1.Antiplatelet Use Prior to Anticoagulant Initiation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation-Related Ischemic Stroke: An ELAN Trial Analysis
Alexandros A. POLYMERIS ; Masatoshi KOGA ; Daniel STRBIAN ; Adhiyaman VEDAMURTHY ; Manju KRISHNAN ; Mattia BRANCA ; Thomas HORVATH ; Martina GOELDLIN ; Gek SHIM ; Christoph GUMBINGER ; Liqun ZHANG ; Espen Saxhaug KRISTOFFERSEN ; Philippe DESFONTAINES ; Peter VANACKER ; Angelika ALONSO ; Sven POLI ; Ana Paiva NUNES ; Nicoletta G. CARACCIOLO ; Markus KNEIHSL ; Timo KAHLES ; Daria GIUDICI ; Silja RÄTY ; Marjaana TIAINEN ; Jesse DAWSON ; Urs FISCHER ;
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):217-227
Background:
and Purpose Antiplatelets are often used before direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) initiation after an acute ischemic stroke related to atrial fibrillation (AF), but the evidence is weak. Here, we explored the risks and benefits of this approach.
Methods:
A post-hoc analysis of ELAN (Early versus Late Initiation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Post-ischemic Stroke Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) trial data (NCT03148457) was conducted to compare the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding (extracranial or intracranial hemorrhage [ICH]), and vascular death within 30 days (as a composite and as individual outcomes) in participants treated with and without antiplatelets before DOAC initiation after an AF-associated ischemic stroke. We used both logistic and cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression in inverse probability of treatment weighted models to account for confounding. We calculated the net benefit of antiplatelet use by subtracting the weighted rate of excess bleeding events attributable to antiplatelets from the rate of excess ischemic events possibly prevented by antiplatelets.
Results:
Among 2,013 participants (median age 77 years, 45.5% female), 1,090 (54.1%) used antiplatelets, and 70 (3.5%) experienced the composite outcome. Antiplatelet use was not associated with the composite outcome (inverse probability of treatment weighted odds ratio [ORweighted] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–1.72; inverse probability of treatment weighted hazard ratio [HRweighted] 1.06, 95% CI 0.65–1.72), but showed a lower risk of ischemic stroke recurrence (ORweighted 0.58 [0.30–1.08], HRweighted 0.57 [0.30–1.10]), and a higher risk of major bleeding (ORweighted 1.76 [0.56–6.63], HRweighted 1.88 [0.56–6.39]). Its net benefit was +0.57 (95% CI -1.25 to +2.34) to +0.30 (-1.82 to +2.27) weighted events/100 person-months for ICH weights 1.5 to 3.1.
Conclusion
Following an AF-associated ischemic stroke, we found a lower risk of recurrence and no signs of net harm with antiplatelet use before DOAC initiation, despite an increased risk of bleeding.
2.Antiplatelet Use Prior to Anticoagulant Initiation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation-Related Ischemic Stroke: An ELAN Trial Analysis
Alexandros A. POLYMERIS ; Masatoshi KOGA ; Daniel STRBIAN ; Adhiyaman VEDAMURTHY ; Manju KRISHNAN ; Mattia BRANCA ; Thomas HORVATH ; Martina GOELDLIN ; Gek SHIM ; Christoph GUMBINGER ; Liqun ZHANG ; Espen Saxhaug KRISTOFFERSEN ; Philippe DESFONTAINES ; Peter VANACKER ; Angelika ALONSO ; Sven POLI ; Ana Paiva NUNES ; Nicoletta G. CARACCIOLO ; Markus KNEIHSL ; Timo KAHLES ; Daria GIUDICI ; Silja RÄTY ; Marjaana TIAINEN ; Jesse DAWSON ; Urs FISCHER ;
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):217-227
Background:
and Purpose Antiplatelets are often used before direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) initiation after an acute ischemic stroke related to atrial fibrillation (AF), but the evidence is weak. Here, we explored the risks and benefits of this approach.
Methods:
A post-hoc analysis of ELAN (Early versus Late Initiation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Post-ischemic Stroke Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) trial data (NCT03148457) was conducted to compare the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding (extracranial or intracranial hemorrhage [ICH]), and vascular death within 30 days (as a composite and as individual outcomes) in participants treated with and without antiplatelets before DOAC initiation after an AF-associated ischemic stroke. We used both logistic and cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression in inverse probability of treatment weighted models to account for confounding. We calculated the net benefit of antiplatelet use by subtracting the weighted rate of excess bleeding events attributable to antiplatelets from the rate of excess ischemic events possibly prevented by antiplatelets.
Results:
Among 2,013 participants (median age 77 years, 45.5% female), 1,090 (54.1%) used antiplatelets, and 70 (3.5%) experienced the composite outcome. Antiplatelet use was not associated with the composite outcome (inverse probability of treatment weighted odds ratio [ORweighted] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–1.72; inverse probability of treatment weighted hazard ratio [HRweighted] 1.06, 95% CI 0.65–1.72), but showed a lower risk of ischemic stroke recurrence (ORweighted 0.58 [0.30–1.08], HRweighted 0.57 [0.30–1.10]), and a higher risk of major bleeding (ORweighted 1.76 [0.56–6.63], HRweighted 1.88 [0.56–6.39]). Its net benefit was +0.57 (95% CI -1.25 to +2.34) to +0.30 (-1.82 to +2.27) weighted events/100 person-months for ICH weights 1.5 to 3.1.
Conclusion
Following an AF-associated ischemic stroke, we found a lower risk of recurrence and no signs of net harm with antiplatelet use before DOAC initiation, despite an increased risk of bleeding.
3.Antiplatelet Use Prior to Anticoagulant Initiation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation-Related Ischemic Stroke: An ELAN Trial Analysis
Alexandros A. POLYMERIS ; Masatoshi KOGA ; Daniel STRBIAN ; Adhiyaman VEDAMURTHY ; Manju KRISHNAN ; Mattia BRANCA ; Thomas HORVATH ; Martina GOELDLIN ; Gek SHIM ; Christoph GUMBINGER ; Liqun ZHANG ; Espen Saxhaug KRISTOFFERSEN ; Philippe DESFONTAINES ; Peter VANACKER ; Angelika ALONSO ; Sven POLI ; Ana Paiva NUNES ; Nicoletta G. CARACCIOLO ; Markus KNEIHSL ; Timo KAHLES ; Daria GIUDICI ; Silja RÄTY ; Marjaana TIAINEN ; Jesse DAWSON ; Urs FISCHER ;
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):217-227
Background:
and Purpose Antiplatelets are often used before direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) initiation after an acute ischemic stroke related to atrial fibrillation (AF), but the evidence is weak. Here, we explored the risks and benefits of this approach.
Methods:
A post-hoc analysis of ELAN (Early versus Late Initiation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Post-ischemic Stroke Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) trial data (NCT03148457) was conducted to compare the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding (extracranial or intracranial hemorrhage [ICH]), and vascular death within 30 days (as a composite and as individual outcomes) in participants treated with and without antiplatelets before DOAC initiation after an AF-associated ischemic stroke. We used both logistic and cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression in inverse probability of treatment weighted models to account for confounding. We calculated the net benefit of antiplatelet use by subtracting the weighted rate of excess bleeding events attributable to antiplatelets from the rate of excess ischemic events possibly prevented by antiplatelets.
Results:
Among 2,013 participants (median age 77 years, 45.5% female), 1,090 (54.1%) used antiplatelets, and 70 (3.5%) experienced the composite outcome. Antiplatelet use was not associated with the composite outcome (inverse probability of treatment weighted odds ratio [ORweighted] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–1.72; inverse probability of treatment weighted hazard ratio [HRweighted] 1.06, 95% CI 0.65–1.72), but showed a lower risk of ischemic stroke recurrence (ORweighted 0.58 [0.30–1.08], HRweighted 0.57 [0.30–1.10]), and a higher risk of major bleeding (ORweighted 1.76 [0.56–6.63], HRweighted 1.88 [0.56–6.39]). Its net benefit was +0.57 (95% CI -1.25 to +2.34) to +0.30 (-1.82 to +2.27) weighted events/100 person-months for ICH weights 1.5 to 3.1.
Conclusion
Following an AF-associated ischemic stroke, we found a lower risk of recurrence and no signs of net harm with antiplatelet use before DOAC initiation, despite an increased risk of bleeding.
4.Impact of Stroke Severity and Vascular Risk Factors on Early Versus Late Anticoagulation in Patients With Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation
Masatoshi KOGA ; Mattia BRANCA ; Daniel STRBIAN ; Takeshi YOSHIMOTO ; Kanta TANAKA ; Sohei YOSHIMURA ; Yusuke YAKUSHIJI ; Shigeru FUJIMOTO ; Adhiyaman VEDAMURTHY ; Manju KRISHNAN ; Marjaana TIAINEN ; Jochen VEHOFF ; Gerli SIBOLT ; Kosuke MATSUZONO ; Caterina KULYK ; Silja RÄTY ; Peter SLADE ; Alexander SALERNO ; Dimitri HEMELSOET ; Thomas HORVATH ; Takenobu KUNIEDA ; Makoto NAKAJIMA ; Hisanao AKIYAMA ; Yasuyuki IGUCHI ; Manabu INOUE ; Masafumi IHARA ; Kazunori TOYODA ; David SEIFFGE ; Martina GOELDLIN ; Jesse DAWSON ; Urs FISCHER
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):284-288
5.Impact of Stroke Severity and Vascular Risk Factors on Early Versus Late Anticoagulation in Patients With Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation
Masatoshi KOGA ; Mattia BRANCA ; Daniel STRBIAN ; Takeshi YOSHIMOTO ; Kanta TANAKA ; Sohei YOSHIMURA ; Yusuke YAKUSHIJI ; Shigeru FUJIMOTO ; Adhiyaman VEDAMURTHY ; Manju KRISHNAN ; Marjaana TIAINEN ; Jochen VEHOFF ; Gerli SIBOLT ; Kosuke MATSUZONO ; Caterina KULYK ; Silja RÄTY ; Peter SLADE ; Alexander SALERNO ; Dimitri HEMELSOET ; Thomas HORVATH ; Takenobu KUNIEDA ; Makoto NAKAJIMA ; Hisanao AKIYAMA ; Yasuyuki IGUCHI ; Manabu INOUE ; Masafumi IHARA ; Kazunori TOYODA ; David SEIFFGE ; Martina GOELDLIN ; Jesse DAWSON ; Urs FISCHER
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):284-288
6.Impact of Stroke Severity and Vascular Risk Factors on Early Versus Late Anticoagulation in Patients With Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation
Masatoshi KOGA ; Mattia BRANCA ; Daniel STRBIAN ; Takeshi YOSHIMOTO ; Kanta TANAKA ; Sohei YOSHIMURA ; Yusuke YAKUSHIJI ; Shigeru FUJIMOTO ; Adhiyaman VEDAMURTHY ; Manju KRISHNAN ; Marjaana TIAINEN ; Jochen VEHOFF ; Gerli SIBOLT ; Kosuke MATSUZONO ; Caterina KULYK ; Silja RÄTY ; Peter SLADE ; Alexander SALERNO ; Dimitri HEMELSOET ; Thomas HORVATH ; Takenobu KUNIEDA ; Makoto NAKAJIMA ; Hisanao AKIYAMA ; Yasuyuki IGUCHI ; Manabu INOUE ; Masafumi IHARA ; Kazunori TOYODA ; David SEIFFGE ; Martina GOELDLIN ; Jesse DAWSON ; Urs FISCHER
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):284-288
7.Etiology, 3-Month Functional Outcome and Recurrent Events in Non-Traumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Martina B. GOELDLIN ; Achim MUELLER ; Bernhard M. SIEPEN ; Madlaine MUELLER ; Davide STRAMBO ; Patrik MICHEL ; Michael SCHAERER ; Carlo W. CEREDA ; Giovanni BIANCO ; Florian LINDHEIMER ; Christian BERGER ; Friedrich MEDLIN ; Roland BACKHAUS ; Nils PETERS ; Susanne RENAUD ; Loraine FISCH ; Julien NIEDERHAEUSER ; Emmanuel CARRERA ; Elisabeth DIRREN ; Christophe BONVIN ; Rolf STURZENEGGER ; Timo KAHLES ; Krassen NEDELTCHEV ; Georg KAEGI ; Jochen VEHOFF ; Biljana RODIC ; Manuel BOLOGNESE ; Ludwig SCHELOSKY ; Stephan SALMEN ; Marie-Luise MONO ; Alexandros A. POLYMERIS ; Stefan T. ENGELTER ; Philippe LYRER ; Susanne WEGENER ; Andreas R. LUFT ; Werner Z’GRAGGEN ; David BERVINI ; Bastian VOLBERS ; Tomas DOBROCKY ; Johannes KAESMACHER ; Pasquale MORDASINI ; Thomas R. MEINEL ; Marcel ARNOLD ; Javier FANDINO ; Leo H. BONATI ; Urs FISCHER ; David J. SEIFFGE ;
Journal of Stroke 2022;24(2):266-277
Background:
and Purpose Knowledge about different etiologies of non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and their outcomes is scarce.
Methods:
We assessed prevalence of pre-specified ICH etiologies and their association with outcomes in consecutive ICH patients enrolled in the prospective Swiss Stroke Registry (2014 to 2019). Results We included 2,650 patients (mean±standard deviation age 72±14 years, 46.5% female, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 8 [interquartile range, 3 to 15]). Etiology was as follows: hypertension, 1,238 (46.7%); unknown, 566 (21.4%); antithrombotic therapy, 227 (8.6%); cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), 217 (8.2%); macrovascular cause, 128 (4.8%); other determined etiology, 274 patients (10.3%). At 3 months, 880 patients (33.2%) were functionally independent and 664 had died (25.1%). ICH due to hypertension had a higher odds of functional independence (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 1.77; P=0.05) and lower mortality (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.86; P=0.003). ICH due to antithrombotic therapy had higher mortality (aOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.61; P=0.045). Within 3 months, 4.2% of patients had cerebrovascular events. The rate of ischemic stroke was higher than that of recurrent ICH in all etiologies but CAA and unknown etiology. CAA had high odds of recurrent ICH (aOR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.48 to 7.69; P=0.004) while the odds was lower in ICH due to hypertension (aOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.93; P=0.031).
Conclusions
Although hypertension is the leading etiology of ICH, other etiologies are frequent. One-third of ICH patients are functionally independent at 3 months. Except for patients with presumed CAA, the risk of ischemic stroke within 3 months of ICH was higher than the risk of recurrent hemorrhage.