Objective To analyze the serum gastric function and Helicobacter pylori ( HP ) infection in patients with gastric hyperplastic polyps and gastric fundic gland polyps.Methods From December 2017 to December 2018, 135 patients with gastric polyps and pathologically confirmed gastric hyperplastic polyps and gastric fundic gland polyps were enrolled in the hospital of Xuzhou Medical University.Among them, 68 patients with hyperplastic polyps, 67 cases of the gastric fundic gland polyps.Serum Hp antibodies ( UreA, UreB, VacA, CagA antibodies ) were qualitatively detected by immunoblotting.Eighty patients with chronic superficial gastritis were selected as the control group.Three groups of serum pepsinogen?I ( PG?I),pepsinogen?Ⅱ( PG?Ⅱ),gastrin were detected by enzyme?linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).Gastrin?17( G?17) and calculate PGⅠ and PGⅡ ratio( PGR).Results The levels of serum PGⅡ(13.13(8.15,20.30) μg ／L) and G17 (8.44(3.72,27.17) pmol／L) in the gastric hyperplastic polyp group were higher than those in the control group (9.16(5.56,15.14) μg／L and 1.83(0.87,5.95) pmol／L) ( P＜0.05),and the PGR level was lower than the control group ( P＜0.05);serum PGI ( 120.12 ( 86.72,174.70) μg／L), PGII ( 11.92 ( 7.27,22.26) μg／L),G17 ( 5.68 ( 1.79, 14.65) pmol／L) in the gastric fundic gland polyp group was higher than the control group (( 101.32 (79.17,131.33) μg ／L,9.16 ( 5.56,15.14) μg ／L,1.83 ( 0.87,5.95) pmol／L) ( P 均＜0.05)) ( P＜0.05); serum G17 (8.44(3.72,27.17) pmol／L) level in gastric hyperplastic polyp group was higher than gastric fundus polyp group (5.68(1.79,14.65) pmol／L) ( P＜0.05); Hp infection rate in gastric hyperplastic polyp group61.76%(42／68)was higher than that in the gastric fundic gland polyp group40.30%(27／67) (P＜0.05),and type I Hp was the main one (P＜0.05).The serum PGⅡ and G17 levels in the gastric hyperplastic polyp group were higher than those of Hp negative ( all P＜0.05).There were no significant differences in serum PGI, PGⅡ, G17, and PGR levels between the HP?positive and negative?positive patients in the gastric fundus polyp group.The serum PGI and PGR levels in the hypertrophic polyp group were higher than those in the HPⅡ type ( all P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in the levels of serum PGⅠ,PGⅡ,G17,and PGR between the gastric fundic gland polyps group and the type Ⅱ.Conclusion Serum PG and G17 levels in patients with gastric hypertrophic polyps and gastric fundic gland polyps are higher than those in patients with chronic superficial gastritis.Patients with gastric hyperplastic polyps have higher HP infection rate and abnormal gastric function than gastric fundic gland polyps.

Thoracentesis is common in daily medical practice. During the operation, it is easy to cause complications such as re-expansion pulmonary edema, pulmonary hypotension, liver and spleen injury, pleural reaction, intercostal artery injury, pneumothorax, and so on. If the operator does not master procedures properly, it is easy to damage the thoracic organs. Therefore, the department of the general practice of the First Hospital of Jiaxing improved the puncture needle device based on thoracic puncture cannula, developed a new type of disposable thoracic puncture cannula, and obtained the National Utility Model Patent of China (patent number: ZL 2019 2 2112955.7). New type of disposable thoracic puncture cannula comprises a flexible puncture cannula, a steel needle, a limit structure, and a second bolt. In the process of puncture, the length of the puncture is limited by the limit structure. If the puncture force is too strong, the limit structure will prevent further penetration of the needle. The device is easy to use, flexible to operate, easy to master, and can reduce the risk of thoracentesis, which is worth of clinical promotion.

Objective:To compare the dosimetric characteristics of helical tomotherapy (HT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) after left breast conserving surgery.Methods:Twenty-four patients with left breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery who were admitted to the Department of Radiation Oncology of Tumor Hospital of Yunnan Province from May 2016 to May 2019 were selected. The HT plan and the VMAT plan were designed for the same patient. The target dose and the dose volume parameters of organs at risk were compared and analyzed in the two radiotherapy plans.Results:There were significant differences in the D 2% [(59.68±0.46) Gy vs. (60.06±0.20) Gy, t=-4.229, P<0.001], D 98% [(57.46±0.44) Gy vs. (57.20±0.07) Gy, t=2.912, P<0.001], conformity index (CI) (0.80±0.05 vs. 0.76±0.04, t=4.079, P<0.001) and homogeneity index (HI) (0.04±0.01 vs. 0.05±0.00, t=-5.505, P<0.001) of the planning gross tumor volume (PGTV) between the HT and VMAT plans. However, there was no significant difference in the D 50% [(58.77±0.46) Gy vs. (58.75±0.11) Gy, t=0.179, P=0.859]. There were significant differences in the D 50% [(51.99±0.39) Gy vs. (52.39±0.36) Gy, t=-5.278, P<0.001], D 98% [(49.46±0.29) Gy vs. (48.35±0.46) Gy, t=9.538, P<0.001] and HI (0.19±0.01 vs. 0.21±0.01, t=-7.538, P<0.001) of the planned target volume (PTV) between the two plans. However, there were no significant differences in the D 2% [(59.13±0.64) Gy vs. (59.09±0.46) Gy, t=0.511, P=0.614] and CI (0.83±0.04 vs. 0.82±0.04, t=1.637, P=0.115). In terms of organs at risk, there were significant differences in the V 5 [(57.90±1.42)% vs. (52.40±5.74)%, t=4.812, P<0.001], V 20 [(22.40±2.17)% vs. (18.40±3.16)%, t=5.573, P<0.001] and D mean [(12.71±0.55) Gy vs. (11.46±1.26) Gy, t=4.963, P<0.001] of left lung, D mean of right lung [(3.42±0.27) Gy vs. (2.49±0.24) Gy, t=13.310, P<0.001], D mean of right breast [(4.41±0.50) Gy vs. (3.12±0.65) Gy, t=10.326, P<0.001], V 30 [(0.55±0.37)% vs. (1.24±1.11)%, t=-4.020, P=0.001] and D mean of heart [(4.68±0.62) Gy vs. (3.83±0.88) Gy, t=7.335, P<0.001], D mean of left atrium [(2.53±0.31) Gy vs. (2.16±0.28) Gy, t=5.488, P<0.001], D mean of right atrium [(2.77±0.43) Gy vs. (2.20±0.30) Gy, t=7.103, P<0.001], D mean of right ventricle [(5.10±0.72) Gy vs. (3.72±0.94) Gy, t=9.802, P<0.001] and D 2% of spinal cord [(14.79±2.73) Gy vs. (5.42±2.23) Gy, t=14.788, P<0.001] between HT and VMAT plans. There was no significant difference in the D mean of left ventricle [(5.10±1.19) Gy vs. (4.80±1.54) Gy, t=1.250, P=0.224]. Conclusion:Both the HT plan and the VMAT plan can meet the treatment requirements. The HT plan can provide better target area conformity and dose uniformity. The VMAT plan has more advantages in terms of organs at risk. The HT plan shows an advantage only in exposure to high-dose area.