1.Re-Visiting Metoclopramide to Optimize Visualization with Gastrointestinal Bleeding – Mobilizing Existing Data
Derek J ESTES ; Shivali BERERA ; Amar R DESHPANDE ; Daniel A SUSSMAN
Clinical Endoscopy 2019;52(5):516-517
No abstract available.
Hemorrhage
;
Metoclopramide
2.Influence of Metoclopramide on the Response of Blood Pressure in Rabbits.
Dong Yoon LIM ; Sang Hyeob LEE ; Cheol Hee CHOI ; Dong Joon CHOI ; Soon Pyo HONG ; Kyung Sig CHANG
Korean Circulation Journal 1989;19(1):77-88
No abstract available.
Blood Pressure*
;
Metoclopramide*
;
Rabbits*
3.A comparison of the acute antiemetic effect of ondansetron with combination of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, lorazepam in patients receiving cisplatin.
Seung Ho BAICK ; Mi Kyung CHA ; Yong Wook CHO ; Do Yeun OH ; Sun Joo KIM
Journal of the Korean Cancer Association 1992;24(5):759-765
No abstract available.
Antiemetics*
;
Cisplatin*
;
Dexamethasone*
;
Humans
;
Lorazepam*
;
Metoclopramide*
;
Ondansetron*
4.Transient Hypersomnolence Provoked by Metoclopramide in a Patient with Degenerative Parkinsonism
Sang Won YOO ; Ko Eun CHOI ; Joong Seok KIM
Journal of Movement Disorders 2019;12(1):60-62
No abstract available.
Disorders of Excessive Somnolence
;
Humans
;
Metoclopramide
;
Parkinsonian Disorders
5.A prospective randomized comparison of ondansetron and metoclopramide in the prophylaxis of emesis induced by cisplatinum based combination chemotherapy.
Tejune CHUNG ; Seung Chul SHIM ; Kyung Won KANG ; Il Young CHOI
Journal of the Korean Cancer Association 1991;23(2):418-423
No abstract available.
Drug Therapy, Combination*
;
Metoclopramide*
;
Ondansetron*
;
Prospective Studies*
;
Vomiting*
6.A comparative study using lidocaine, thiopental and metoclopramide as pre-treatment in reducing propofol pain on injection
Florendo Joanna V. ; Barrios Theresa ; Laborte Nelia ; Reyes Jocelyn
Philippine Journal of Anesthesiology 2008;20(2):25-31
Methods: In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, 144 ASA I-II patients, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups. Group I received 2 ml of plain NSS, group II received lidocaine 40 mg, group III received thiopental 0.5mg/kg and group IV received metoclopramide 10 mg. All pretreatment drugs were made into 2 ml solutions and were given IV with manual venous occlusion of 1 minute. Propofol was administered after release of venous occlusion. pain was then assessed using a four-point scale and face pain scale during propofol injection.
Results: 36 patients (100%) complained of pain in the control group compared with 20 (56%), 22 (61%) and 23 (64%) in the lidocaine, thiopental and metoclopramide groups, respectively (p<0.05). there was no significant difference among the 3 test solution with regards to severity of pain. Nor were there any noted complications 24 hours postoperatively on the injection site.
Conclusion: Thiopental and metoclopramide are equally effective as lidocaine in reducing pain during propofol injection when used with manual venous occlusion.
Human
;
LIDOCAINE
;
THIOPENTAL
;
METOCLOPRAMIDE
;
PROPOFOL
;
PAIN MANAGEMENT
;
ANESTHESIA
7.Extrapyramidal side effects after metoclopramide administration in a post-anesthesia care unit: A case report.
Youn Yi JO ; Yong Beom KIM ; Mi Ran YANG ; Young Jin CHANG
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2012;63(3):274-276
Although the incidence of extrapyramidal reactions associated with metoclopramide has been reported to be approximately 0.2%, such reactions are rare in the anesthetic field. Several anesthetic adjuvants, including ondansetron and pregabalin, have also been associated with extrapyramidal side effect. Here, the authors report the case of a 47-year-old patient, previously administered pregabalin and ondansetron, who developed extrapyramidal side effects after a single injection of metoclopramide (10 mg) in a post-anesthesia care unit.
Adjuvants, Anesthesia
;
gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Metoclopramide
;
Middle Aged
;
Ondansetron
;
Pregabalin
8.Effect of Midazolam upon the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting after Middle Ear Surgery.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2007;52(5):550-555
BACKGROUND: Midazolam has been reported to decrease postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We studied the antiemetic effect of midazolam after middle ear surgery. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 90 healthy patients were scheduled for middle ear surgery (tympanomastoidectomy and tympanoplasty). Patients were randomly divided into two groups; Midazolam 0.075 mg/kg (n = 45) or normal saline (n = 45) was administered after induction of anesthesia. The incidence of PONV, metoclopramide and ketorolac usage, pain, sedation, and other side effects were assessed at 6, 24 h after the operation. RESULTS: The incidences of PONV were 15 (33%) in midazolam group and 27 (60%) in placebo group during 24 h postoperatively. The incidence of PONV in midazolam group was significantly lower than that in placebo group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between groups in adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Midazolam 0.075 mg/kg was effective for preventing PONV after middle ear surgery without significant adverse effects.
Anesthesia
;
Antiemetics
;
Ear, Middle*
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Ketorolac
;
Metoclopramide
;
Midazolam*
;
Nausea*
;
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
;
Prospective Studies
;
Vomiting*
9.A Study on Analgesic Effect of Metoclopramide before an Injection of Propofol.
Su Jin KIM ; Eun Jee PARK ; Seung Weon AHN ; Woong KIM ; Mi Woon KIM ; Hyun Sul LIM
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2002;43(5):558-565
BACKGROUND: Propofol is a good induction agent. but it has a disadvantage of pain on intravenous injection. Pretreatment of metoclopramide or lidocaine have been reported to reduce pain on injection. thus, we have evaluated the quantity and quality of anagesic effect of metoclopramide and lidocaine. We observed differences in quality of pain according to venous cannula sizes and intravenous injection sites as well as nausea and vomiting in the postoperative state. METHODS: Eighty patients scheduled for an elective operation by general anesthesia were chosen according to ASA (I or II) and divided into four groups randomly. Each group was injected through venous cannulas with normal saline (control group), metoclopramide 5 mg (group 1), metoclopramide 10 mg (group 2), or 2% lidocaine 40 mg (group 3) respectively. Then, propofol was injected of a 2 mg/kg dose with 0.5 ml/sec to all groups and we asked questions about injection pain after 10 seconds. RESULTS: Pain relief was shown in all groups compared with the control. but metoclopramide 10 mg and lidocaine 40 mg pretreatment groups showed significant pain reief. Pain was relieved significantly when the drug was injected in the antecubital area. Postoperative nausea and vomiting were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Metoclopramide 10 mg or lidocaine 40 mg pretreatment to induction by propofol revealed a good analgesic effect for propofol injection pain.
Anesthesia, General
;
Anesthetics
;
Catheters
;
Humans
;
Injections, Intravenous
;
Lidocaine
;
Metoclopramide*
;
Nausea
;
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
;
Propofol*
;
Vomiting
10.Prophylactic Antiemetic Effect of Metoclopramide Against Intravenous Contrast Media-Induced Nausea in the Emergency Department.
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2011;22(3):248-252
PURPOSE: Iodine contrast media used in computed tomography (CT) often induces nausea in patients. This study evaluated the prophylactic effect of metoclopramide against nausea induced by intravenous contrast media. METHODS: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was performed in the emergency department of an urban teaching hospital. Adult patients(>15 years old), who required enhanced CT scans, were infused with 52 ml normal saline solution mixed with either 10 mg/2 ml metoclopramide or 2 ml normal saline over 10 minutes prior to the CT scan. After the scan, the patients were asked about nausea. Patients who had any other cause for their nausea or had received metoclopramide prior to the study were excluded. RESULTS: In total, 69 patients were analyzed. The metoclopramide group contained 37 patients, and the placebo group contained 32 patients. Five patients in the placebo group complained of nausea(15.6%), whereas none of the patients in the metoclopramide group experienced nausea (Fisher's exact test, p=0.018). CONCLUSION: Metoclopramide can prevent nausea induced by intravenous iodine contrast media.
Adult
;
Antiemetics
;
Contrast Media
;
Emergencies
;
Hospitals, Teaching
;
Humans
;
Iodine
;
Metoclopramide
;
Nausea
;
Prospective Studies
;
Sodium Chloride