2.Conservative therapy with metformin plus megestrol acetate for endometrial atypical hyperplasia.
Weiwei SHAN ; Chao WANG ; Zhenbo ZHANG ; Chao GU ; Chengcheng NING ; Xuezhen LUO ; Qiongjie ZHOU ; Xiaojun CHEN
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2014;25(3):214-220
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of metformin plus megestrol acetate (MA) with that of MA alone for treating endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH). METHODS: This pilot study included 16 EAH patients who met at least one metabolic syndrome (MS) criterion and received either adjunctive metformin plus MA (MET group) or MA monotherapy (MA group). Each patient in the MA group received 160 mg of MA daily, whereas patients in the MET group received the same dose of MA plus 0.5 g of metformin thrice daily. Treatment response was assessed by histological examination of dilation and curettage specimens obtained after 12 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: Each group had eight patients, and half of the patients in each group were diagnosed with MS. The complete response (CR) rate was 75% (6/8) in the MET group and 25% (2/8) in the MA group (p=0.105). Complications of MS did not affect the response rates in either group. In the MET group, 75% (3/4) of the patients had CR in the presence or absence of MS. In the MA group, 50% (2/4) of the patients with MS had CR, whereas no patient without MS had CR. No irreversible toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: Metformin plus MA may be a potential alternative therapy for treating EAH, and the MS status of patients may have no effect on the efficacy of metformin plus MA therapy.
Adult
;
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/*therapeutic use
;
Drug Therapy, Combination
;
Endometrial Hyperplasia/complications/*drug therapy/metabolism
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Hypoglycemic Agents/*therapeutic use
;
Megestrol Acetate/*therapeutic use
;
Metabolic Syndrome X/complications/metabolism
;
Metformin/*therapeutic use
;
Pilot Projects
;
Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism
;
Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism
;
Single-Blind Method
;
Treatment Outcome
3.Safety of Megestrol Acetate in Palliating Anorexia-Cachexia Syndrome in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
Sungwoo HONG ; In Gab JEONG ; Dalsan YOU ; Jae Lyun LEE ; Jun Hyuk HONG ; Hanjong AHN ; Choung Soo KIM
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2013;28(5):687-692
There are concerns whether megestrol acetate (MA) stimulates the growth of prostate cancer in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We evaluated the effect of cumulative doses of MA on the disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with CRPC who were receiving Docetaxel-based chemotherapy. From July 2003 through June 2009, we identified 109 consecutive patients with CRPC and who had received docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Of these patients, 68 (62.4%) have not received MA, whereas 21 patients (19.3%) and 20 patients (18.3%) had received low dose MA (total < or = 18,400 mg) and high dose MA (total > 18,400 mg), respectively. We assessed the effect of several variables on DSS. None of the clinicopathological variables differed among the three groups. When comparing DSS using Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no statistically significant survival differences among the three groups (P = 0.546). Using multivariate Cox proportional analyses with backward elimination, the number of docetaxel cycles was only significant factor predicting DSS (HR: 0.578, 95% CI: 0.318-0.923, P = 0.016). Cumulative doses of MA as adjuvant treatment for patients with CRPC and who are receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy, did not affect their DSS. Therefore, MA can be safely administered in cachexic patients with CRPC.
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Anorexia/complications/*drug therapy
;
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
;
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/*therapeutic use
;
Cachexia/complications/*drug therapy
;
Castration
;
Humans
;
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
;
Male
;
Megestrol Acetate/*therapeutic use
;
Middle Aged
;
Proportional Hazards Models
;
Prostatic Neoplasms/complications/*drug therapy/mortality
;
Taxoids/therapeutic use