1.Yokukansan Descriptions in the Original Texts
Akira KINEBUCHI ; Hiroshi KOSOTO ; Yoko KIMURA ; Yasushi FUJII ; Kazumoto INAKI ; Sachi NAGAO ; Kyoko KONDO ; Mayuko YAMAZAKI ; Hiroyuki TANAKA ; Kaori KATO ; Hiroshi SATO
Kampo Medicine 2014;65(3):180-184
We investigated original texts for yokukansan, a familiar Kampo formula, focusing on the classical literature Xue-shi yi-an (薛氏医案) . Yokukansan was described in the Bao-ying jin-jing-lu (保嬰金鏡録) written by Xue ji (薛己) in 1550, the Xiao-er yao-zheng zhi-jue (小児薬証直訣) revised by Xue ji (薛己) in 1551,the Bao-ying cuo-yao (保嬰撮要) by Xue kai (薛鎧) in 1556, and the Xiao-er dou-zhen fang-lun (小児痘疹方論) in 1550. The phrase “one's own work” was used in “Bao-ying jin-jing-lu (保嬰金鏡録)” and in the Xiao-er dou-zhen fang-lun (小児痘疹方論) by Chen wen-zhong (陳文仲). However, there was no mention of “one's own work” in the same title, the Xiao-er dou-zhen fang-lun (小児痘疹方論), as summarized by Xiong zong-li (熊宗立).
Yokukansan was found only in the Xiao-er yao-zheng zhi-jue (小児薬証直訣) revised by Xue ji (薛己) in 1551, but not in the other copies of the same text. Therefore, it seems likely that yokukansan was created by Xue ji (薛己) himself.
Yokukansan was previously thought to have originated with the Bao-ying cuo-yao (保嬰撮要). However, based on use of the phrase “one's own work” in the classical literature, it appears that the original text for yokukansan should be the Bao-ying jin-jing-lu (保嬰金鏡録). Therefore, yokukansan seems to have been made by Xue ji (薛己), and not Xue kai (薛鎧), who was his father.
2.Impact of the Sensitivity to Empiric Antibiotics on Clinical Outcomes after Biliary Drainage for Acute Cholangitis
Satoshi KAWAMURA ; Yuki KARASAWA ; Nobuo TODA ; Yousuke NAKAI ; Chikako SHIBATA ; Ken KUROKAWA ; Junya ARAI ; Kazuyoshi FUNATO ; Shigeyuki KUROSAKI ; Shuya MAESHIMA ; Mayuko KONDO ; Kentaro KOJIMA ; Takamasa OHKI ; Michiharu SEKI ; Kazuhiko KOIKE ; Kazumi TAGAWA
Gut and Liver 2020;14(6):842-849
Background/Aims:
Empiric antibiotics are given in combina-tion with biliary drainage for acute cholangitis but sometimes turn out to be insensitive to microorganisms in blood and bile. Clinical outcomes were compared according to sensitiv-ity to microorganisms detected in blood and bile culture to evaluate the impact of sensitivity to empiric antibiotics in cholangitis.
Methods:
Consecutive patients who underwent biliary drainage for acute cholangitis were retrospectively studied. Clinical outcomes such as 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay and high care unit stay, organ dysfunction and duration of fever were compared in three groups: group A (sensitive to both blood and bile culture), group B (sensitive to blood culture alone) and group C (insensitive to both blood and bile culture).
Results:
Eighty episodes of cholangitis were classified according to sensitivity results: 42, 32 and six in groups A, B and C. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella were two major pathogens. There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality rate (7%, 0%, and 0%, p=0.244), length of hospital stay (28.5, 21.0, and 20.5 days, p=0.369), organ dysfunction rate (14%, 25%, and 17%, p=0.500), duration of fever (4.3, 3.2, and 3.5 days, p=0.921) and length of high care unit stay (1.4, 1.2, and 1.7 days, p=0.070) in groups A, B and C. Empiric antibiotics were changed in 11 episodes but clinical outcomes appeared to be non-inferior even in 31episodes of cholangitis who were on inadequate antibiotics throughout the course.
Conclusions
Sensitivity of empiric antibiotics was not associated with clinical outcomes in acute cholangitis.