1.Bilateral versus unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss
Maomei NI ; Dehong LI ; Weihui PENG ; Yikun PENG ; Juanjuan REN
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2010;(2):74-76
Objective:To analyze the clinical characteristics and treatment effect between bilateral(bi-)and unilateral(uni-) sudden sensorineural hearing loss(SSNHL).Method:Four hundred and eighty cases of SSNHL were retrospective study,which were divided into two groups of bi-SSNHL(n=40) and uni-SSNHL(n=440).Clinical characteristics and treatment effects were compared of the two groups.Result:The incidence rate of bi-SSNHL was 8.3 percent and uni-SSNHL was 91.7 percent of all patients with SSNHL. Bi-SSNHL occurs more commonly in patients of old age, diabetes mellitus, and lipid panes abnormalities compared to uni-SSNHL. Twenty-eight ears in the bi-SSNHL group showed hearing recovery (35%),compared with 56.4 percent of patients with uni-SSNHL.Conclusion:Bi-SSNHL and uni-SSNHL may have a completely different clinical characteristics and treatment effect,that implies a different pathophysiology and prognosis. Recognition their different clinical characteristics and treatment effect between bilateral and unilateral SSNHL can help in counseling and managing the patients and correctly evaluate the prognosis.
2.Bilateral versus unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
Maomei NI ; Dehong LI ; Weihui PENG ; Yikun PENG ; Juanjuan REN
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2010;24(2):74-76
OBJECTIVE:
To analyze the clinical characteristics and treatment effect between bilateral (bi-) and unilateral (uni-) sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).
METHOD:
Four hundred and eighty cases of SSNHL were retrospective study, which were divided into two groups of bi-SSNHL (n = 40) and uni-SSNHL (n = 440). Clinical characteristics and treatment effects were compared of the two groups.
RESULT:
The incidence rate of bi-SSNHL was 8.3 percent and uni-SSNHL was 91.7 percent of all patients with SSNHL. Bi-SSNHL occurs more commonly in patients of old age, diabetes mellitus, and lipid panes abnormalities compared to uni-SSNHL. Twenty-eight ears in the bi-SSNHL group showed hearing recovery (35%), compared with 56.4 percent of patients with uni-SSNHL.
CONCLUSION
Bi-SSNHL and uni-SSNHL may have a completely different clinical characteristics and treatment effect, that implies a different pathophysiology and prognosis. Recognition their different clinical characteristics and treatment effect between bilateral and unilateral SSNHL can help in counseling and managing the patients and correctly evaluate the prognosis.
Adult
;
Female
;
Hearing Loss, Bilateral
;
diagnosis
;
therapy
;
Hearing Loss, Sudden
;
diagnosis
;
therapy
;
Hearing Loss, Unilateral
;
diagnosis
;
therapy
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Prognosis
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Treatment Outcome