Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of behavioral activation for depression scale (C-BADS) in patients in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT).Methods:A total of 162 opioid addicts were recruited from the MMT programs in Wuhan city for the C-BADS investigation.Items analysis and exploratory factors analysis (EFA) were conducted with SPSS 21.0 and confirmatory factors analysis (CFA) was conducted with AMOS 24.0.Results:The correlation coefficients between subscales and total score were 0.228-0.813 (all P<0.01). Except for activation subscale, the correlation coefficients among subscales were lower than those between subscale dimensions and total score.The item-total score correlations coefficient were 0.060-0.716.Four factors were extracted by EFA, named avoidance/rumination(AR), activation(AC), social impairment(SI) and work/school impairment(WS) respectively, which the cumulative variance was 51.153%, and the factor loading of each item ranged from 0.328 to 0.797.The fitting indexes of CFA model were as following: χ 2/ df=1.594, CFI=0.839, TLI=0.820, IFI=0.844, RMSEA=0.069, SRMR=0.089.The Cronbach's α of the scale was 0.790, and the split-half reliability coefficient was 0.827. Conclusion:C-BADS has good internal consistency reliability and construct validity, but it still needs to be modified for the measurement of behavior activation of patients in MMT.

Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Reward Probability Index-Chinese version (C-RPI) among individuals with opioid dependence.Methods:A total of 160 individuals with opioid dependence were recruited from the methadone maintenance treatment(MMT) programs in Wuhan.The C-RPI was used in the investigation, and items/exploratory factors and confirmatory factors were adopted to analyze with IBM SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 24.0, respectively.Results:The correlation between each item and the total score of the scale was 0.325-0.657 (all P<0.01) and the item discrimination of the scale was good.Exploratory factor analysis extracted two factors, including reward probability and environmental suppressors, and a load of each item on its factor ranged from 0.519 to 0.744.The fitting indexes of confirmatory factor analysis were as follows: χ 2/ df=1.623, RMR=0.030, RMSEA=0.063, IFI=0.902, TLI=0.885, CFI =0.900.The internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's α) of the C-RPI was 0.800; and there was no ceiling/floor effect on each dimension and total scale. Conclusion:The classification of dimensions for the C-RPI is reasonable, and the scale has good reliability and validity to measure the ability to obtain environmental rewards for individuals with opioid dependence.