OBJECTIVES: Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is a rare autosomal dominant genetic disorder characterized by pathogenic blood vessel development and maintenance. HHT type 1 (HHT1) and type 2 (HHT2) are caused by variants in endoglin (ENG) and activin receptor-like kinase-1 (ACVRL1), respectively. The aim of this study was to identify the spectrum of pathogenic variants in ENG and ACVRL1 in Austrian HHT families. METHODS: In this prospective study, eight Austrian HHT families were screened for variants in ENG and ACVRL1 by polymerase chain reaction amplification and sequencing of DNA isolated from peripheral blood. RESULTS: Heterozygous variants were identified in all families under study. HHT1 was caused by a novel c.816+1G>A splice donor variant, a novel c.1479C>A nonsense (p.Cys493X) variant and a published c.1306C>T nonsense (p.Gln436X) variant in ENG. Variants found in ACVRL1 were novel c.200G>C (p.Arg67Pro) and known c.772G>A (p.Gly258Ser) missense variants in highly conserved residues, a known heterozygous c.100dupT frameshift (p.Cys34Leufs*4) and the known c.1204G>A missense (p.Gly402Ser) and c.1435C>T nonsense (p.Arg479X) variants as causes of HHT2. CONCLUSION: Novel and published variants in ENG (37.5%) and ACVRL1 (62.5%) were exclusively identified as the cause of HHT in an Austrian patient cohort. Identification of novel causative genetics variants should facilitate the development of tailored therapeutical applications in the future treatment of autosomal dominant HHT.
Activins ; Blood Vessels ; Cohort Studies ; DNA ; Genetics ; Humans ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Prospective Studies ; Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic ; Telangiectasis ; Tissue Donors

INTRODUCTION: Numerous heart failure risk scores have been developed but there is none for Asians. We aimed to develop a risk calculator, the Singapore Heart Failure Risk Score, to predict 1- and 2-year survival in Southeast Asian patients hospitalised for heart failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted for heart failure were identified from the Singapore Cardiac Databank Heart Failure registry. The follow-up was 2 to 4 years and mortality was obtained from national registries. RESULTS: The derivation (2008-2009) and 2 validation cohorts (2008-2009, 2013) included 1392, 729 and 804 patients, respectively. Ten variables were ultimately included in the risk model: age, prior myocardial infarction, prior stroke, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, systolic blood pressure, QRS duration, ejection fraction and creatinine and sodium levels. In the derivation cohort, predicted 1- and 2-year survival was 79.1% and 68.1% compared to actual 1- and 2-year survival of 78.2% and 67.9%. There was good agreement between the predicted and observed mortality rates (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic = 14.36, = 0.073). C-statistics for 2-year mortality in the derivation and validation cohorts were 0.73 (95% CI, 0.70-0.75) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.64-0.72), respectively. CONCLUSION We provided a risk score based on readily available clinical characteristics to predict 1- and 2-year survival in Southeast Asian patients hospitalised for heart failure via a simple online risk calculator, the Singapore Heart Failure Risk Score.