Implant biological complications like peri-mucositis and peri-implantitis are still common in clinical practice. Peri-implantitis is a disease characterized by bleeding during the probe procedure, swelling, redness, or exudate of the gingiva around the implant, and bone loss. It is an irreversible disease, and while various treatments have been tried, the results have not always been positive. The implant can be placed in the alveolar bone on the buccolingual, vertical, or horizontal sides. Several studies have found a link between the position of the implant and peri-implantitis. Although the findings of the preceding studies are convincing in theory, the placement of implants in clinical practice is influenced by various circumstances. To overcome the difficulties that may arise during implant placement, dentists must make various efforts, from diagnosis to surgical procedures.

Implant biological complications like peri-mucositis and peri-implantitis are still common in clinical practice. Peri-implantitis is a disease characterized by bleeding during the probe procedure, swelling, redness, or exudate of the gingiva around the implant, and bone loss. It is an irreversible disease, and while various treatments have been tried, the results have not always been positive. The implant can be placed in the alveolar bone on the buccolingual, vertical, or horizontal sides. Several studies have found a link between the position of the implant and peri-implantitis. Although the findings of the preceding studies are convincing in theory, the placement of implants in clinical practice is influenced by various circumstances. To overcome the difficulties that may arise during implant placement, dentists must make various efforts, from diagnosis to surgical procedures.

Implant biological complications like peri-mucositis and peri-implantitis are still common in clinical practice. Peri-implantitis is a disease characterized by bleeding during the probe procedure, swelling, redness, or exudate of the gingiva around the implant, and bone loss. It is an irreversible disease, and while various treatments have been tried, the results have not always been positive. The implant can be placed in the alveolar bone on the buccolingual, vertical, or horizontal sides. Several studies have found a link between the position of the implant and peri-implantitis. Although the findings of the preceding studies are convincing in theory, the placement of implants in clinical practice is influenced by various circumstances. To overcome the difficulties that may arise during implant placement, dentists must make various efforts, from diagnosis to surgical procedures.

Implant biological complications like peri-mucositis and peri-implantitis are still common in clinical practice. Peri-implantitis is a disease characterized by bleeding during the probe procedure, swelling, redness, or exudate of the gingiva around the implant, and bone loss. It is an irreversible disease, and while various treatments have been tried, the results have not always been positive. The implant can be placed in the alveolar bone on the buccolingual, vertical, or horizontal sides. Several studies have found a link between the position of the implant and peri-implantitis. Although the findings of the preceding studies are convincing in theory, the placement of implants in clinical practice is influenced by various circumstances. To overcome the difficulties that may arise during implant placement, dentists must make various efforts, from diagnosis to surgical procedures.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM) to repair perforated sinus membranes in rabbits. METHODS: Bilateral surgical windows (7.5-mm diameter) were prepared on the nasal bones of 14 rabbits. Standardized circular perforations (5-mm diameter) were made in the sinus membrane by manipulating implant twist drills. The perforated sinus membranes were repaired using dHACM or a resorbable collagen membrane (CM). The negative control (NC) group did not undergo perforated sinus membrane repair, while the positive control (PC) group underwent sinus augmentation without perforations. The same amount of deproteinized porcine bone mineral was grafted in all 4 groups. After 6 weeks, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and histomorphometric evaluations were conducted. RESULTS: The micro-CT analysis revealed that the total augmented volume was not significantly different among the groups. In the dHACM group, newly formed bone filled the augmented area with remaining biomaterials; however, non-ciliated flat epithelium and inflammatory cells were observed on the healed sinus membrane. Histometric analysis showed that the percentage of newly formed bone area in the dHACM group did not differ significantly from that in the CM group. The dHACM group showed a significantly higher percentage of newly formed bone area than the NC group, but there was no significant difference between the dHACM and PC groups. CONCLUSIONS: dHACM could be a feasible solution for repairing sinus membrane perforations that occur during sinus floor augmentation.
Amnion ; Biocompatible Materials ; Chorion ; Collagen ; Epithelium ; Humans ; Membranes ; Miners ; Nasal Bone ; Rabbits ; Sinus Floor Augmentation ; Transplants

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence and risk indicators of peri-implantitis in Korean patients with history of periodontal disease. METHODS: A total of 444 patients with 1,485 implants were selected from patients who had been treated at the Department of Periodontology, Chonbuk National University Dental Hospital between July 2014 and June 2015. A group with a history of peri-implantitis (HP) (370 patients with 1,189 implants) and a group with a current peri-implantitis (CP) (318 patients with 1,004 implants) were created based on the radiographic and clinical assessments of implants. The prevalence of peri-implantitis was calculated at both the patient and implant levels. The influence of risk variables on the occurrence of peri-implantitis was analyzed using generalized estimating equations analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of peri-implantitis in the HP and CP groups ranged from 6.7% to 19.7%. The cumulative peri-implantitis rate in the HP group estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method was higher than that in the CP group over the follow-up period. Among the patient-related risk variables, supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) was the only significant risk indicator for the occurrence of peri-implantitis in both groups. In the analysis of implant-related variables, implants supporting fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) and implants with subjective discomfort were associated with a higher prevalence of peri-implantitis than single implants and implants without subjective discomfort in the HP group. The presence of subjective discomfort was the only significant implant-related variable predictive of peri-implantitis in the CP group. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, the prevalence of peri-implantitis in Korean patients with a history of periodontal disease was similar to that reported in other population samples. Regular SPT was important for preventing peri-implantitis. Single implants were found to be less susceptible to peri-implantitis than those supporting FDP. Patients' subjective discomfort was found to be a strong risk indicator for peri-implantitis.
Cross-Sectional Studies* ; Dental Implants ; Dental Prosthesis ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Jeollabuk-do ; Methods ; Peri-Implantitis* ; Periodontal Diseases* ; Prevalence* ; Risk Factors