Background/Aims: The management decisions regarding gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may differ according to the presence of erosive esophagitis. On the other hand, the availability of upper endoscopy in Indonesia is relatively limited. This study compared the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) and the GERD questionnaire (GERDQ) performance in predicting the presence of clinically significant erosive esophagitis and determined the validity and reliability of the Indonesian-translated version of RDQ. Methods: Ninety-two adults with GERD suspicion were recruited. All patients completed RDQ and GERDQ. Receiver operating curve analysis was conducted on RDQ and GERDQ to evaluate their performance in discriminating LA GERD B or higher esophagitis from others. The translated RDQ preserved its main structure and was culturally adapted. Results: The patients were 66.3% female and 73.9% Javanese. Only 22 (23.9%) patients presented with LA grade B or higher erosive esophagitis. The RDQ showed a higher AUC than the GERDQ (0.602 vs. 0.589). A cutoff point of 20 was selected for the RDQ with sensitivity and specificity of 73% and 50%, respectively, whereas the optimal cutoff point of GERDQ was 8, with a sensitivity and specificity of 77% and 43%, respectively. The r-value greater than the critical value table (r>0.205, p<0.01) confirmed the construct validity of our translated RDQ. The questionnaire also demonstrated excellent reliability (α=0.900) and moderate similarity with the Indonesian version of GERDQ (κ=0.459, p<0.01). Conclusions The RDQ is slightly superior to GERDQ in predicting the presence of clinically significant erosive esophagitis (LA grade B or higher). The Indonesian-translated RDQ is valid and reliable.

Background/Aims: The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) is a questionnaire that evaluates the severity of extra-esophageal symptoms and is one of the most widely used measures to evaluate LPR. This study assessed the validity and reliability of the RSI questionnaire in Bahasa Indonesia and investigated the association between each extra-esophageal symptom reported in the questionnaire and the severity of erosive esophagitis as determined by endoscopic findings. Methods: 85 adult patients with GERD symptoms had an upper endoscopy examination and were asked to complete the translated RSI. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire were assessed. Results: The construct validity of the RSI translated into Bahasa Indonesia was verified with the r value of each question being higher than the crucial table value (r>0.213, p<0.05). Our questionnaire had a Cronbach alpha value of 0.81, which indicates an acceptable level of internal consistency. At least one extra-esophageal symptom was seen in 91.7% of patients with Los Angeles (LA) grade B or higher-grade esophagitis. In addition, the presence of extra-esophageal symptoms was associated with significant mucosal erosion (p=0.20). The symptoms of cough after eating or lying down and chronic cough were associated with the severity of esophageal mucosal erosion (p<0.05). Conclusions The version of RSI translated into Bahasa Indonesia is a valid and reliable tool for assessing extra-esophageal GERD symptoms. The occurrence of extra-esophageal symptoms in patients with typical GERD symptoms is associated with endoscopic findings of LA grade B or erosive esophagitis of higher severity.