OBJECTIVE: To compare the presence and severity of meibomian gland (MG) dysfunction among eyes of female subjects with and without eyelid margin tattoos using infrared meibography and colored photographs. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study that involved 38 Filipino females with and without eyelid margin tattoos. Infrared meibography was performed on the upper and lower eyelids of each eye to assess total or partial MG dropout. Colored photographs were taken to evaluate vascularity, irregularity, thickening of the lid margins, and plugging of MG orifices. Severity of MG dysfunction (MGD) was assessed using Arita’s MGD proposed grading scale. Independent t-test was used to compare MG dropout and other lid margin parameters between the two groups. Prevalence ratio and prevalence odds ratio were calculated to measure the likelihood of MGD among eyes with eyelid tattoos. RESULTS: Seventy-four (74) eyes were included in the study (36 in the tattoo group and 38 in the control group). Scores for abnormal vascularity, irregularity, and thickening of the lid margins were significantly higher in the tattoo group compared to the control group (p<0.0000001). However, plugging of gland orifices scores between the two groups were found to be similar (upper eyelid: p=0.65; lower eyelid: p=0.91). Total MG dropout was significantly greater in the tattoo group (upper eyelid: -1.11 ± 0.82; lower eyelid: 1.37 ± 0.75) compared to the control group (upper eyelid: 0.53 ± 0.83; lower eyelid: 0.45 ± 0.76) (upper eyelid: p=0.003; lower eyelid: p=0.000001) for the upper and lower eyelid, respectively). Analysis of total MG dropout between the two groups showed a prevalence ratio of 2.13. CONCLUSION: Eyelid margin tattoos are associated with several eyelid margin abnormalities and increase the risk of meibomian gland droupout.
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction ; Tattooing ; Margins of Excision

The concept of radical surgery has experienced from vascular anatomy guidance, lymph node dissection guidance to en-bloc resection guidance. At present, the mesentery guided surgery has developed to a new level of understanding. There are many classical theories on the understanding of the mesentery, from "the mesentery is a wrapped composite structure" to "the mesentery is an organ" and then to "the generalized mesentery theory", but they do not clearly put forward the boundary mark of the mesentery. On the basis of various membrane anatomy theories at home and abroad, we summarized and defined three boundaries of mesenteric excision in radical resection of colorectal cancer. The lateral boundary of the mesentery is the intestinal resection boundary and its mesentery oriented by supplyvessel, the bottom boundary is the mesentery bed, and the central boundary is the degree of lymph node radical resection. Through the detailed description of the mesentery excision, it is helpful to accurately define the mesenteric margin in different stages of radical resection of tumors.
Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Mesentery/anatomy & histology* ; Gastrectomy ; Margins of Excision ; Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology*

The judgment of surgical resection margins is an important factor affecting local recurrence and distant metastasis of colorectal cancer, which is crucial to the prognosis of patients. How to select a standard and ideal surgical resection margin is a challenge for colorectal cancer surgeons. Surgical resection margins for colorectal cancer include longitudinal resection margin (LRM) and circumferential resection margin (CRM), and the distance of safe resection margins varies according to different guidelines. Surgical resection margins are mainly evaluated by preoperative imaging, operative experience, operative type, hyperspectral imaging (HPI) and fluorescence angiography (FA), and postoperative pathology. It is the constant pursuit of colorectal cancer surgeons to pay attention to the safe resection margins in colorectal cancer surgery to reduce local recurrence and distant metastasis.
Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; Humans ; Margins of Excision ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Prognosis ; Rectal Neoplasms

BACKGROUND: Positive surgical margins are independent risk factor for biochemical recurrence, local recurrence, and distant metastasis after radical prostatectomy. However, limited predictive tools are available. This study aimed to develop and validate a preoperative nomogram for predicting positive surgical margins after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). METHODS: From January 2010 to March 2016, a total of 418 patients who underwent LRP without receiving neoadjuvant therapy at Peking University Third Hospital were retrospectively involved in this study. Clinical and pathological results of each patient were collected for further analysis. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression (backward stepwise method) were used for the nomogram development. The concordance index (CI), calibration curve analysis and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the performance of our model. RESULTS: Of 418 patients involved in this study, 142 patients (34.0%) had a positive surgical margin on final pathology. Based on the backward selection, four variables were included in the final multivariable regression model, including the percentage of positive cores in preoperative biopsy, clinical stage, free prostate specific antigen (fPSA)/total PSA (tPSA), and age. A nomogram was developed using these four variables. The concordance index (C-index) of the nomogram was 0.722 in the development cohort and 0.700 in the bootstrap validations. The bias-corrected calibration plot showed a limited departure from the ideal line with a mean absolute error of 2.0%. In decision curve analyses, the nomogram showed net benefits in the range from 0.2 to 0.7. CONCLUSION A nomogram to predict positive surgical margins after LRP was developed and validated, which could help urologists plan surgical procedures.
Aged ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Male ; Margins of Excision ; Middle Aged ; Nomograms ; Prostatectomy ; methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; surgery ; ROC Curve ; Retrospective Studies

Neoadjuvant therapy has been widely applied in the treatment of rectal cancer, which can shrink tumor size, lower tumor staging and improve the prognosis. It has been the standard preoperative treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer patients varies between individuals, and the results of tumor regression are obviously different. Some patients with good tumor regression even achieve pathological complete response (pCR). Tumor regression is of great significance for the selection of surgical regimes and the determination of distal resection margin. However, few studies focus on tumor regression patterns. Controversies on the safe distance of distal resection margin after neoadjuvant treatment still exist. Therefore, based on the current research progress, this review summarized the main tumor regression patterns after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer, and classified them into three types: tumor shrinkage, tumor fragmentation, and mucin pool formation. And macroscopic regression and microscopic regression of tumors were compared to describe the phenomenon of non-synchronous regression. Then, the safety of non-surgical treatment for patients with clinical complete response (cCR) was analyzed to elaborate the necessity of surgical treatment. Finally, the review studied the safe surgical resection range to explore the safe distance of distal resection margin.
Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods* ; Margins of Excision ; Treatment Outcome ; Rectal Neoplasms/pathology* ; Rectum/pathology* ; Neoplasm Staging ; Retrospective Studies

Humans ; Female ; Mastectomy, Segmental ; Margins of Excision ; Reoperation ; Breast Neoplasms/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery* ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local

Adenocarcinoma/surgery* ; Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Esophagogastric Junction/surgery* ; Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Margins of Excision ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms/surgery*

OBJECTIVETo investigate the intramural lateral spread distance in low rectal cancer in order to provide basis for safety lateral resection margin of pull-through conformal resection (PTCR).

METHODSThe patients with low rectal cancer who received low anterior resection or abdominal-perineal resection in Changhai Hospital from December 2015 to March 2016 were enrolled and Surgical specimens were collected. After the specimens were fixed in 10% formaldehyde for 24 hours, a piece of tissue that was 1.5 cm in length and 0.5 cm in width from the edge of tumor was cut. The tissue was obtained in the direction of 3, 5, 7 and 9 o'clock clockwise. The distance of intramural lateral spread was measured in the specimens and the risk factors were analyzed.

RESULTSA total of 83 specimens were collected and the overall proportion of intramural lateral spread was 71.1%(59/83). The rate of lateral spread from 3 to 9 o'clock was 34.9%(29/83), 26.5%(22/83), 32.5%(27/83) and 37.3%(31/83) respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant(χ=2.444 9, P=0.485 3). The median distance of lateral spread in each direction was all 0 mm and the quartile range was 1 mm, 0.5 mm, 0.55 mm and 1 mm respectively. The 5th percentile (P5) of each direction was all 0 mm and the 95th percentile(P95) of each direction was 2.5 mm, 1.6 mm, 2.6 mm, 2.5 mm, respectively and the difference was not statistically significant either(χ=5.331 0, P=0.148 9). The rate of lateral spread of T1, T2, T3 and T4 was 0/4, 58.3%(14/24), 83.0%(44/53) and 1/2 respectively, and there was significant difference(P=0.005 0). The multivariate analysis indicated that T stage (P=0.002 2, OR=3.741, 95% CI: 1.606-8.716) was the risk factor of intramural lateral spread.

CONCLUSIONSThe intramural lateral spread does exist in low rectal cancer and T stage is the risk factor of lateral spread. The lateral resection margin should be 5 mm from the tumor edge at least when PTCR is performed.

Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Humans ; Margins of Excision ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; pathology ; Neoplasm Staging ; adverse effects ; Rectal Neoplasms ; pathology ; surgery ; Rectum ; surgery ; Risk Factors

Recent evidence has shown that a five-centimeter distal margin is not required for cancers of the rectum. These findings proved significant in that selected patients with low rectal lesions can be offered curative operations that can preserve normal sphincter function, an intact route of defecation, and have a better quality of life. From August 2000 to July 2001, we began our series of examining specimens after rectal resection to determine the negative distal margin. The specimens for pathologic examination were cut at 0.5 cm intervals up to 2.0 cm from the raised distal edge of the tumor. The objective of this paper is to determine the distance of intramural tumor spread of rectal cancer from the macroscopic tumor edge. During the one-year period, a total of 11 specimens from rectal cancer patients were examined, ages of the patients ranged from 29 to 77 years. Eighty-two percent of patients had locally advanced (T3 and T4) lesions. Lymph node involvement was seen in 72 percent. Analysis of distal margins showed the following: five of 11 (45 percent) were positive for malignant cells at 0.5 cm from the tumor edge, four of 11 (36 percent) positive at 1.0 cm, one of 11 (nine percent) positive at 1.5 cm, and no malignant cells were seen at 2.0 cm distal margin. Our early results support the adequacy of a 2 cm distal resection margin for rectal cancer surgery. (Author)

Human ; Male ; Female ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Rectum ; Margins Of Excision ; Defecation ; Rectal Neoplasms ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; Patient Selection ; Lymph Nodes

Objective: To investigate the application of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) in the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data about 10 cases of early-stage prostate cancer treated by RS-RARP with the Da Vinci Robot Surgical System from September to October 2016. RESULTS: All the operations were successfully completed without positive surgical margins. The operation time was 170－250 min (［196±25］ min), the intraoperative blood loss was 150－500 ml (［260±128］ ml), the postoperative hospital stay was 6－7 days, and the catheterization time was 14 days. Urinary continence occurred after catheter removal in 1 patient and was recovered 1 month later. CONCLUSIONS RS-RARP is a safe, effective and reliable method for the treatment of prostate cancer and conducive to the early recovery of urinary continence.
Blood Loss, Surgical ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Margins of Excision ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Period ; Prostatectomy ; methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; pathology ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures