Objective To explore the uranium concentration in surface water and drinking water in Beijing, China and the relationship between uranium concentration and gross α activity concentration. Methods Water samples were collected from 16 districts in Beijing. Uranium concentration and gross α activity concentration were measured with WGJ-III trace uranium analyzer and LB6008 six-channel α/β counter using the ultraviolet fluorescence and thick source methods. Results The uranium concentrations in surface water and drinking water were 1.131 and 1.572 μg/L, respectively. The gross α activity concentrations in surface water and drinking water were 0.059 and 0.074 Bq/L, respectively. There were no significant differences in uranium concentration and gross α activity concentration between surface water and drinking water (P > 0.05). The uranium concentration was positively correlated with the gross α activity concentration, with a correlation coefficient of 0.700 (P < 0.05). The gross α activity concentration was determined by the uranium concentration with a determination coefficient of 48%. The committed effective dose of ²³⁸U in drinking water was between 3.284 × 10⁻⁵ and 1.640 × 10⁻³ mSv, with an average value of 5.400 × 10⁻⁴ mSv. Conclusion The uranium concentration and gross α activity in the surface water and drinking water in Beijing fluctuate and remain in the background range. These values are much lower than the recommended limits of 0.03 mg/L and 0.5 Bq/L stipulated in the GB 5749-2021 Standard for Drinking Water Quality. The annual committed effective dose of ²³⁸U through drinking water ingestion is very small.

Objective To understand the effects of ²⁴¹Am standard material powder with different matrices on the determination of gross alpha activity in water, and to provide a reference for the selection and use of alpha standard sources. Methods The alpha counting efficiency of ²⁴¹Am standard material powder with different matrices was measured by low-background alpha and beta measuring instrument. The radiochemical recovery rate and whole process efficiency of gross alpha activity in water were determined by spike experiments. Results The alpha counting efficiency of the ²⁴¹Am standard material powder with four matrices was in the descending order of calcium carbonate, calcium carbonate and silica mixed matrix, calcium sulfate, and silica. The default chemical recovery rate is 1 when gross alpha activity in water is measured by thick source method. The use of ²⁴¹Am standard material with calcium carbonate as a matrix resulted in about 35% decrease in gross alpha activity, and about 10% deviation was observed using ²⁴¹Am standard material with silica or calcium carbonate and silica mixed matrices. The whole process efficiency of alpha activity in four spiked water samples with ²⁴¹Am standard solution and ²⁴¹Am standard material powder with calcium carbonate, silica, or mixed matrix was 6.34%-7.30%. Conclusion Standard materials with different matrices demonstrate different self-absorption of alpha particles and various influence on the chemical recovery. When purchasing and using standard material powders for alpha activity measurement in laboratories, the composition of the matrix should be clarified as much as possible, and the gross alpha activity in water should be determined by measuring the whole process efficiency if necessary.

Objective To investigate the method of tube furnace oxidation combustion and liquid scintillation counting for the determination of carbon-14 in seafood, and to provide technical support for the monitoring of carbon-14 in seafood. Methods By studying the pyrolysis characteristics of five types of dried seafood samples, including yellow croaker, white shrimp, swimming crab, clam, and seaweed, a temperature control program suitable for the oxidation combustion of seafood was established. The combustion efficiency, carbon element recovery rate, and the accuracy and precision of the method were determined. Results The combustion efficiency was more than 98% for most seafood using the recommended combustion program. The recovery rate of carbon was similar to that calculated by glucose combustion; both were more than 95%. Four laboratories validated the accuracy of the method by measuring the carbon-14 activity concentration in the Chinese sugar carbon standard material. The relative errors ranged from 1.03% to 3.41% and the average relative error was 2.36%. The precision of this method was verified by measuring the carbon-14 activity concentration in yellow croaker samples. The within-laboratory relative standard deviation ranged from 5.11% to 9.35% and the between-laboratories relative standard deviation was 4.04%. Conclusion The tube furnace oxidation combustion and liquid scintillation counting method was used to determine the activity concentration of carbon-14 in seafood. The recommended oxidation combustion program is more targeted and less time-consuming. The accuracy and precision of this method meet the requirements. This method is suitable for the determination of carbon-14 in seafood.