOPKINSON ; Nicholas M. BROWN
The Journal of Korean Knee Society 2020;32(4):e63-
Background:
Preoperative radiographic templating for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to be inaccurate. Patient demographic data, such as gender, height, weight, age, and race, may be more predictive of implanted component size in TKA.
Materials and methods:
A multivariate linear regression model was designed to predict implanted femoral and tibial component size using demographic data along a consecutive series of 201 patients undergoing index TKA.Traditional, two-dimensional, radiographic templating was compared to demographic-based regression predictions on a prospective 181 consecutive patients undergoing index TKA in their ability to accurately predict intraoperative implanted sizes. Surgeons were blinded of any predictions.
Results:
Patient gender, height, weight, age, and ethnicity/race were predictive of implanted TKA component size.The regression model more accurately predicted implanted component size compared to radiographically templated sizes for both the femoral (P = 0.04) and tibial (P < 0.01) components. The regression model exactly predicted femoral and tibial component sizes in 43.7 and 43.7% of cases, was within one size 90.1 and 95.6% of the time, and was within two sizes in every case. Radiographic templating exactly predicted 35.4 and 36.5% of cases, was within one size 86.2 and 85.1% of the time, and varied up to four sizes for both the femoral and tibial components. The regression model averaged within 0.66 and 0.61 sizes, versus 0.81 and 0.81 sizes for radiographic templating for femoral and tibial components.
Conclusions
A demographic-based regression model was created based on patient-specific demographic data to predict femoral and tibial TKA component sizes. In a prospective patient series, the regression model more accurately and precisely predicted implanted component sizes compared to radiographic templating.Level of evidence: Prospective cohort, level II.
6.Surgical revascularization for Moyamoya disease in the United States: A cost-effectiveness analysis
Arvin R. WALI ; David. R. SANTIAGO-DIEPPA ; Shanmukha SRINIVAS ; Michael G. BRANDEL ; Jeffrey A. STEINBERG ; Robert C RENNERT ; Ross MANDEVILLE ; James D. MURPHY ; Scott OLSON ; J. Scott PANNELL ; Alexander A. KHALESSI
Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery 2021;23(1):6-15
Objective:
Moyamoya disease (MMD) is a vasculopathy of the internal carotid arteries with ischemic and hemorrhagic sequelae. Surgical revascularization confers upfront peri-procedural risk and costs in exchange for long-term protective benefit against hemorrhagic disease. The authors present a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of surgical versus non-surgical management of MMD.
Methods:
A Markov Model was used to simulate a 41-year-old suffering a transient ischemic attack (TIA) secondary to MMD and now faced with operative versus nonoperative treatment options. Health utilities, costs, and outcome probabilities were obtained from the CEA registry and the published literature. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio which compared the quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs of surgical and nonsurgical treatments. Base-case, one-way sensitivity, two-way sensitivity, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed with a willingness to pay threshold of $50,000.
Results:
The base case model yielded 3.81 QALYs with a cost of $99,500 for surgery, and 3.76 QALYs with a cost of $106,500 for nonsurgical management. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated the greatest sensitivity in assumptions to cost of surgery and cost of admission for hemorrhagic stroke, and probabilities of stroke with no surgery, stroke after surgery, poor surgical outcome, and death after surgery. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that surgical revascularization was the cost-effective strategy in over 87.4% of simulations.
Conclusions
Considering both direct and indirect costs and the postoperative QALY, surgery is considerably more cost-effective than non-surgical management for adults with MMD.
7.Surgical revascularization for Moyamoya disease in the United States: A cost-effectiveness analysis
Arvin R. WALI ; David. R. SANTIAGO-DIEPPA ; Shanmukha SRINIVAS ; Michael G. BRANDEL ; Jeffrey A. STEINBERG ; Robert C RENNERT ; Ross MANDEVILLE ; James D. MURPHY ; Scott OLSON ; J. Scott PANNELL ; Alexander A. KHALESSI
Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery 2021;23(1):6-15
Objective:
Moyamoya disease (MMD) is a vasculopathy of the internal carotid arteries with ischemic and hemorrhagic sequelae. Surgical revascularization confers upfront peri-procedural risk and costs in exchange for long-term protective benefit against hemorrhagic disease. The authors present a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of surgical versus non-surgical management of MMD.
Methods:
A Markov Model was used to simulate a 41-year-old suffering a transient ischemic attack (TIA) secondary to MMD and now faced with operative versus nonoperative treatment options. Health utilities, costs, and outcome probabilities were obtained from the CEA registry and the published literature. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio which compared the quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs of surgical and nonsurgical treatments. Base-case, one-way sensitivity, two-way sensitivity, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed with a willingness to pay threshold of $50,000.
Results:
The base case model yielded 3.81 QALYs with a cost of $99,500 for surgery, and 3.76 QALYs with a cost of $106,500 for nonsurgical management. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated the greatest sensitivity in assumptions to cost of surgery and cost of admission for hemorrhagic stroke, and probabilities of stroke with no surgery, stroke after surgery, poor surgical outcome, and death after surgery. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that surgical revascularization was the cost-effective strategy in over 87.4% of simulations.
Conclusions
Considering both direct and indirect costs and the postoperative QALY, surgery is considerably more cost-effective than non-surgical management for adults with MMD.
8.Demographic data is more predictive of component size than digital radiographic templating in total knee arthroplasty
Stephen J. WALLACE ; Michael P. MURPHY ; Corey J. SCHIFFMAN ; William J. HOPKINSON ; Nicholas M. BROWN
The Journal of Korean Knee Society 2020;32(4):e63-
Background:
Preoperative radiographic templating for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to be inaccurate. Patient demographic data, such as gender, height, weight, age, and race, may be more predictive of implanted component size in TKA.
Materials and methods:
A multivariate linear regression model was designed to predict implanted femoral and tibial component size using demographic data along a consecutive series of 201 patients undergoing index TKA.Traditional, two-dimensional, radiographic templating was compared to demographic-based regression predictions on a prospective 181 consecutive patients undergoing index TKA in their ability to accurately predict intraoperative implanted sizes. Surgeons were blinded of any predictions.
Results:
Patient gender, height, weight, age, and ethnicity/race were predictive of implanted TKA component size.The regression model more accurately predicted implanted component size compared to radiographically templated sizes for both the femoral (P = 0.04) and tibial (P < 0.01) components. The regression model exactly predicted femoral and tibial component sizes in 43.7 and 43.7% of cases, was within one size 90.1 and 95.6% of the time, and was within two sizes in every case. Radiographic templating exactly predicted 35.4 and 36.5% of cases, was within one size 86.2 and 85.1% of the time, and varied up to four sizes for both the femoral and tibial components. The regression model averaged within 0.66 and 0.61 sizes, versus 0.81 and 0.81 sizes for radiographic templating for femoral and tibial components.
Conclusions
A demographic-based regression model was created based on patient-specific demographic data to predict femoral and tibial TKA component sizes. In a prospective patient series, the regression model more accurately and precisely predicted implanted component sizes compared to radiographic templating.Level of evidence: Prospective cohort, level II.