1.Investigation of Pain Mechanisms by Calcium Imaging Approaches.
Michael ANDERSON ; Qin ZHENG ; Xinzhong DONG
Neuroscience Bulletin 2018;34(1):194-199
Due to the complex circuitry and plethora of cell types involved in somatosensation, it is becoming increasingly important to be able to observe cellular activity at the population level. In addition, since cells rely on an intricate variety of extracellular factors, it is important to strive to maintain the physiological environment. Many electrophysiological techniques require the implementation of artificially-produced physiological environments and it can be difficult to assess the activity of many cells simultaneously. Moreover, imaging Ca transients using Ca-sensitive dyes often requires in vitro preparations or in vivo injections, which can lead to variable expression levels. With the development of more sensitive genetically-encoded Ca indicators (GECIs) it is now possible to observe changes in Ca transients in large populations of cells at the same time. Recently, groups have used a GECI called GCaMP to address fundamental questions in somatosensation. Researchers can now induce GCaMP expression in the mouse genome using viral or gene knock-in approaches and observe the activity of populations of cells in the pain pathway such as dorsal root ganglia (DRG), spinal neurons, or glia. This approach can be used in vivo and thus maintains the organism's biological integrity. The implementation of GCaMP imaging has led to many advances in our understanding of somatosensation. Here, we review the current findings in pain research using GCaMP imaging as well as discussing potential methodological considerations.
Afferent Pathways
;
physiology
;
Animals
;
Calcium
;
metabolism
;
Calcium Signaling
;
drug effects
;
genetics
;
Ganglia, Spinal
;
metabolism
;
Humans
;
Pain
;
metabolism
;
pathology
2.Temporal Changes of Clomiphene on Testosterone Levels and Semen Parameters in Subfertile Men
Tommy JIANG ; John T. SIGALOS ; Vadim OSADCHIY ; Alvaro SANTAMARIA ; Michael H. ZHENG ; Neilufar MODIRI ; Keith V. REGETS ; Jesse N. MILLS ; Sriram V. ELESWARAPU
The World Journal of Men's Health 2023;41(1):198-203
Purpose:
Clomiphene citrate (CC) is prescribed off-label in men to improve testosterone and sperm parameters, but the duration of treatment needed to reach maximal benefit remains unclear. Our objective was to examine temporal effects of CC on total testosterone (TT) and semen analysis (SA) using longitudinal follow-up data in treated men. Materials and Methods: We analyzed an IRB-approved database of men treated with CC (25 mg q.d. or 50 mg q.o.d.) from January 2016 through May 2021. We identified patients with 3, 6, 9, and 12 month follow-up data for TT and 3, 6, and 9 month follow-up SA. Mean absolute changes in TT and sperm concentration compared to baseline were calculated, along with 95% confidence intervals. Men with prior genitourinary procedures or hormone therapy were excluded. Paired t-tests were used to compare TT and sperm concentration at each time point to baseline (alpha=0.05).
Results:
One hundered thirty-four men received CC, mean age 37.7 years (SD 6.7, range 24–52). TT at all follow-ups (3, 6, 9, and 12 months) were available for 25 men, and SA at 3, 6, and 9 months for 26 men. Baseline TT was 358±145 ng/dL and sperm concentration was 13±17.2 M/mL. Significant improvement in TT was identified at 3 months (62.7 ng/dL, 95% CI: 0.49–125.0, p=0.048), additional benefit at 6 months (181.8 ng/dL, 95% CI: 114.1–249.5, p<0.01), and plateau at 9 and 12 months. Improvement in sperm concentration was first observed at 9 months (20.7 M/mL, 95% CI: 10.2–31.2, p<0.01). Semen volume and sperm motility did not change.
Conclusions
Duration of treatment with clomiphene may impact testosterone and sperm concentration, and the historical 3 month milestone may be insufficient for clinical and research evaluation. Men taking CC may experience plateau in TT at 6 months and first benefit in sperm concentration at 9 months.
3.Systematic and other reviews: criteria and complexities.
Robert T SATALOFF ; Matthew L BUSH ; Rakesh CHANDRA ; Douglas CHEPEHA ; Brian ROTENBERG ; Edward W FISHER ; David GOLDENBERG ; Ehab Y HANNA ; Joseph E KERSCHNER ; Dennis H KRAUS ; John H KROUSE ; Daqing LI ; Michael LINK ; Lawrence R LUSTIG ; Samuel H SELESNICK ; Raj SINDWANI ; Richard J SMITH ; James R TYSOME ; Peter C WEBER ; D Bradley WELLING ; Xinhao ZHANG ; Zheng LIU
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2021;56(7):687-690