Recent position statements and guidelines have raised the distinction between a true and false, age-related hypogonadism (HG) or late-onset hypogonadism (LOH). The former is the consequence of congenital or acquired “organic” damage of the brain centers or of the testis. The latter is mainly secondary to age-related comorbidities and does not require testosterone (T) therapy (TTh). In addition, concerns related to cardiovascular (CV) safety have further increased the scepticism related to TTh. In this paper, we reviewed the available evidence supporting the efficacy of TTh in non-organic HG and its long term safety. A large amount of evidence has documented that sexual symptoms are the most specific correlates of T deficiency. TTh is able to improve all aspects of sexual function independent of the pathogenetic origin of the disease supporting the scientific demonstration that LOH does exist according to an “ex-juvantibus” criterion. Although the presence of metabolic derangements could mitigate the efficacy of TTh on erectile dysfunction, the positive effect of TTh on body composition and insulin sensitivity might counterbalance the lower efficacy. CV safety concerns related to TTh are essentially based on a limited number of observational and randomized controlled trials which present important methodological flaws. When HG is properly diagnosed and TTh correctly performed no CV and prostate risk have been documented.
Body Composition ; Brain ; Comorbidity ; Erectile Dysfunction ; Hypogonadism ; Insulin Resistance ; Male ; Prostate ; Testis ; Testosterone*

Late-onset hypogonadism (LOH) is a syndromic condition that has a well-recognized association with sexual and reproductive failure. LOH is frequently associated with chronic conditions including cardiovascular diseases (CVD), obesity, osteoporosis, HIV infection, renal failure, and obstructive pulmonary diseases. Despite this evidence, in patients with these conditions, LOH is still only rarely investigated and testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) rarely considered. In this paper, we critically reviewed the available evidence on LOH treatment focusing on possible risks and benefits. Medical therapy of LOH should be individualized depending on the etiology of the disease and the patient's expectations. The fear of prostate cancer and the risk of erythrocytosis probably represent the main limitations of TRT in aging men. However, TRT in healthy older men in near physiological doses does not appear to incur serious adverse events, although regular monitoring of prostate-specific antigen and hematocrit levels is required. Available evidence also suggests that TRT might ameliorate central obesity and glycometabolic control in patients with metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. In addition, TRT has been associated with an increase in bone mineral density in men with osteoporosis, with an improvement in lean body mass in subjects with human immunodeficiency virus infection or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, as well as with peripheral oxygenation in patients with chronic kidney diseases. Despite this evidence, however, it should be recognized that the results of these trials were heterogeneous and limited by small sample sizes. Hence, further research is required regarding the long-term benefits and adverse effects of TRT in LOH.
Aging ; Bone Density ; Cardiovascular Diseases ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Erectile Dysfunction ; Hematocrit ; HIV ; HIV Infections ; Humans ; Hypogonadism ; Lung Diseases, Obstructive ; Male ; Obesity ; Obesity, Abdominal ; Osteoporosis ; Polycythemia ; Prostate ; Prostate-Specific Antigen ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive ; Renal Insufficiency ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic ; Testosterone

Recent reports in the scientific and lay press have suggested that testosterone (T) replacement therapy (TRT) is likely to increase cardiovascular (CV) risk. In a final report released in 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cautioned that prescribing T products is approved only for men who have low T levels due to primary or secondary hypogonadism resulting from problems within the testis, pituitary, or hypothalamus (e.g., genetic problems or damage from surgery, chemotherapy, or infection). In this report, the FDA emphasized that the benefits and safety of T medications have not been established for the treatment of low T levels due to aging, even if a man's symptoms seem to be related to low T. In this paper, we reviewed the available evidence on the association between TRT and CV risk. In particular, data from randomized controlled studies and information derived from observational and pharmacoepidemiological investigations were scrutinized. The data meta-analyzed here do not support any causal role between TRT and adverse CV events. This is especially true when hypogonadism is properly diagnosed and replacement therapy is correctly performed. Elevated hematocrit represents the most common adverse event related to TRT. Hence, it is important to monitor hematocrit at regular intervals in T-treated subjects in order to avoid potentially serious adverse events.
Aging ; Drug Therapy ; Hematocrit ; Humans ; Hypogonadism ; Hypothalamus ; Male ; Mortality ; Myocardial Infarction ; Testis ; Testosterone* ; United States Food and Drug Administration

In published article by Corona G et al., an author's name was misspelled.

Purpose: Weight loss has been shown to significantly elevate testosterone serum levels, though the impact on semen analysis parameters and fertility remains incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to examine the influence of body weight loss on semen parameters in obese men. Materials and Methods: A meta-analysis was performed that included clinical trials in which a semen analysis before and after weight loss was evaluated. All strategies potentially available for weight loss were considered eligible. The primary outcome was the comparison of conventional semen analysis parameters before and after weight loss. Results: Twelve studies were considered including 345 subjects (mean age 37.6±7.9 years; mean baseline body mass index 45.4±6.0 kg/m2). Weight loss resulted in a significant increase of sperm concentration (effect size 0.495, standard error 0.251 [0.003, 0.986], p=0.049) and progressive motility (effect size 0.567, standard error 0.372 [0.370, 0.764], p<0.001). Moreover, a significant decrease of sperm DNA fragmentation index after weight loss (effect size −0.689, standard error 0.278 [−1.123, −0.255], p=0.002) was observed. Conclusions This meta-analytic analysis confirmed that body weight loss may improve qualitative and quantitative sperm characteristics providing evidence for suggesting weight loss to male partners with obesity and semen analysis alteration in couples attempting conception.

Purpose: Weight loss has been shown to significantly elevate testosterone serum levels, though the impact on semen analysis parameters and fertility remains incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to examine the influence of body weight loss on semen parameters in obese men. Materials and Methods: A meta-analysis was performed that included clinical trials in which a semen analysis before and after weight loss was evaluated. All strategies potentially available for weight loss were considered eligible. The primary outcome was the comparison of conventional semen analysis parameters before and after weight loss. Results: Twelve studies were considered including 345 subjects (mean age 37.6±7.9 years; mean baseline body mass index 45.4±6.0 kg/m2). Weight loss resulted in a significant increase of sperm concentration (effect size 0.495, standard error 0.251 [0.003, 0.986], p=0.049) and progressive motility (effect size 0.567, standard error 0.372 [0.370, 0.764], p<0.001). Moreover, a significant decrease of sperm DNA fragmentation index after weight loss (effect size −0.689, standard error 0.278 [−1.123, −0.255], p=0.002) was observed. Conclusions This meta-analytic analysis confirmed that body weight loss may improve qualitative and quantitative sperm characteristics providing evidence for suggesting weight loss to male partners with obesity and semen analysis alteration in couples attempting conception.

Purpose: Weight loss has been shown to significantly elevate testosterone serum levels, though the impact on semen analysis parameters and fertility remains incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to examine the influence of body weight loss on semen parameters in obese men. Materials and Methods: A meta-analysis was performed that included clinical trials in which a semen analysis before and after weight loss was evaluated. All strategies potentially available for weight loss were considered eligible. The primary outcome was the comparison of conventional semen analysis parameters before and after weight loss. Results: Twelve studies were considered including 345 subjects (mean age 37.6±7.9 years; mean baseline body mass index 45.4±6.0 kg/m2). Weight loss resulted in a significant increase of sperm concentration (effect size 0.495, standard error 0.251 [0.003, 0.986], p=0.049) and progressive motility (effect size 0.567, standard error 0.372 [0.370, 0.764], p<0.001). Moreover, a significant decrease of sperm DNA fragmentation index after weight loss (effect size −0.689, standard error 0.278 [−1.123, −0.255], p=0.002) was observed. Conclusions This meta-analytic analysis confirmed that body weight loss may improve qualitative and quantitative sperm characteristics providing evidence for suggesting weight loss to male partners with obesity and semen analysis alteration in couples attempting conception.

Purpose: Weight loss has been shown to significantly elevate testosterone serum levels, though the impact on semen analysis parameters and fertility remains incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to examine the influence of body weight loss on semen parameters in obese men. Materials and Methods: A meta-analysis was performed that included clinical trials in which a semen analysis before and after weight loss was evaluated. All strategies potentially available for weight loss were considered eligible. The primary outcome was the comparison of conventional semen analysis parameters before and after weight loss. Results: Twelve studies were considered including 345 subjects (mean age 37.6±7.9 years; mean baseline body mass index 45.4±6.0 kg/m2). Weight loss resulted in a significant increase of sperm concentration (effect size 0.495, standard error 0.251 [0.003, 0.986], p=0.049) and progressive motility (effect size 0.567, standard error 0.372 [0.370, 0.764], p<0.001). Moreover, a significant decrease of sperm DNA fragmentation index after weight loss (effect size −0.689, standard error 0.278 [−1.123, −0.255], p=0.002) was observed. Conclusions This meta-analytic analysis confirmed that body weight loss may improve qualitative and quantitative sperm characteristics providing evidence for suggesting weight loss to male partners with obesity and semen analysis alteration in couples attempting conception.

Purpose: Weight loss has been shown to significantly elevate testosterone serum levels, though the impact on semen analysis parameters and fertility remains incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to examine the influence of body weight loss on semen parameters in obese men. Materials and Methods: A meta-analysis was performed that included clinical trials in which a semen analysis before and after weight loss was evaluated. All strategies potentially available for weight loss were considered eligible. The primary outcome was the comparison of conventional semen analysis parameters before and after weight loss. Results: Twelve studies were considered including 345 subjects (mean age 37.6±7.9 years; mean baseline body mass index 45.4±6.0 kg/m2). Weight loss resulted in a significant increase of sperm concentration (effect size 0.495, standard error 0.251 [0.003, 0.986], p=0.049) and progressive motility (effect size 0.567, standard error 0.372 [0.370, 0.764], p<0.001). Moreover, a significant decrease of sperm DNA fragmentation index after weight loss (effect size −0.689, standard error 0.278 [−1.123, −0.255], p=0.002) was observed. Conclusions This meta-analytic analysis confirmed that body weight loss may improve qualitative and quantitative sperm characteristics providing evidence for suggesting weight loss to male partners with obesity and semen analysis alteration in couples attempting conception.