1.Surgical Outcomes of Endoscopic Endonasal Versus Transcranial Resections of Adult Craniopharyngioma: A Meta-Analysis
Wardah RAFAQAT ; Mohammad Hamza BAJWA ; Meher ANGEZ ; Syed Ather ENAM
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2022;10(4):226-236
Background:
The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been gaining popularity for resection of adult craniopharyngiomas. However, the safety and effectiveness of the procedure in comparison to the traditional transcranial approach (TCA) remains unestablished as previous reviews are outdated.
Methods:
A literature search without language restriction was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane database, and Web of Science from conception to July 9, 2021. Cohort studies and case series that compared EEA with TCA and assessed postoperative complications, recurrence, and 30-day mortality were included. Articles, where data for adult populations could not be extracted or calculated, were excluded. Article selection and data extraction in a predesigned data extraction form were conducted in duplicate. Pooled participant data were included in a random-effects model.
Results:
The search yielded 227 articles, from which eight cohort studies containing 11,395 patients were included (EEA: 6,614 patients, TCA: 4,781 patients). Six studies were good quality and two were fair quality according to the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. There were significantly higher rates of cerebrospinal fluid leak (risk ratio [RR]=0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17–0.32, p<0.00001, I2 =0%) and lower rates of postoperative hypopituitarism (RR=1.40, 95% CI 1.30–1.51, p<0.00001, I2 =0%), hydrocephalus (RR=6.95, 95% CI 5.78–8.36, p<0.00001, I2 =0%), visual impairment (RR=1.52, 95% CI 1.34–1.73, p<0.00001, I2 =0%), and 30-day mortality (RR=5.63, 95% CI 3.87–8.19, p<0.00001, I2 =0%) after EEA. Non-significant lower rates of postoperative diabetes insipidus (RR=1.12, 95% CI 0.78–1.61, p=0.53, I2 =85%) and recurrence of tumor (RR=2.69, 95% CI 0.35–20.81, p=0.34, I2 =47%) were seen after EEA.
Conclusion
EEA may be associated with reduced postoperative hypopituitarism, hydrocephalus, visual impairment, and 30-day mortality and higher rates of cerebrospinal fluid leak. These findings do not account for differences in tumor size and extension between the EEA and TCA cohorts. Further research on patients with comparable tumor characteristics is required to fully assess outcomes.
2.Second Primary Tumors After Primary Brain Tumors and Vice Versa: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study
Meher ANGEZ ; Rabeet TARIQ ; Alveena ZAFAR ; Ali Azan AHMED ; Ayesha Nasir HAMEED ; Usama WAQAR ; Syed Ather ENAM
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2025;13(1):17-22
Background:
Advancements in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy have improved survivalfor brain tumor patients, increasing the risk of second primary tumors (SPTs) among long-term survivors. This study examines the types and risks of SPTs in brain tumor patients presenting at a tertiary care hospital.
Methods:
This single-center, retrospective study explored occurrences of SPTs following prima-ry brain tumors and occurrences of brain tumors as SPTs following primary extra neural tumors. A total of 41 patients were included and analyzed presenting with histologically confirmed SPTs between 1st January 2000 and 31st December 2020.
Results:
The study included 41 patients with SPTs, primarily female (65.9%). Of these, 20 pa-tients (48.7%) developed SPTs after a primary brain tumor, while 21 patients (51.2%) developed brain tumors as SPTs after extra-neural tumors. Among patients who developed SPTs after brain tumors (n=20), meningioma (n=8, 40.0%) and pituitary adenoma (n=6, 30.0%) were the most prevalent first primary tumors (FPTs) while breast tumors predominated as SPTs (n=4, 20.0%). Survival analysis indicated younger mean age (44.5 years) for patients marked alive, compared to those marked deceased (57.0 years) and those with unknown outcomes (63.0 years).
Conclusion
Based on this retrospective analysis, the median age at diagnosis was 44.5 years,with a considerable number of patients (36.6%) having uncertain outcomes at follow-up due to incomplete records. These findings highlight the need for improved follow-up data management to better assess long-term survival in patients with SPTs following brain tumors.
3.Second Primary Tumors After Primary Brain Tumors and Vice Versa: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study
Meher ANGEZ ; Rabeet TARIQ ; Alveena ZAFAR ; Ali Azan AHMED ; Ayesha Nasir HAMEED ; Usama WAQAR ; Syed Ather ENAM
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2025;13(1):17-22
Background:
Advancements in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy have improved survivalfor brain tumor patients, increasing the risk of second primary tumors (SPTs) among long-term survivors. This study examines the types and risks of SPTs in brain tumor patients presenting at a tertiary care hospital.
Methods:
This single-center, retrospective study explored occurrences of SPTs following prima-ry brain tumors and occurrences of brain tumors as SPTs following primary extra neural tumors. A total of 41 patients were included and analyzed presenting with histologically confirmed SPTs between 1st January 2000 and 31st December 2020.
Results:
The study included 41 patients with SPTs, primarily female (65.9%). Of these, 20 pa-tients (48.7%) developed SPTs after a primary brain tumor, while 21 patients (51.2%) developed brain tumors as SPTs after extra-neural tumors. Among patients who developed SPTs after brain tumors (n=20), meningioma (n=8, 40.0%) and pituitary adenoma (n=6, 30.0%) were the most prevalent first primary tumors (FPTs) while breast tumors predominated as SPTs (n=4, 20.0%). Survival analysis indicated younger mean age (44.5 years) for patients marked alive, compared to those marked deceased (57.0 years) and those with unknown outcomes (63.0 years).
Conclusion
Based on this retrospective analysis, the median age at diagnosis was 44.5 years,with a considerable number of patients (36.6%) having uncertain outcomes at follow-up due to incomplete records. These findings highlight the need for improved follow-up data management to better assess long-term survival in patients with SPTs following brain tumors.
4.Second Primary Tumors After Primary Brain Tumors and Vice Versa: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study
Meher ANGEZ ; Rabeet TARIQ ; Alveena ZAFAR ; Ali Azan AHMED ; Ayesha Nasir HAMEED ; Usama WAQAR ; Syed Ather ENAM
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2025;13(1):17-22
Background:
Advancements in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy have improved survivalfor brain tumor patients, increasing the risk of second primary tumors (SPTs) among long-term survivors. This study examines the types and risks of SPTs in brain tumor patients presenting at a tertiary care hospital.
Methods:
This single-center, retrospective study explored occurrences of SPTs following prima-ry brain tumors and occurrences of brain tumors as SPTs following primary extra neural tumors. A total of 41 patients were included and analyzed presenting with histologically confirmed SPTs between 1st January 2000 and 31st December 2020.
Results:
The study included 41 patients with SPTs, primarily female (65.9%). Of these, 20 pa-tients (48.7%) developed SPTs after a primary brain tumor, while 21 patients (51.2%) developed brain tumors as SPTs after extra-neural tumors. Among patients who developed SPTs after brain tumors (n=20), meningioma (n=8, 40.0%) and pituitary adenoma (n=6, 30.0%) were the most prevalent first primary tumors (FPTs) while breast tumors predominated as SPTs (n=4, 20.0%). Survival analysis indicated younger mean age (44.5 years) for patients marked alive, compared to those marked deceased (57.0 years) and those with unknown outcomes (63.0 years).
Conclusion
Based on this retrospective analysis, the median age at diagnosis was 44.5 years,with a considerable number of patients (36.6%) having uncertain outcomes at follow-up due to incomplete records. These findings highlight the need for improved follow-up data management to better assess long-term survival in patients with SPTs following brain tumors.