Objective This study aims to analyze the clinical epidemiology,diagnostic and treatment characteristics of minor patients with maxillofacial fracture and provide a reference for the prevention and treatment.Methods The clinical data of minor patients with maxillofacial fracture in Department of Traumatic and Plastic Surgery,West China Hospital of Stomatology,Sichuan University,from January 1,2015 to December 31,2020 were retrospectively studied and statistically analyzed in terms of age,gender,etiology,anatomic sites and treatment modalities.Results The mean age of the patients was(10.65±5.15)years,and the male-to-female ratio was 1.91∶1.High fall was the primary cause of maxillofacial fractures in minors aged 0-6 years.Traffic accident injuries were the main cause of maxillofacial fractures in minors aged 7-12 and 13-17 years.About 65.13%of the midface and 83.08%non-condylar fractures were mainly treated by surgery,and condylar fractures were treated conservatively in 74.73%and by surgical treatment in 25.27%.Conclusion The etiology of maxillofacial fractures in minors differs at different ages,so prevention strategies should be adjusted according to age.Surgical treatment has become the preferred treatment modality for midface and non-condylar fractures.Conservative treatment is still the main treatment method for condylar fractures,but the proportion of surgical treatment increases.

Objective To evaluate the predictive value of a dose-surface histogram (DSH) for radiation cystitis (RC) in patients with cervical cancer. Methods We retrospectively included 190 patients with cervical cancer who underwent image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) from the HIS system of The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University from May 2013 to May 2023. The patients were divided into test group (n = 100) and control group (n = 90). The dose distribution in the bladder was evaluated by using a DSH for the test group and using a dose-volume histogram (DVH) for the control group. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the predictive value of DSH for RC in comparison with DVH. Results There were no significant differences in baseline data and RC incidence between the two groups (all P＞0.05). All evaluation indicators were significantly different between DSH and DVH (all P＜0.05). The predictive value of S₄₅ and V₄₅ for the incidence of grade-I, -II, and -III RC was low (all P＜0.05). The predictive value of S₅₀ and V₅₀ for the incidence of grade-I, -II, and -III RC was moderate (all P＜0.05). S₅₅−S₅₇ and V₅₅−V₅₇ showed high value for predicting the incidence of grade-I, -II, and -III RC (all P＜0.05). Conclusion DSH shows basically the same predictive value for the incidence of RC caused by IGRT in cervical cancer as DVH, which is expected to become a new tool for evaluating radiotherapy plans.