1.Expectations of Lumbar Surgery Outcomes among Opioid Users Compared with Non-Users
Marie-Jacqueline REISENER ; Alexander P. HUGHES ; Paul SCHADLER ; Alexa FORMAN ; Oliver C. SAX ; Jennifer SHUE ; Frank P. CAMMISA ; Andrew A. SAMA ; Federico P. GIRARDI ; Carol A. MANCUSO
Asian Spine Journal 2020;14(5):663-672
Methods:
A total of 77 opioid users grouped according to dose and duration (54 “higher users,” 30 “lower users”) were matched 2:1 to 154 non-opioid users based on age, sex, marital status, chiropractic care, disability, and diagnosis. All patients completed a validated 20-item Expectations Survey measuring expected improvement with regard to symptoms, function, psychological well-being, and anticipated future spine condition. “Greater expectations” was defined as a higher survey score (possible range, 0–100) based on the number of items expected and degree of improvement expected.
Results:
The mean Expectations Survey scores for all opioid users and all non-users were similar (73 vs. 70, p=0.18). Scores were different, however, for lower users (79) compared with matched non-users (69, p=0.01) and compared with higher users (70, p=0.01). In multivariable analysis, “reater expectations” was independently associated with having had chiropractic care (p=0.03), being more disabled (p=0.002), and being a lower-dose opioid user (p=0.03). Compared with higher users, lower users were also more likely to expect not to need pain medications 2 years after surgery (47% vs. 83%, p=0.003).
Conclusions
Patient expectations of lumbar surgery are associated with diverse demographic and clinical variables. A lower dose and shorter duration of opioid use were associated with expecting more items and expecting more complete improvement compared with non-users. In addition, lower opioid users had greater overall expectations compared with higher users.
2.Determinants of Postoperative Spinal Height Change among Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Long Construct Circumferential Fusion
Colleen RENTENBERGER ; Ichiro OKANO ; Stephan N. SALZMANN ; Toshiyuki SHIRAHATA ; Marie-Jacqueline REISENER ; Jennifer SHUE ; Andrew A. SAMA ; Frank P. CAMMISA ; Federico P. GIRARDI ; Alexander P. HUGHES
Asian Spine Journal 2021;15(2):155-163
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and imaging data of ASD patients who underwent lumbar corrective circumferential fusion of ≥3 levels (n=106). SH was defined as the vertical distance between C2 and S1 on a standing lateral image. As potential predictors of postoperative height change, the number of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) levels, change in spino-pelvic parameters, total number of levels fused, and pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) were documented. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors of postoperative height change.
Results:
The mean SH change was −2.39±50.8 mm (range, −160 to 172 mm). The univariate analyses showed that the number of LLIF levels (coefficient=10.9,
3.Determinants of Postoperative Spinal Height Change among Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Long Construct Circumferential Fusion
Colleen RENTENBERGER ; Ichiro OKANO ; Stephan N. SALZMANN ; Toshiyuki SHIRAHATA ; Marie-Jacqueline REISENER ; Jennifer SHUE ; Andrew A. SAMA ; Frank P. CAMMISA ; Federico P. GIRARDI ; Alexander P. HUGHES
Asian Spine Journal 2021;15(2):155-163
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and imaging data of ASD patients who underwent lumbar corrective circumferential fusion of ≥3 levels (n=106). SH was defined as the vertical distance between C2 and S1 on a standing lateral image. As potential predictors of postoperative height change, the number of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) levels, change in spino-pelvic parameters, total number of levels fused, and pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) were documented. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors of postoperative height change.
Results:
The mean SH change was −2.39±50.8 mm (range, −160 to 172 mm). The univariate analyses showed that the number of LLIF levels (coefficient=10.9,