【Objective】 To explore the effectiveness and safety of polyglycolic acid (PGA) and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) composite materials in distal pancreatectomy postoperative suturing. 【Methods】 We selected 36 healthy adult beagles and divided them randomly into observation group and control group, with 18 distal pancreatectomy surgeries in each group. The observation group used PGA+HPMC composite materials for incision reinforcement while the control group used NEOVEIL for incision reinforcement. 3 days before surgery, 3 days after surgery, and before dissection, blood routine tests were performed on each group of experimental dogs. Observation periods of 2-week, 4-week and 8-week were set, and six animals at each observation point were evaluated for histological examination of heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney tissues, hard tissue slice pathological diagnosis, and safety evaluation. 【Results】 There was no significant difference between the observation group and the control group in the preoperative blood routine test. Repeated measures ANOVA results showed differences in the mean values of white blood cell count (WBC) ( F=14.875, P=0.001), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) (F=5.049,P=0.009), neutrophil percentage (Neu%) (F=4.794, P=0.011), red blood cell count (RBC) (F=6.591, P=0.002), hemoglobin (HGB) (F=8.154, P=0.001), hematocrit (HCT) (F=5.281, P=0.007), platelet count (PLT) (F=6.560, P=0.014), red blood cell distribution width coefficient of variation (RDW-CV) (F=33.950, P=0.039), or lymphocyte percentage (Lym%) (F=3.299, P=0.043) at different time points. However, the observation group and the control group did not differ, and the interaction between time and group had no significant effect on the above indicators, suggesting that both groups of dogs had inflammatory response or surgical stress. For the 8-week postoperative hard tissue pathological section score, there was no significant difference between the observation group and the control group in the inflammation and necrosis related score, fibrosis, repair or other related scores and total score (P>0.05). In the dissection at 8 weeks after surgery, no obvious damage to the heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, or other organs was found in both groups, nor was there any residual suture material, pancreatic fistula, or pancreatitis, indicating that the suture materials in both groups had been completely absorbed and metabolized, and the incision healed well without causing adverse effects on the visceral organs. 【Conclusion】 PGA and HPMC are effective and safe postoperative suture materials, with good biodegradability, biocompatibility, suture strength, and wound healing quality. They can be comparable to traditional absorbable reinforcement materials in distal pancreatectomy postoperative suturing, thus providing scientific basis for their clinical application.