Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors that includes obesity, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Accumulating evidence implies that MetS contributes to the development and progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD); however, the factors connecting this association have not been determined. Insulin resistance (IR) is at the core of MetS and likely represent the key link between MetS and AD. In the central nervous system, insulin plays key roles in learning and memory, and AD patients exhibit impaired insulin signaling that is similar to that observed in MetS. As we face an alarming increase in obesity and T2D in all age groups, understanding the relationship between MetS and AD is vital for the identification of potential therapeutic targets. Recently, several diabetes therapies that enhance insulin signaling are being tested for a potential therapeutic benefit in AD and dementia. In this review, we will discuss MetS as a risk factor for AD, focusing on IR and the recent progress and future directions of insulin-based therapies.
Alzheimer Disease/etiology/metabolism ; Amyloid beta-Peptides/metabolism ; Animals ; Brain/metabolism ; Cognition Disorders/*etiology/*metabolism ; Humans ; Insulin/metabolism ; *Insulin Resistance ; Metabolic Syndrome X/complications/drug therapy/*metabolism ; Molecular Targeted Therapy ; Signal Transduction/drug effects ; tau Proteins/metabolism

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This multicenter, open-labeled, randomized trial was performed to compare the effects of rosuvastatin 10 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg on lipid and glycemic control in Korean patients with nondiabetic metabolic syndrome. METHODS: In total, 351 patients who met the modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) criteria for metabolic syndrome with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels > or = 130 mg/dL were randomized to receive either rosuvastatin 10 mg (n = 173) or atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 178) for over 6 weeks. RESULTS: After 6 weeks of treatment, greater reductions in total cholesterol (- 35.94 +/- 11.38 vs. - 30.07 +/- 10.46%, p < 0.001), LDL-C (48.04 +/- 14.45 vs. 39.52 +/- 14.42%, p < 0.001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (- 42.93 +/- 13.15 vs. - 35.52 +/- 11.76%, p < 0.001), and apolipoprotein-B (- 38.7 +/- 18.85 vs. - 32.57 +/- 17.56%, p = 0.002) levels were observed in the rosuvastatin group as compared to the atorvastatin group. Overall, the percentage of patients attaining the NCEP ATP III goal was higher with rosuvastatin as compared to atorvastatin (87.64 vs. 69.88%, p < 0.001). Changes in glucose and insulin levels, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index were not significantly different between the two groups. The safety and tolerability of the two agents were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Rosuvastatin 10 mg was more effective than atorvastatin 10 mg in achieving NCEP ATP III LDL-C goals in patients with nondiabetic metabolic syndrome, especially in those with lower NCEP ATP III target level goals.
Blood Glucose/metabolism ; Cholesterol, LDL/blood ; Female ; Fluorobenzenes/*administration & dosage ; Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated/metabolism ; Heptanoic Acids/*administration & dosage ; Humans ; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/*administration & dosage ; Hypercholesterolemia/blood/complications/*drug therapy ; Hyperglycemia/blood/complications/*drug therapy ; Insulin/blood ; Male ; Metabolic Syndrome X/blood/complications/*drug therapy ; Middle Aged ; Pyrimidines/*administration & dosage ; Pyrroles/*administration & dosage ; Sulfonamides/*administration & dosage ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of metformin plus megestrol acetate (MA) with that of MA alone for treating endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH). METHODS: This pilot study included 16 EAH patients who met at least one metabolic syndrome (MS) criterion and received either adjunctive metformin plus MA (MET group) or MA monotherapy (MA group). Each patient in the MA group received 160 mg of MA daily, whereas patients in the MET group received the same dose of MA plus 0.5 g of metformin thrice daily. Treatment response was assessed by histological examination of dilation and curettage specimens obtained after 12 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: Each group had eight patients, and half of the patients in each group were diagnosed with MS. The complete response (CR) rate was 75% (6/8) in the MET group and 25% (2/8) in the MA group (p=0.105). Complications of MS did not affect the response rates in either group. In the MET group, 75% (3/4) of the patients had CR in the presence or absence of MS. In the MA group, 50% (2/4) of the patients with MS had CR, whereas no patient without MS had CR. No irreversible toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: Metformin plus MA may be a potential alternative therapy for treating EAH, and the MS status of patients may have no effect on the efficacy of metformin plus MA therapy.
Adult ; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/*therapeutic use ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Endometrial Hyperplasia/complications/*drug therapy/metabolism ; Female ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents/*therapeutic use ; Megestrol Acetate/*therapeutic use ; Metabolic Syndrome X/complications/metabolism ; Metformin/*therapeutic use ; Pilot Projects ; Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism ; Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism ; Single-Blind Method ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: In the present study, we tested whether the presence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) would worsen the features of inflammation, plasma omega 3 fatty acid levels and antioxidant potential in treated hypertensive patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups were classified by the components of MetS: a reference group of treated hypertensive subjects: hypertension (HTN) group (n = 39) and with more than two additional MetS components: HTN with Mets group (n = 40). We further compared the parameters between HTN group and HTN with MetS group. RESULTS: The results showed that age (p < 0.001) and body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.001) were significantly different between HTN group and HTN with MetS group. Age- and BMI-adjusted total radical trapping antioxidant potential (TRAP) (p < 0.01) was significantly lower, whereas age- and BMI-adjusted CD (p < 0.05) and interleukin (IL) 6 (p < 0.05) were significantly higher in HTN with MetS group than in HTN group. Moreover, HTN with MetS group had significantly lower levels of age- and BMI-adjusted plasma phospholipid eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) than HTN group (p < 0.05). On the other hand, the levels of age- and BMI-adjusted intracellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), adiponectin and high molecular weight (HMW)-adiponectin were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our results showed increased inflammatory marker, reduced antioxidant potential and EPA levels in treated hypertensive patients in the presence of MetS, suggesting the importance of changes of therapeutic lifestyle to modify the features of MetS.
Adiponectin/blood ; Age Factors ; Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use ; Antioxidants/*metabolism ; Body Mass Index ; Eicosapentaenoic Acid/*blood ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension/*blood/drug therapy/*immunology ; Inflammation/*immunology ; Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1/blood ; Interleukin-6/blood ; Male ; Metabolic Syndrome X/blood/*complications/immunology ; Middle Aged