2.A Case of Total Gastrectomy with Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery (HALS) for the Patient with Early Gastric Cancer.
Isao KAWAMURA ; Kazuma YAMAZAKI ; Masaaki KODAMA ; Okamichi MORIKAWA ; Kentaro KANEKO ; Koji TOBITA ; Daisuke HORIBE ; Masakazu HASEGAWA ; Yasushi AKAIKE
Journal of the Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2001;50(1):54-60
The patient was a 63-years-old female with early gastric cancer in her upper stomach. Widely spreading on the mucous membrane, the cancer was too big to remove by endoscopical mucosal resection, although she wanted minimal invasive treatment. Therefore, we adopted total gastrectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) after obtaining “informed consent” from her. Five small skin-incisions were necessary to perform it-one 7cm' for hand-port and four 1.2cm' for trocars.
The dissection was started from greater omentum and proceeded counterclockwise to remove primary lymphnodes. The abdominal esophagus and the duodenum were devided with a single or double application of Endo GIA stapler (linear stapler). All these steps were accomplished safely and securely with the effective support of the left hand of the operator. After extraction of the whole stomach through the 7cm-incision, Roux-en Y reconstruction was performed laparoscopically (esophago-jejunostomy) followed by hand sewing through the 7cm-incision (jejuno-jejunostomy). The anvil of 21mm circular stapler (EEA) was inserted orally in order to anastomose the esophagus to the jejunum. The patient had acceptable results intra-operatively as well as postoperatively by HALS total gastrectomy, which had been considered to be very hard to perform up to present time.
3.Oncological results, functional outcomes and health-related quality-of-life in men who received a radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a study on long-term patient outcome with risk stratification.
Itsuhiro TAKIZAWA ; Noboru HARA ; Tsutomu NISHIYAMA ; Masaaki KANEKO ; Tatsuhiko HOSHII ; Emiko TSUCHIDA ; Kota TAKAHASHI
Asian Journal of Andrology 2009;11(3):283-290
Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) after a radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has not been studied in conjunction with oncological outcomes in relation to disease risk stratification. Moreover, the long-term outcomes of these treatment approaches have not been studied. We retrospectively analyzed oncological outcomes between consecutive patients receiving RP (n=86) and EBRT (n=76) for localized prostate cancer. HRQOL and functional outcomes could be assessed in 62 RP (79%) and 54 EBRT (79%) patients over a 3-year follow-up period (median: 41 months) using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA PCI). The 5-year biochemical progression-free survival did not differ between the RP and EBRT groups for low-risk (74.6% vs. 75.0%, P=0.931) and intermediate-risk (61.3% vs. 71.1%, P=0.691) patients. For high-risk patients, progression-free survival was lower in the RP group (45.1%) than in the EBRT group (79.7%) (P=0.002). The general HRQOL was comparable between the two groups. Regarding functional outcomes, the RP group reported lower scores on urinary function and less urinary bother and sexual bother than the EBRT group (P<0.001, P<0.05 and P<0.001, respectively). With risk stratification, the low- and intermediate-risk patients in the RP group reported poorer urinary function than patients in the EBRT group (P<0.001 for each). The sexual function of the high-risk patients in the EBRT group was better than that of the same risk RP patients (P<0.001). Biochemical recurrence was not associated with the UCLA PCI score in either group. In conclusion, low- to intermediate-risk patients treated with an RP may report relatively decreased urinary function during long-term follow-up. The patient's HRQOL after treatment did not depend on biochemical recurrence.
Aged
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Health Status
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Prostatectomy
;
methods
;
Prostatic Neoplasms
;
epidemiology
;
radiotherapy
;
surgery
;
Quality of Life
;
Radiotherapy
;
methods
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors
;
Treatment Outcome