OBJECTIVETo compare the effect of electro-acupuncture (EA) and maprotiline (Map) in treating depression.

METHODSThirty patients of depression were treated with EA and 31 patients with Map orally taken respectively. The therapeutic effect and side-effect were evaluated by measurement of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Self-Rating Scale for Depression (SDS), Self-Rating Scale for Anxiety (SAS), Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) and Asberg Rating Scale for side-effects (ARS) before treatment and on the day 14, 28 and 42 of the therapeutic course.

RESULTSAfter treatment, the scores of HAMD and SDS lowered significantly (P < 0.01) than before treatment, and with insignificant difference between the group (P > 0.05). For patients with somatic syndrome, the HAMD score decrease rate was obviously higher in the Map group than that in the EA group. However, for the patients with anxiety somatization syndrome, the score of SAS, ARS in the EA group were significantly lower than those in the Map group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the efficacy index was higher in the EA group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONBoth EA and Map are effective in treating depression.

Acupuncture Therapy ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation ; therapeutic use ; Depression ; therapy ; Electroacupuncture ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Maprotiline ; therapeutic use ; Middle Aged

OBJECTIVETo observe the effect and side effect of Danzhi Xiaoyao powder (DXP) in treating depression.

METHODSA randomized controlled and double-blinded study was conducted in 63 cases of depression by divided them into the western medicine group (WMG, 31 cases) treated with maprotiline, and the Chinese medicine group (CMG, 32 cases) treated with DXP. The effect of therapy was evaluated before and at the 2nd, 4th and 6th week of the treatment with Hamilton's depressive scale (HAMD), self-rating depression scale (SDS), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and the scale for TCM syndrome and symptom differentiation (TCM-SSD), and the side-effect of therapy was assessed with Asberg side-effect scale as well.

RESULTSThere was no significant difference between the two groups in scores of HAMD, SDS, SAS, and TCM-SSD. The markedly effective rate in CMG was 84% and in WMG 87%, showed no significance between them (P > 0.05). The scores of HAMD, SDS and SAS of both groups were remarkably lowered after therapy (P < 0.05). However, the score of Asberg in CMG was lower than that in WMG (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONDXP shows the effect equivalent to that of maprotiline, but with obviously less side-effect.

Adult ; Antidepressive Agents ; therapeutic use ; Depressive Disorder ; drug therapy ; Double-Blind Method ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Maprotiline ; therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Phytotherapy ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales

OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical efficacy, adverse reaction and safety of Jieyu pill (JYP) in treating depression.

METHODSThe randomized controlled trial was conducted in 28 patients in the treated group and 29 patients in the control group treated with maprotiline (Map). The efficacy of treatment was evaluated before treatment and 14, 28 and 42 days after treatment, with Hamilton depression rating scale (HAMD), self-rating scale for depression (SDS), self-rating scale for anxiety (SAS) and clinical global impression (CGI), the adverse reaction was assessed by Asberg Rating Scale (ARS).

RESULTSJYP was effective in treating depression, the markedly effective rate being 78.8%, corresponded to that of Map (82.8%, P > 0.05). After treatment, the scores assessed by HAMD, SDS and SAS were all lower than those before treatment (P < 0.01) respectively, but comparison between the two groups showed insignificant difference (P > 0.05). However, scores of ARS were significantly lower in the treated group than that in the control group, and the efficacy index of JYP was significantly higher than that of Map (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONJYP in treating depression shows the efficacy corresponded to that of Map and with less adverse reaction.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Antidepressive Agents ; therapeutic use ; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation ; therapeutic use ; Depressive Disorder ; drug therapy ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Maprotiline ; therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Phytotherapy ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales