1.Effectiveness of intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel® ) versus percutaneous laser disc decompression in patients with chronic radicular low back pain
Masoud HASHEMI ; Payman DADKHAH ; Mehrdad TAHERI ; Pegah KATIBEH ; Saman ASADI
The Korean Journal of Pain 2020;33(1):66-72
Background:
Low back pain secondary to discopathy is a common pain disorder.Multiple minimally invasive therapeutic modalities have been proposed; however, to date no study has compared percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) with intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel® ). We are introducing the first study on patient-reported outcomes of DiscoGel® vs. PLDD for radiculopathy.
Methods:
Seventy-two patients were randomly selected from either a previous strategy of PLDD or DiscoGel® , which had been performed in our center during 2016-2017. Participants were asked about their numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, and progression to secondary treatment.
Results:
The mean NRS scores in the total cohort before intervention was 8.0, and was reduced to 4.3 in the DiscoGel® group and 4.2 in the PLDD group after 12 months, which was statistically significant. The mean ODI score before intervention was 81.25% which was reduced to 41.14% in the DiscoGel® group and 52.86% in the PLDD group after 12 months, which was statistically significant. Between-group comparison of NRS scores after two follow-ups were not statistically different (P = 0.62) but the ODI score in DiscoGel® was statistically lower (P = 0.001). Six cases (16.67%) from each group reported undergoing surgery after the follow-up period which was not statistically different.
Conclusions
Both techniques were equivalent in pain reduction but DiscoGel®had a greater effect on decreasing disability after 12 months, although the rate of progression to secondary treatments and/or surgery was almost equal in the two groups.
2.Spiritual Therapy in Coping with Cancer as a Complementary Medical Preventive Practice.
Abolfazl MOVAFAGH ; Mohammad Hassan HEIDARI ; Morteza ABDOLJABBARI ; Neda MANSOURI ; Afsoon TAGHAVI ; Aliasghar KARAMATINIA ; Narjes MEHRVAR ; Mehrdad HASHEMI ; Mona GHAZI
Journal of Cancer Prevention 2017;22(2):82-88
There are many of methods of treating cancer. However, the concept of curing the cancer is beyond our current knowledge. Some patients who have the cancer may seek an alternative manner of curing their disease. Alternative medicines, such as spiritual and complementary therapy, are able to cure the cancer and, at the least, are safe. Research on the importance of spirituality in cancer care has mainly been performed in geographically heterogeneous populations. The results are limited to these specific religious-cultural contexts and enlightened by contributions from ethnicity and religion. This article focused on the religiousness and spiritual support of cancer patients from diverse and heterogeneous groups around the globe. An electronic search of peer-reviewed articles was systematically performed to obtain the relevant literature with the CINAHL, PsycINFO, and PubMed databases. The keywords included religion, cancer, illness, psychotherapy, and spiritual and alternative treatment/therapies. The inclusion criteria for the reviews were that the documents were original quantitative research and published in English. Articles that were not directly relevant to the present objective were excluded. The present outcome of these review resources suggest that it may be helpful for clinicians to address spirituality, particularly with regard to prevention, healing, and survival of cancer patients. This article indicates that it may be useful for clinical oncologists to be informed of the prevalence of the use of spiritual medicine in their specialized field. In addition, patients should routinely be asked about the use of spiritual medicine as part of every cancer patient' evaluation.
Delivery of Health Care
;
Humans
;
Prevalence
;
Psychotherapy
;
Spirituality