Female ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; adverse effects ; Metformin ; adverse effects ; Middle Aged ; Vitamin B 12 Deficiency ; chemically induced

Antipsychotic Agents ; adverse effects ; Child ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Metabolic Syndrome ; drug therapy ; etiology ; Metformin ; therapeutic use ; Weight Gain

BACKGROUNDHyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance are present in the majority of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Both metformin and rosiglitazone can improve the ovulation and endocrine disorders of the patients. How about the combination of the two? It is rarely reported. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of metformin versus metformin plus rosiglitazone in patients with PCOS.

METHODSFifty-eight women with PCOS were randomly assigned to two groups. Metformin group (29) was treated with metformin mono-therapy and metformin plus rosiglitazone group (29) was treated with metformin plus rosiglitazone for 6 months. Treatment was discontinued once pregnancy was diagnosed.

RESULTSFasting insulin, postprandial insulin, the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), luteinizing hormone (LH), triglyceride, lower density cholesterol and testosterone level decreased significantly in both groups (P < 0.05). Metformin plus rosiglitazone had a better effect than metformin mono-therapy. Body mass index decreased by 7.8% in metformin group while no significant change in metformin plus rosiglitazone group. There were eight pregnancies, six in metformin plus rosiglitazone group (one abortion) and two in metformin group. There was no congenital anomaly at birth and seven infants developed well at one year's follow-up.

CONCLUSIONSMetformin can improve insulin resistance and imbalance of endocrine hormones. Metformin plus rosiglitazone has a more pronounced therapeutic effect and achieved more pregnancies than mono-therapy with metformin. The use of metformin and rosiglitazone before pregnancy has no obvious side effect on the development of the infants. Our study might suggest that metformin is the better choice in PCOS patients with serious obese and rosiglitazone plus metformin would be more effective in patients with severe insulin resistance or those do not respond to metformin.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Insulin Resistance ; physiology ; Luteinizing Hormone ; blood ; Metformin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome ; blood ; drug therapy ; Testosterone ; blood ; Thiazolidinediones ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Triglycerides ; blood ; Young Adult

To examine the efficacy and safety for metformin in treating antipsychotic-induced dyslipidemia.
 Methods: Two randomized placebo-controlled trials were included in the analysis. A total of 201 schizophrenia patients with dyslipidemia after treatment with an antipsychotic were collected, and the patients were divided into two groups: a 1 000 mg/d metformin group (n=103) and a placebo group (n=98). The clinical symptoms and metabolic indicators such as body weight, blood glucose, and blood lipids were assessed at baseline, the 12th week and the 24th week after treatment respectively.
 Results: After metformin treatment, the mean difference in the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) value between the metformin group and the placebo group was from 0.16 mmol/L at baseline to -0.86 mmol/L at the end of the 24th week, which was decreased by 1.02 mmol/L 
(P<0.01). At the 24th week, the LDL-C was more than 3.37 mmol/L in 25.3% patients in the metformin group, which was significantly lower than that in the placebo group (64.8%) (P<0.01). Compared with the placebo group, there were significant changes in the weight, body mass index (BMI), insulin, insulin resistance index, total cholesterol and triglyceride, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in the metformin group (all P<0.05). The treatment effects on weight and insulin resistance appeared at the 12th week and further improved at the 24th week, but the effects on improving dyslipidemia only significantly occurred at the end of the 24th week.
 Conclusion: The metformin treatment is effective in improving antipsychotic-induced dyslipidemia and insulin resistance, and the effect to reduce the antipsychotic-induced insulin resistance appears earlier than the effect to improve dyslipidemia.
Antipsychotic Agents ; adverse effects ; Blood Glucose ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Double-Blind Method ; Dyslipidemias ; chemically induced ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; Metformin ; therapeutic use

Metformin is a kind of biguanide hypoglycemic agent that has been widely used in patients with diabetes mellitus. In clinical practice, whether metformin should be stopped before Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) remains largely unclear. Some endocrinologists suggest stop metformin before FFA. However, ophthalmologists do not always adopt this opinion in their practice. This situation may lead to disputes between physicians and patients. This article analyzed contrast-induced nephropathy(CIN) and the related contrast agent, as well as the adverse reactions of fluorescein angiography. It pointed out that the discrepancy may be caused by misunderstanding of contrast agents used in FFA. For angiography using iodine contrast agent, metformin must be stopped because of the increased possibility of CIN, while for FFA using fluorescein sodium, no CIN has been reported yet. Therefore, the authors believe FFA is safe for diabetic patients with oral metformin and it is unnecessary to stop metformin before the examination.
Administration, Oral ; Contrast Media ; adverse effects ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; diagnostic imaging ; drug therapy ; Diabetic Retinopathy ; diagnostic imaging ; Fluorescein Angiography ; adverse effects ; methods ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Kidney Diseases ; chemically induced ; Metformin ; therapeutic use

BACKGROUNDAs one of most widely-used biguanides, metformin can induce the lactic acidosis in patients with renal failure though its incidence is very low. However, lactic acidemia induced by metformin was reported in patients without renal dysfunction. It is unclear that whether lactatemia exists in diabetic patients with normal renal function in Chinese or not and its influencing factors. This study aimed to clarify the influencing factors of lactic acid, and identify a practiced clinical marker to predict the hyperlactacidemia in diabetics with normal renal function.

METHODSThe clinical data and venous blood samples of 1024 type 2 diabetic patients treated with (n = 426) or without metformin (n = 599) were collected. The lactic acid was assayed by enzyme-electrode method. The biochemical indexes included creatinine (Cr) and hepatase were measured with enzymatic procedures. The lactic acid concentrations of different Cr subgroups were compared, and the correlation and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used.

RESULTSThe mean lactic acid level and the proportion of hyperlactatemia of metformin group were significantly higher than that of non-metformin group (P < 0.01), but no lactic acidosis was found in all patients. The correlation and multiple stepwise regression analysis indicated that the correlative factors of lactic acid in turn were Cr, metformin, alanine transferase (ALT), body mass index (BMI), Urine albumin (Ualb), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) in total patients; and Cr, ALT, BMI and BUN in non-metformin treated patients; Cr and ALT in metformin-group. The lactate concentration increased with the increment of Cr levels, and reached its peak at Cr 111-130 micromol/L, and the optimal cutoff of Cr in predicting hyperlactacidemia was 96.5 micromol/L.

CONCLUSIONSMetformin can increase the incidence of lactatemia in type 2 diabetic patients without renal dysfunction. Cr, ALT, and BMI are independent associated factors of blood lactic acid levels. There is low proportion of lactatemia in type 2 diabetics without metformin therapy, the optimal cutoff of Cr to predict lactatemia in these patients is 96.5 micromol/L.

Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Creatinine ; blood ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; blood ; drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Lactic Acid ; blood ; Male ; Metformin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Radioimmunoassay ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between the use of metformin and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was designed from the Fangshan family cohort in Beijing. According to metformin use at baseline, 2 625 patients with type 2 diabetes in Fangshan, Beijing were divided into metformin group or non-metformin group and the incidence of ischemic stroke between the different groups during follow-up was estimated and compared by Cox proportional hazard regression model. The participants with metformin were first compared with all the parti-cipants who did not use metformin, and then were further compared with those who did not use hypoglycemic agents and those who used other hypoglycemic agents. RESULTS: The patients with type 2 diabetes were with an average age of (59.5±8.7) years, and 41.9% of them were male. The median follow-up time was 4.5 years. A total of 84 patients developed ischemic stroke during follow-up, with a crude incidence of 6.4 (95%CI: 5.0-7.7) per 1 000 person-years. Among all the participants, 1 149 (43.8%) took metformin, 1 476 (56.2%) were metformin non-users, including 593 (22.6%) used other hypoglycemic agents, and 883 (33.6%) did not use any hypoglycemic agents. Compared with metformin non-users, the Hazard ratio (HR) for ischemic stroke in metformin users was 0.58 (95%CI: 0.36-0.93; P = 0.024). Compared with other hypoglycemic agents, HR was 0.48 (95%CI: 0.28-0.84; P < 0.01); Compared with the group without hypoglycemic agents, HR was 0.65 (95%CI: 0.37-1.13; P=0.13). The association between metformin and ischemic stroke was statistically significant in the patients ≥ 60 years old compared with all the metformin non-users and those who used other hypoglycemic agents (HR: 0.48, 95%CI: 0.25-0.92; P < 0.05). Metformin use was associated with a lower incidence of ischemic stroke in the patients with good glycemic control (0.32, 95%CI: 0.13-0.77; P < 0.05). In the patients with poor glycemic control, and the association was not statistically significant (HR: 0.97, 95%CI: 0.53-1.79; P>0.05). There was an interaction between glycemic control and metformin use on incidence of ischemic stroke (P_interaction < 0.05). The results of the sensitivity analysis were consistent with the results in the main analysis. CONCLUSION Among patients with type 2 diabetic in rural areas of northern China, metformin use was associated with lower incidence of ischemic stroke, especially in patients older than 60 years. There was an interaction between glycemic control and metformin use in the incidence of ischemic stroke.
Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Female ; Metformin/adverse effects* ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy* ; Cohort Studies ; Ischemic Stroke/complications* ; Prospective Studies ; Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects* ; Stroke/prevention & control* ; Retrospective Studies

BACKGROUNDIncretin-based therapies provide additional options for treating type 2 diabetes. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of exenatide monotherapy in obese patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODSA 26-week, metformin controlled, parallel-group study was conducted among antidiabetic drug-naive obese patients aged > 18 years, and with type 2 diabetes. Participating patients were randomly assigned to receive exenatide or metformin treatments.

RESULTSFifty-nine patients (age (50.5 ± 8.6) years, body mass index (BMI) (30.2 ± 1.6) kg/m(2), and hemoglobin A1C (HbA(1C) (8.2 ± 1.2)%) were enrolled in the study. Glucose control and weight reduction improved in both groups receiving treatment. HbA(1C) and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 2 hour glycemia reduction with exenatide was superior to that obtained with metformin ((-2.10 ± 1.79)% vs. (-1.66 ± 1.38)%, (-5.11 ± 2.68) mmol/L vs. (-2.80 ± 2.70) mmol/L, P < 0.05). Fast plasma glucose (FPG) reduction was not significantly different between the two groups ((-1.8 ± 2.0) mmol/L vs. (-1.6 ± 1.7) mmol/L, P > 0.05). Patients treated with exenatide achieved HbA(1C) of < 7% (97% of patients) and < 6.5% (79%) at end-point, vs. 93% and 73% with metformin (P > 0.05). Greater weight reduction was also achieved with exenatide ((-5.80 ± 3.66) kg) than with metformin ((-3.81 ± 1.38) kg, P < 0.01). Homeostasis model assessment of beta-cell function (HOMA-B) was not significantly increased, but the insulinogenic index and HOMA for insulin sensitivity (HOMA-S) were greatly improved in the exenatide group (P < 0.05). Nausea was the most common adverse effect in exenatide treatment (30% vs. 8%; P < 0.05), but most cases were of mild to moderate intensity. One case in the exenatide group was withdrawn early because of severe nausea. Hypoglycemia events were often observed during the first 4 weeks, with 12% of patients in the exenatide and 3.2% in metformin groups, respectively (P < 0.05). No incidents of severe hypoglycemia were reported.

CONCLUSIONSExenatide demonstrated more beneficial effects on HbA(1C), weight reduction and insulin resistance during 26 weeks of treatment, but there were more hypoglycemic events and mild-to-moderate nausea compared with metformin. These results suggested that exenatide monotherapy may provide a viable treatment option in newly developed type 2 diabetes.

Adult ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; blood ; drug therapy ; Female ; Glycated Hemoglobin A ; metabolism ; Humans ; Hypoglycemia ; chemically induced ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Insulin Resistance ; Male ; Metformin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Nausea ; chemically induced ; Obesity ; blood ; drug therapy ; Peptides ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Venoms ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Weight Loss ; drug effects

OBJECTIVETo investigate the effect of metformin in protecting against advanced glycation end products (AGEs)-induced apoptosis in human primary dermal fibroblasts.

METHODSFibroblasts were exposed to 100, 200, or 300 µg/mL AGEs, 300 µg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA), or 300 µg/mL AGEs and 1 mmol/L metformin for 24, 48, or 72 h. The exposed cells were examined for cell apoptosis using a cell counting kit. The expressions of caspase-3, Bax and Bcl-2 protein in the fibroblasts treated for 72 h were detected with Western blotting.

RESULTSAGEs exposures caused significant dose- and time-dependent apoptosis in the fibroblasts. A 72-h exposure to 300 µg/mL AGEs resulted in obviously increased apoptosis of the fibroblasts compared to the control group (0.72 ± 0.02 vs 1 ± 0.04, P<0.05), and metformin significantly decreased AGEs-induced apoptosis (0.98 ± 0.02 vs 0.72 ± 0.02, P<0.05). The expressions of caspase-3 and Bax protein were significantly increased (P<0.05) and Bcl-2 protein expression was decreased (P<0.05) with a lowered Bcl-2/Bax ratio in AGEs-treated fibroblasts (P<0.05), and such changes were significantly reversed by metformin treatment (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONMetformin can antagonize AGEs-induced apoptosis in human dermal fibroblasts by regulating the expressions of caspase-3, Bax and Bcl-2.

Apoptosis ; drug effects ; Caspase 3 ; metabolism ; Cells, Cultured ; Dermis ; cytology ; Fibroblasts ; cytology ; drug effects ; Glycation End Products, Advanced ; adverse effects ; Humans ; Metformin ; pharmacology ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2 ; metabolism ; bcl-2-Associated X Protein ; metabolism

This is a work aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the combination of metformin with glargine or with neutral protamine Hagedorn in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sixty such patients with poor glycemic control by oral antidiabetic drugs were included and divided into group A and group B. Thirty patients in group A were treated with glargine and metformin, and the other 30 patients in group B were treated with neutral protamine Hagedorn and metformin for 12 weeks. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial glucose(PPG) and HbA1c were measured before and after the treatment. Hypoglycemia was also noted. At the end of the study, the levels of FPG, PPG and HbAlc were significantly lower than the baseline levels in the two groups (P < 0.05). At the 12th week, the percentage of HbAlc < 7% in group A was 53.3% and that in group B was 40.0%; statistically, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). After the end of the treatment, there was no significant difference in that the percentage of HbA1c < 7% was 70.6% in group A and 62.5% in group B; the two groups' HbA1c levels were > or = 7%-9% at the baseline (P > 0.05). No sigificant difference in respect to the incidence rate of hypoglycemia in the two groups was noted (P > 0.05). In the cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus with poor glycaemic control by oral antidiabetic drug, glucose and HbA1c can be lowered further by the combination of metformin with glargine or with neutral protamine Hagedorn, the incidence rate of hypoglycemia is low. Metformin plus glargine or plus neutral protamine Hagedorn is a safe and effective therapeutic choice for type 2 diabetes mellitus cases with poor glycaemic control; moreover, metformin plus neutral protamine is a cheaper and effective choice.
Aged ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; drug therapy ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Insulin Glargine ; Insulin, Isophane ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Insulin, Long-Acting ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Male ; Metformin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Middle Aged