1.Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal mesothelioma.
Grace H C TAN ; Michelle CHEUNG ; Jendana CHANYAPUTHIPONG ; Khee Chee SOO ; Melissa C C TEO
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2013;42(6):291-296
INTRODUCTIONPeritoneal mesothelioma is a rare neoplasm. Due to the limited understanding of its biology and behaviour, peritoneal mesothelioma poses a diagnostic and management challenge. The management of peritoneal mesothelioma has been controversial; systemic chemotherapy, palliative surgery and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been described.
MATERIALS AND METHODSThis study shares our experience with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for 5 out of the 6 cases of peritoneal mesotheliomas treated surgically, at a single institution in Singapore over the past 2 years. Computed tomography (CT) scans, positron emission tomography (PET)-CT scans and tumour markers were performed preoperatively but were not conclusive for the disease. All 6 cases presented to the Department of Surgical Oncology at National Cancer Centre Singapore, were diagnosed by histology of intraoperative biopsies. The combination of aggressive cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC was performed in 5 patients, with abandonment of procedure in 1 with extensive disease, who was treated with systemic chemotherapy instead.
RESULTSMedian duration of surgery, median length of hospital stay, and median follow-up duration were 7.04 hours, 11 days, and 15 months respectively. One postoperative morbidity relating to chemical peritonitis required exploratory laparotomy with good outcome. There were no mortality. All patients are alive at the last follow-up with no evidence of recurrences at 4 to 31 months from the time of their surgery.
CONCLUSIONPeritoneal mesothelioma is a rare disease that requires early diagnosis and can be effectively treated by CRS and HIPEC in selected group of patients.
Adult ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; administration & dosage ; Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion ; methods ; Cryosurgery ; methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Hyperthermia, Induced ; methods ; Male ; Mesothelioma ; diagnosis ; therapy ; Middle Aged ; Peritoneal Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; therapy ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
2.External Validation of the ELAPSS Score for Prediction of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Growth Risk
Mayte Sánchez VAN KAMMEN ; Jacoba P GREVING ; Satoshi KURODA ; Daina KASHIWAZAKI ; Akio MORITA ; Yoshiaki SHIOKAWA ; Toshikazu KIMURA ; Christophe COGNARD ; Anne C JANUEL ; Antti LINDGREN ; Timo KOIVISTO ; Juha E JÄÄSKELÄINEN ; Antti RONKAINEN ; Liisa PYYSALO ; Juha ÖHMAN ; Melissa RAHI ; Johanna KUHMONEN ; Jaakko RINNE ; Eva L LEEMANS ; Charles B MAJOIE ; W Peter VANDERTOP ; Dagmar VERBAAN ; Yvo B W E M ROOS ; René VAN DEN BERG ; Hieronymus D BOOGAARTS ; Walid MOUDROUS ; Ido R VAN DEN WIJNGAARD ; Laura ten HOVE ; Mario TEO ; Edward J ST GEORGE ; Katharina A M HACKENBERG ; Amr ABDULAZIM ; Nima ETMINAN ; Gabriël J E RINKEL ; Mervyn D I VERGOUWEN
Journal of Stroke 2019;21(3):340-346
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prediction of intracranial aneurysm growth risk can assist physicians in planning of follow-up imaging of conservatively managed unruptured intracranial aneurysms. We therefore aimed to externally validate the ELAPSS (Earlier subarachnoid hemorrhage, aneurysm Location, Age, Population, aneurysm Size and Shape) score for prediction of the risk of unruptured intracranial aneurysm growth. METHODS: From 11 international cohorts of patients ≥18 years with ≥1 unruptured intracranial aneurysm and ≥6 months of radiological follow-up, we collected data on the predictors of the ELAPSS score, and calculated 3- and 5-year absolute growth risks according to the score. Model performance was assessed in terms of calibration (predicted versus observed risk) and discrimination (c-statistic). RESULTS: We included 1,072 patients with a total of 1,452 aneurysms. During 4,268 aneurysm-years of follow-up, 199 (14%) aneurysms enlarged. Calibration was comparable to that of the development cohort with the overall observed risks within the range of the expected risks. The c-statistic was 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.73) at 3 years, compared to 0.72 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.76) in the development cohort. At 5 years, the c-statistic was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.72), compared to 0.72 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.75) in the development cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The ELAPSS score showed accurate calibration for 3- and 5-year risks of aneurysm growth and modest discrimination in our external validation cohort. This indicates that the score is externally valid and could assist patients and physicians in predicting growth of unruptured intracranial aneurysms and plan follow-up imaging accordingly.
Aneurysm
;
Calibration
;
Cohort Studies
;
Discrimination (Psychology)
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Intracranial Aneurysm
;
Risk Factors
;
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage