1.Serum Glucose Concentrations Predicting in the Old Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
Hang GAO ; Xin HE ; Guizhou TAO ; Hongyu CAI ; Meiting YANG
China Modern Doctor 2009;47(17):1-2,24
Objective To assess the predictive value of FBG concentration in-hospital outcome in the old patients with AMI.Methods 256 old patients (≥60 years old) with AMI precluding that with history of diabetes were divided into two groups according to serum FBG level:group A,n = 136,FBG ≥7.0mmol/L;group B,n = 120,FBG < 7.0mmol/L FBG concentrations after 7 days,mortality and total cardiac affairs in-hospital were recorded. Results:Among the two group,there were no significance in age,history of hypertension,hyperlipdemia. Compared with group B,the patients with high FBG levels in 7th day were more than group A, about 21% of group A(P< 0.05). Numbers of disease vessels were more than group A(P < 0.05). Cardiac shock,in-hospital mortality and total cordial affairs were significanfly higher in group A(12%vs0% in cardiac shock, 12%vs4% in mortality ,61%vs34% in MACE)(P< 0.05). Conclusion A part of the old patient with high FBG concentrations and AMI have impaired glucose metabolism, admission glucose levels are predictive for in hospital mortality and total cardial affairs.
2.Application of recognizing bone species by touching blindly in experimental teaching of human anatomy
Taoqi TAO ; Meiting WANG ; Yaozhu HUANG ; Jianhuan REN ; Lijia YAO ; Jing LIU ; Lingfeng CHEN ; Junhua YANG
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 2020;19(10):1117-1120
Objective:To propose the application of recognizing bone species by touching blindly (ARBTB) and verify its application effect in human anatomy experimental courses.Methods:The study included experiment 1 and experiment 2, and the research objects were 60 students majoring in clinical medicine in Batch 2019 and 60 students majoring in preventive medicine in Batch 2018, respectively. The research objects in each experiment were randomized into mainstream teaching method group and ARBTB group, with 30 students in each group. In experiment 1, after students studying for the same hours, both of two groups carried out the same test, and then the average scores of the two groups were compared. In experiment 2, the average time spent by the two groups of students in osteology learning was compared.Results:In experiment 1, ARBTB group's average score of the test was significantly higher than that of the mainstream teaching group ( P<0.001). In experiment 2, the ARBTB group took much less time in osteology learning than the mainstream teaching group ( P<0.001). Conclusion:Compared with the mainstream teaching method, ARBTB is more effective in osteology learning, which is worth popularizing.