This study aimed to document current cervical cancer screening practices of physicians in Korea. Questionnaires were distributed to 852 Korean obstetricians and gynecologists, who attended the 91st Conference of the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology held during May, 2005. Questionnaires were returned by 30.6% (260/852) of the recipients and 254 of these were eligible for analysis. Sixty-seven percent started cervical cancer screening women at age 20, and 65% replied that they would continue annual screening in a 35-yr-old woman with three consecutive normal cytologic tests. Over 65% of respondents preferred conventional cytologic screening to liquid-based cytology. The cost was a major determinant for selecting screening method. Fifty-three percent used the human papillomavirus DNA test as a triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Our findings suggest that majority of Korean obstetricians and gynecologists in hospital prefer annual conventional cytologic testing to liquid-based cytology for financial reason.
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/*economics/epidemiology/*pathology ; Questionnaires ; Physician's Practice Patterns/*statistics & numerical data ; Mass Screening/*economics/*statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Korea/epidemiology ; Humans ; Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Cytological Techniques/*statistics & numerical data ; *Attitude of Health Personnel ; Adult

This study involved a cost-utility analysis of early diagnosis and treatment of diabetic retinopathy depending on the screening strategy used. The four screening strategies evaluated were no screening, opportunistic examination, systematic fundus photography, and systematic examination by an ophthalmologists. Each strategy was evaluated in 10,000 adults aged 40 yr with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (hypothetical cohort). The cost of each strategy was estimated in the perspective of both payer and health care system. The utility was estimated using quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) for the different screening strategies was analyzed. After exclusion of the weakly dominating opportunistic strategy, the ICER of systematic photography was 57,716,867 and that of systematic examination by ophthalmologists was 419,989,046 from the perspective of the healthcare system. According to the results, the systematic strategy is preferable to the opportunistic strategy from the perspective of both a payer and a healthcare system. Although systematic examination by ophthalmologists may have higher utility than systematic photography, it is associated with higher cost. The systematic photography is the best strategy in terms of cost-utility. However systematic examination by ophthalmologists can also be a suitable policy alternative, if the incremental cost is socially acceptable.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; *Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Diabetic Retinopathy/*diagnosis/economics/*therapy ; Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological/economics ; Early Diagnosis ; Female ; Fluorescein Angiography/economics ; Health Care Costs ; Humans ; Male ; Markov Chains ; Mass Screening/*economics/methods/statistics & numerical data ; Middle Aged ; Models, Economic ; National Health Programs/economics ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Republic of Korea