OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide in comparison with methotrexate (MTX) on patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in China.

METHODSFive hundred and sixty-six patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were randomly assigned to receive leflunomide at 20 mg once daily or MTX at 15 mg once weekly in a controlled trial. Five hundred and four patients completed the 12-week treatment and some patients continued the treatment for 24 weeks.

RESULTSBoth leflunomide and MTX could improve the symptoms, signs, and joint function, but there were no changes in X-ray observations of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In the leflunomide group, the overall rates of effectiveness at 12 weeks and 24 weeks were 86.94% and 92.31% respectively; the rates of remarkable improvement were 64.95% and 79.81% respectively. In the MTX group, the overall rates of effectiveness at 12 weeks and 24 weeks were 84.04% and 83.15% respectively; the rates of remarkable improvement were 56.81% and 75.28% respectively. According to intent-to-treat analysis, the ACR 20% response rates at 12 weeks and 24 weeks in the leflunomide group were 62.54% and 67.18% respectively, compared with 60.08% and 61.32% respectively in MTX group. No statistical differences were shown in the efficacy between the two groups (P > 0.05). The adverse events in the leflunomide group were gastrointestinal symptoms, skin rash, alopecia, nervous system symptoms, decreased leukocyte count, and elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Most of these side effects were mild and transient. The incidence of adverse events in the leflunomide group was 16.84%, significantly lower than that in MTX group (28.17%, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONSLeflunomide is effective in the treatment of RA with less adverse events than MTX. Its efficacy is similar to MTX, but the incidence of adverse events and the rate of withdrawal due to adverse events were lower in the leflunomide group than in MTX group.

Antirheumatic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid ; drug therapy ; Female ; Growth Inhibitors ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Isoxazoles ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Methotrexate ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Middle Aged

OBJECTIVETo evaluate rates on the adverse side effect and discontinuation of second-line drugs frequently used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODEight hundred and sixty-four RA patients were studied in a retrospective program.

RESULTSUpper abdominal discomfort was most commonly seen when using second-line drugs. Rash was often associated with D-penicillamine (20.6%) and Sinomenium therapy (13.7%). Methotrexate (MTX) was uniquely characterized by substantial upper GI toxicity (32.2%) and Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. f. (TWH) (14.4%) by menstrual abnormality. Sulfasalazine users reported adverse events including upper abdominal trouble (39.0%), nausea (7.3%) and anorexia (7.3%) while the risk of GI malaise was greater. Patients taking hydroxychloroquine complained of blurred vision (19.6%) but no one went blind. Toxic side effects seemed to be the most common reasons for stoppages, and the patients taking MTX had the lowest discontinuation rate. Combination of D-penicillamine and Methotrexate did not increase the incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONSKnowledge on these different patterns of toxicity provided choices in the selection of second line agents for particular RA patients. However, long-term monitor are required when drugs are being used.

Adult ; Anorexia ; chemically induced ; Antirheumatic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid ; drug therapy ; Exanthema ; chemically induced ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Diseases ; chemically induced ; Humans ; Hydroxychloroquine ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Methotrexate ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Nausea ; chemically induced ; Penicillamine ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Phytotherapy ; Plant Preparations ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Sinomenium ; Sulfasalazine ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

The risk of lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs) has been reported to be increased in autoimmune diseases and chronic inflammatory diseases. Similar with other chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, there is a concern about the risk of LPDs in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Generally, in IBD patients, the risk of LPDs appears to be similar with or very slightly higher, compared to the general population. The association of therapeutic agents with the risk of LPDs is difficult to evaluate due to multiple other potentially involved factors and co-treatment with other agents. To date, data show that thiopurine is associated with a moderately increased risk of LPDs in patients with IBD. Evidence regarding the risk of LPDs in IBD patients using methotrexate is not sufficient, but the risk of LPDs seems low. The responsibility of anti-TNF-alpha agents on the risk of LPDs is difficult to determine, because most of IBD patients receiving anti-TNF-alpha agents are co-treated with thiopurines. Attention should be given to the high risk of hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma in young male patients treated with anti-TNF-alpha agents together with thiopurines. The risk and benefit of immunosuppressive therapy for IBD should be carefully evaluated and individualized considering the risk of LPDs.
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use ; Azathioprine/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/complications/*drug therapy ; Lymphoproliferative Disorders/chemically induced/*etiology ; Methotrexate/therapeutic use ; Risk Factors

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy with leflunomide and methotrexate in the patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA).

METHODSForty patients with active polyarthritis JRA were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (n = 21) received leflunomide tablet (1 mg/(kg x day) on days 1 - 3; then [(0.2 - 0.4) mg/kg per day] plus methotrexate (0.3 mg/kg i.v. every two weeks till clinical remission, then oral tablet 0.2 mg/kg weekly). Group 2 received the same doses of methotrexate in the same way. Permitted concomitant drugs included stable doses of NSAIDs and a low dose of prednisone during the course of treatments. The clinical assessments included the number of tender and swollen joints, tender articular index, swollen articular index, general articular function score, parents and physician's evaluation score, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum C-reactive protein and rheumatoid factor. Drug safety was assessed by observing the reaction of mucous membrane, skin, gastrointestinal tract, nervous system, hematologic changes, liver and renal function. Statistical comparison between two groups was performed by using analysis of variance, t test and chi(2) test.

RESULTSEfficacy and safety was assessed at 12th and 26th week. Average improvement rate of leflunomide plus methotrexate group at 12th week and 26th week was respectively 39.6% and 71.9%; while that of control group was 27.5% and 49.5%, i.e., there was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.01). Average remission rate of leflunomide plus methotrexate group at 12th week and 26th week was respectively 4.76% and 38.10%; while that of control group (methotrexate only) was respectively 0, 0. The clinical improvement in the group treated with leflunomide plus methotrexate was significantly greater than control group (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference (9.5% v 5.3%) in occurrence rate of side effects between the two groups. Side effects included leucocytopenia and raised aminotransferase. They were mostly mild and tolerable.

CONCLUSIONThe effect of the leflunomide and methotrexate therapy in patients with active JRA was better than methotrexate alone. The combination therapy with leflunomide and methotrexate was safe and well tolerated.

Adolescent ; Arthritis, Juvenile ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Infant ; Isoxazoles ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Methotrexate ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of single-course initial regimens in patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). In this trial (NCT01823315), 276 patients were analyzed. Patients were allocated to three initiated regimens: single-course methotrexate (MTX), single-course MTX + dactinomycin (ACTD), and multi-course MTX (control arm). The primary endpoint was the complete remission (CR) rate by initial drug(s). The primary CR rate was 64.4% with multi-course MTX in the control arm. For the single-course MTX arm, the CR rate was 35.8% by one course; it increased to 59.3% after subsequent multi-course MTX, with non-inferiority to the control (difference -5.1%,95% confidence interval (CI) -19.4% to 9.2%, P = 0.014). After further treatment with multi-course ACTD, the CR rate (93.3%) was similar to that of the control (95.2%, P = 0.577). For the single-course MTX + ACTD arm, the CR rate was 46.7% by one course, which increased to 89.1% after subsequent multi-course, with non-inferiority (difference 24.7%, 95% CI 12.8%-36.6%, P < 0.001) to the control. It was similar to the CR rate by MTX and further ACTD in the control arm (89.1% vs. 95.2%, P =0.135). Four patients experienced recurrence, with no death, during the 2-year follow-up. We demonstrated that chemotherapy initiation with single-course MTX may be an alternative regimen for patients with low-risk GTN.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects* ; Dactinomycin/adverse effects* ; Female ; Gestational Trophoblastic Disease/drug therapy* ; Humans ; Methotrexate/therapeutic use* ; Pregnancy ; Retrospective Studies

There is no consensus on whether it is safe to re-administer tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) flared after withdrawal of TNFalpha inhibitors due to active tuberculosis (TB). We evaluated the safety of restarting anti-TNFalpha therapy in patients with TNFalpha-associated TB. We used data of 1,012 patients with RA or AS treated with TNFalpha inhibitors at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital between January 2003 and July 2013 to identify patients who developed active TB. Demographic and clinical data including the results of tuberculin skin tests (TST) and interferon-gamma releasing assays (IGRA) were collected. Fifteen patients developed active TB. Five cases were occurred in RA and 10 cases in AS. Nine of 15 patients had a negative TST or IGRA and 6 TST-positive patients had received prophylaxis prior to initiating anti-TNFalpha therapy. All patients discontinued TNFalpha inhibitors with starting the treatment of TB. Eight patients were re-administered TNFalpha inhibitors due to disease flares and promptly improved without recurrence of TB. TNFalpha inhibitors could be safely resumed after starting anti-TB regimen in patients with RA or AS.
Adult ; Aged ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid/*drug therapy ; Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Immunoglobulin G/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Interferon-gamma Release Tests ; Male ; Methotrexate/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification ; Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor/therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Spondylitis, Ankylosing/*drug therapy ; Tuberculin Test ; Tuberculosis/*chemically induced/microbiology ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/*antagonists & inhibitors

Adolescent ; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Drug Interactions ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Methotrexate ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma ; drug therapy ; Sex Factors ; Tetrahydrofolates ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib (5 and 10 mg twice daily) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients with active RA was performed using the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases as well as manual searches. RESULTS: Five RCTs, including three phase-II and two phase-III trials involving 1,590 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The three phase-II RCTs included 452 patients with RA (144 patients randomized to 5 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, 156 patients randomized to 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, and 152 patients randomized to placebo) who were included in this meta-analysis. The American College of Rheumatology 20% response rate was significantly higher in the tofacitinib 5- and 10-mg groups than in the control group (relative risk [RR], 2.445; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.229 to 4.861; p = 0.011; and RR, 2.597; 95% CI, 1.514 to 4.455; p = 0.001, respectively). The safety outcomes did not differ between the tofacitinib 5- and 10-mg groups and placebo groups with the exception of infection in the tofacitinib 10-mg group (RR, 2.133; 95% CI, 1.268 to 3.590; p = 0.004). The results of two phase-III trials (1,123 patients) confirmed the findings in the phase-II studies. CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib at dosages of 5 and 10 mg twice daily was found to be effective in patients with active RA that inadequately responded to methotrexate or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and showed a manageable safety profile.
Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid/*drug therapy ; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic ; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic ; Humans ; Janus Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors ; Methotrexate/therapeutic use ; Piperidines/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Pyrimidines/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Pyrroles/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of bushen quhan zhiwang decoction (BQZD) combined methotrexate (MTX) in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODSA prospective, randomized controlled study was carried out. RA patients of Shen deficiency and cold invading syndrome in the treatment group (120 cases) were treated with BQZD and MTX (10 mg/week), while those in the control group (120 cases) were treated with MTX (10 mg/week) alone. The therapeutic course for all was 24 weeks. The efficacy and safety indices were evaluated at the baseline and 24 weeks after treatment, including clinical signs and symptoms, condition assessment, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), disease activity index 28 (DAS28), laboratory parameters of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), safety indicators, and Chinese medical syndrome integrals.

RESULTSThe total effective rate was 80. 0% in the treatment group, better than that of the control group (66.7%), showing statistical difference (P <0.01). In the two groups significant improvement of clinical signs and symptoms, ESR, CRP, visual analogue scale (VAS) by both physicians and patients, HAQ, DAS28, and Chinese medical syndrome integrals after treatment were shown (P <0.01). Better effects were obtained in the treatment group in lessening tender joint numbers and swollen joint numbers, VAS by both physicians and patients, DAS28, and Chinese medical syndrome integrals (P < 0.05). Besides, adverse reactions occurred less in the treatment group than in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSBQZD had roles in relieving symptoms, improving joint functions, signs, ESR, and CRP. It was an effective herb for RA patients of Shen deficiency and cold invading syndrome. It could enhance the efficacy and reduce adverse reactions of MTX through synergistic effects with MTX.

Adult ; Aged ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid ; diagnosis ; drug therapy ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine, Chinese Traditional ; Methotrexate ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

Acute Disease ; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic ; adverse effects ; toxicity ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Female ; Folic Acid Antagonists ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Methotrexate ; adverse effects ; toxicity ; Middle Aged ; Nausea ; chemically induced ; Risk Factors ; Skin Diseases ; chemically induced ; Vomiting ; chemically induced