Flagellate erythema or flagellate dermatitis is characterized by pruritic linear streaks of erythematous or brown patches and plaques, presenting with a whip-like appearance. The lesions are associated with various etiologies like consumption of shiitake mushrooms, rheumatologic disorders, and drugs, among others. Its association with bleomycin as an adverse reaction was first reported in 1970. It is a rare phenomenon with a reported incidence of only 8 to 20%.

This is a case of a 29-year-old male with mediastinal seminoma who was started on bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) regimen. He developed pruritic erythematous papules and linear streaks of erythematous and brown patches and plaques, most prominent on the trunk and extremities ten days after starting the chemotherapy regimen cycle. The initial presentation was subtle, with worsening after continued administration of bleomycin. A skin punch biopsy showed spongiotic interface dermatitis with eosinophils, and the patient was managed symptomatically.

Flagellate erythema is a rare form of cutaneous reaction to bleomycin. It may have a subtle presentation initially but it must be suspected in patients on bleomycin presenting with sudden onset linear or whip-like erythematous or brown lesions.

Human ; Male ; Adult: 25-44 Yrs Old ; Bleomycin

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) leads to immunosuppression by depleting CD4+ T-cells. Psoriasis, a common immune-mediated inflammatory dermatosis, can paradoxically worsen or emerge as an initial presentation of HIV. The introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in psoriatic patients with HIV may trigger severe psoriasis flare-ups, often linked to immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS).

This case involves a 31-year-old Filipino male with recurrent, resistant psoriatic plaques. Further testing revealed latent syphilis and HIV infection. The patient completed treatment for syphilis and began HAART, but developed erythrodermic psoriasis, likely due to IRIS. After an inadequate response to acitretin, guselkumab, an IL-23 inhibitor, was administered. The patient responded well, showing significant improvement after four months of treatment without adverse effects.

This case suggests that in severely immunocompromised patients with newly diagnosed HIV, adding guselkumab to conventional HAART may be a safe and effective option for controlling erythrodermic psoriasis flares triggered by immune reconstitution. However, further research is needed to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of guselkumab in HIV-associated psoriasis.

Human ; Male ; Adult: 25-44 Yrs Old ; Guselkumab ; Hiv ; Psoriasis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Oral ivermectin, a broad-spectrum anti-parasitic drug, alone or in combination with permethrin, may be a cheaper and more convenient alternative drug to topical permethrin alone in the treatment of classic scabies. There are no previous studies on the treatment acceptability of the three interventions among individual patients with scabies in the Philippines. The purpose of this study was to understand the experiences and perceptions on treatment acceptability for oral ivermectin, topical permethrin or combination treatment among patients with scabies using the multiple-case study approach.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative multiple case study among adult Filipino patients with classic scabies who were prescribed oral ivermectin, topical permethrin or its combination at a government tertiary hospital dermatology outpatient clinic from December 2022 to September 2023. Semi-structured interviews were used as the primary source of data and analyzed together with chart reviews, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores, and clinical images. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and triangulated with other secondary data. A three-person research team employed a reflexive and iterative process of familiarization, coding, and thematic analysis using a modified Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) to generate case descriptions, within-case analyses, and cross-case syntheses.

RESULTS

The acceptability of scabies treatments (permethrin, ivermectin, and combination therapy) was generally positive. Permethrin, used in three patient cases, was generally perceived as effective but itch relief varied. The burden of whole-body application of permethrin was context-dependent, influenced by living arrangements and family support. Perceived affordability of permethrin was linked to socioeconomic status. Ivermectin, used by one patient case, was perceived as highly effective with no side effects. Its single dose use did not interfere with patient routine. Combination therapy was also considered effective but potential antagonistic effects and the cost of adding permethrin made it less preferred. Reluctance in taking oral pills was noted. All patients valued medical advice and deferred to their physicians for treatment decisions.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

All three treatment options were considered effective and safe. Patients generally preferred permethrin over oral ivermectin due to its topical nature and perceived lower side effects. However, affordability and logistical challenges, especially for large households and low-income families, were noted with permethrin. Oral ivermectin elicited hesitation due to its controversial role in COVID-19 and veterinary use. Concerns about added costs and potential antagonism in combination therapy were raised. Despite these considerations, patients ultimately relied on physicians for treatment decisions. This study underscores the importance of understanding patient perspectives, experiences, and the patient-physician relationship in choosing scabies interventions. Addressing patient concerns, providing education, and ensuring ease of use and affordability can enhance treatment acceptability and adherence for better outcomes.

Human ; Scabies ; Ivermectin ; Permethrin ; Case Study ; Case Reports ; Qualitative Research