OBJECTIVETo investigate the importance of expression of the NUT gene and its rearrangement in diagnosing NUT midline carcinoma (NMC) of the upper respiratory tract; and to evaluate the prevalence, histological features and differential diagnosis of NMC of the upper respiratory tract.

METHODSOne-hundred and sixty-three small cell malignant tumors of the upper respiratory tract were reviewed at the Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University over a 20-year period. These cases included poorly-differentiated squamous cell carcinomas (n = 31), undifferentiated carcinoma (n = 1), non-keratizing undifferentiated nasopharyneal carcinomas (n = 60), small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (n = 6) and non-epithelial small round cell malignant tumors (n = 65). The clinical and pathologic features were investigated. All cases were subjected to Epstein-Barr virus encoded RNA (EBER) in situ hybridization and NUT monoclonal antibody immunohistochemical staining. Cases positive for NUT immunohistochemistry and negative for EBER in situ hybridization were submitted for fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for rearrangements in both BRD4 and NUT genes, and immunohistochemical staining for a set of cytokeratins (AE1/AE3, CK7, CK8), p63,and neuroendocrine markers (NSE, Syn, CgA, S-100 protein, CD56).

RESULTSThree cases of poorly-differentiated squamous cell carcinomas and one case of undifferentiated carcinoma showed diffuse nuclear immunohistochemical staining with antibody against NUT. These positive cases approximately accounted for 12.5% (4/32) of this group, 4.1% (4/98) of the malignant epithelial carcinomas and 2.5% (4/163) of all small round cell malignant tumors in the study. The age of these patients were 42 - 59 years. Other groups were all negative for NUT immunohistochemistry. These four cases also stained for antibodies against cytokeratins and p63, but were negative for neuroendocrine markers and not associated with EBV infection. Only two of these four cases showed rearrangements of the NUT and BRD4 genes by FISH. These two patients died within one year. The other two patients that did not demonstrate NUT rearrangement by FISH were alive and did not have an aggressive clinical course, surviving 40 and 12 months respectively.

CONCLUSIONSNMC is a rare small round cell malignant tumor in the upper respiratory tract. Only in the groups of primary poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma and undifferentiated carcinoma were positive for NUT immunohistochemical staining and NUT rearrangement by FISH. NMC typically occurs in midline organs, and affects the sinonasal tract. It is not associated with EBV infection. There is difference in the clinical course and prognosis among NMC patients. NUT immunohistochemical staining and NUT gene rearrangement analysis can differentiate NMC from other small cell tumors in the upper respiratory tract.

Adult ; Antibodies, Monoclonal ; metabolism ; Carcinoma ; genetics ; metabolism ; pathology ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ; genetics ; metabolism ; pathology ; Female ; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic ; Gene Rearrangement ; Humans ; Keratins ; metabolism ; Male ; Maxillary Sinus Neoplasms ; genetics ; metabolism ; pathology ; Membrane Proteins ; metabolism ; Middle Aged ; Nose Neoplasms ; genetics ; metabolism ; pathology ; Nuclear Proteins ; genetics ; metabolism ; Oncogene Proteins ; genetics ; metabolism ; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion ; metabolism ; Transcription Factors ; genetics ; metabolism

We hypothesized that the administration of amantadine would increase awakening of comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. Methods We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot trial, randomizing subjects to amantadine 100 mg twice daily or placebo for up to 7 days. The study drug was administered between 72 and 120 hours after resuscitation and patients with absent N20 cortical responses, early cerebral edema, or ongoing malignant electroencephalography patterns were excluded. Our primary outcome was awakening, defined as following two-step commands, within 28 days of cardiac arrest. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, awakening, time to awakening, and neurologic outcome measured by Cerebral Performance Category at hospital discharge. We compared the proportion of subjects awakening and hospital survival using Fisher exact tests and time to awakening and hospital length of stay using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results After 2 years, we stopped the study due to slow enrollment and lapse of funding. We enrolled 14 subjects (12% of goal enrollment), seven in the amantadine group and seven in the placebo group. The proportion of patients who awakened within 28 days after cardiac arrest did not differ between amantadine (n=2, 28.6%) and placebo groups (n=3, 42.9%; P>0.99). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. Study medication was stopped in three subjects (21.4%). Adverse events included a recurrence of seizures (n=2; 14.3%), both of which occurred in the placebo group. Conclusion We could not determine the effect of amantadine on awakening in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest due to small sample size.

We hypothesized that the administration of amantadine would increase awakening of comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. Methods We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot trial, randomizing subjects to amantadine 100 mg twice daily or placebo for up to 7 days. The study drug was administered between 72 and 120 hours after resuscitation and patients with absent N20 cortical responses, early cerebral edema, or ongoing malignant electroencephalography patterns were excluded. Our primary outcome was awakening, defined as following two-step commands, within 28 days of cardiac arrest. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, awakening, time to awakening, and neurologic outcome measured by Cerebral Performance Category at hospital discharge. We compared the proportion of subjects awakening and hospital survival using Fisher exact tests and time to awakening and hospital length of stay using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results After 2 years, we stopped the study due to slow enrollment and lapse of funding. We enrolled 14 subjects (12% of goal enrollment), seven in the amantadine group and seven in the placebo group. The proportion of patients who awakened within 28 days after cardiac arrest did not differ between amantadine (n=2, 28.6%) and placebo groups (n=3, 42.9%; P>0.99). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. Study medication was stopped in three subjects (21.4%). Adverse events included a recurrence of seizures (n=2; 14.3%), both of which occurred in the placebo group. Conclusion We could not determine the effect of amantadine on awakening in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest due to small sample size.

We hypothesized that the administration of amantadine would increase awakening of comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. Methods We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot trial, randomizing subjects to amantadine 100 mg twice daily or placebo for up to 7 days. The study drug was administered between 72 and 120 hours after resuscitation and patients with absent N20 cortical responses, early cerebral edema, or ongoing malignant electroencephalography patterns were excluded. Our primary outcome was awakening, defined as following two-step commands, within 28 days of cardiac arrest. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, awakening, time to awakening, and neurologic outcome measured by Cerebral Performance Category at hospital discharge. We compared the proportion of subjects awakening and hospital survival using Fisher exact tests and time to awakening and hospital length of stay using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results After 2 years, we stopped the study due to slow enrollment and lapse of funding. We enrolled 14 subjects (12% of goal enrollment), seven in the amantadine group and seven in the placebo group. The proportion of patients who awakened within 28 days after cardiac arrest did not differ between amantadine (n=2, 28.6%) and placebo groups (n=3, 42.9%; P>0.99). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. Study medication was stopped in three subjects (21.4%). Adverse events included a recurrence of seizures (n=2; 14.3%), both of which occurred in the placebo group. Conclusion We could not determine the effect of amantadine on awakening in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest due to small sample size.

We hypothesized that the administration of amantadine would increase awakening of comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. Methods We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot trial, randomizing subjects to amantadine 100 mg twice daily or placebo for up to 7 days. The study drug was administered between 72 and 120 hours after resuscitation and patients with absent N20 cortical responses, early cerebral edema, or ongoing malignant electroencephalography patterns were excluded. Our primary outcome was awakening, defined as following two-step commands, within 28 days of cardiac arrest. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, awakening, time to awakening, and neurologic outcome measured by Cerebral Performance Category at hospital discharge. We compared the proportion of subjects awakening and hospital survival using Fisher exact tests and time to awakening and hospital length of stay using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results After 2 years, we stopped the study due to slow enrollment and lapse of funding. We enrolled 14 subjects (12% of goal enrollment), seven in the amantadine group and seven in the placebo group. The proportion of patients who awakened within 28 days after cardiac arrest did not differ between amantadine (n=2, 28.6%) and placebo groups (n=3, 42.9%; P>0.99). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. Study medication was stopped in three subjects (21.4%). Adverse events included a recurrence of seizures (n=2; 14.3%), both of which occurred in the placebo group. Conclusion We could not determine the effect of amantadine on awakening in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest due to small sample size.