1.Analysis on the Factors affecting platelet transfusion efficacy
Maoling WANG ; Tingting ZHAO ; Mei YANG ; Jiahuan YANG ; Bangquan AN ; Shiqin XIA ; Li SU
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine 2015;(3):296-297,300
Objective To investigate the factors affecting platelet transfusion efficiency.Methods A total of 102 cases of leuke-mia patients were recruited in the study,whose platelet count were measured before platelet transfusion and 1,24 h after platelet transfusion,then corrected count increment(CCI)values were calculated.By using CCI combined with clinical manifestations,the ef-ficacy of platelet transfusion were evaluated.The platelet antibody were detected before platelet transfusion.Depending on whether there were platelet antibodies,complications,the number of times of platelet transfusion,the types of platelet,patients were grouped and their platelet transfusion efficiency and CCI values were compared.Results The total effective rate of platelet transfusions were 71.6%(73/102 ).Invalid transfusion group had higher platelet antibody positive rate (17.2%)than effective transfusion group (2.7%),the difference were statistically significant(P <0.05).Among the groups of different transfusion times,the tansfusion effi-ciency was statistically different(P <0.05).With the increase of the number of times of platelet transfusion,the platelet transfusion efficiency decreased.Comparison between different types of platelets showed different platelet transfusion efficiency,which was sta-tistically significant(P <0.05).1 h and 24 h CCI value,platelet antibodies and whether patients with complications were related(P<0.05).1 h and 24 h CCI values were both associated with platelet antibodies and complications(P <0.05).Conclusion Platelet antibodies,complications,times of platelet transfusion and types of platelet transfusion are affecting factors of the transfusion effica-cy in patients with leukemia.
2.Effect of early mobilization on diaphragmatic function in patients with mechanical ventilation: a prospective randomized controlled study
Shengqiang YANG ; Jinggang LIU ; Wenbao YANG ; Jiyin YUAN ; Suqiu MENG ; Maoling LIANG ; Qibiao SHI
Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2018;30(2):112-116
Objective To investigate the effect of early mobilization on diaphragmatic function in patients with mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods Sixty chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation (AECOPD) patients with respiratory failure (RF) and underwent MV admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) of Huxi Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical College from January 2016 to January 2017 were enrolled. The patients were divided into treatment group (n = 30) and control group (n = 30) by randomly number table method. The two groups were given analgesia, sedation, MV, antibiotics, nutritional support and other treatments. An implementation plan was developed based on the clinical practice of pain, irritability and delirium in adult patients (PAD) with ICU, while the treatment group was given early mobilization (such as joint activity, stand to the bed, 3 times a day). The diaphragmatic thickness at the end of expiration (DTee), diaphragmatic thickness at the end of inspiration (DTei) and diaphragmatic thickening fraction (DTF) were measured by bedside ultrasonography before and 24 hours, 48 hours, 3 days and 5 days after treatment respectively. Results There were no significant differences in the parameters of the diaphragm before treatment between the two groups. In the control group, DTee was gradually decreased at 5 days after treatment and was significantly lower than that before treatment (cm: 0.26±0.06 vs. 0.28±0.08, t = 3.045, 1 = 0.005). While there was no significant change in DTee in the treatment group. There was no significant difference in DTee between the two groups at different time points after treatment. DTei and DTF were significantly increased in the two groups after treatment, and reached the peak value at 48 hours; with the prolonged of MV time, DTei and DTF in the control group at 3 days and 5 days were significantly lower than those at 48 hours [DTei (cm): 0.35±0.07, 0.34±0.07 vs. 0.36±0.08; DTF: (29.29±11.01)%, (28.62±11.97)% vs. (32.48±15.63)%, all 1 < 0.01]; there were no significant changes in the treatment group. DTF in the treatment group at 3 days and 5 days was significantly higher than that in the control groups [(38.53±11.39)% vs. (29.29±11.01)%, (37.27±11.26)% vs. (28.62±11.97)%, both 1 < 0.01]. Conclusion MV can lead to diaphragmatic dysfunction, while early mobilization can delay diaphragmatic atrophy and systolic dysfunction in MV patients.
3.Relationship between perceived organizational support and occupational pressure of general practitioners: the mediating role of professional identity
Yanchao LI ; Shue ZHANG ; Jin ZHANG ; Jiaming XU ; Zhen WANG ; Maoling YANG ; Chenxi ZHAO ; Qingling LI ; Jing TIAN ; Liyan ZHU ; Libin YANG ; Depin CAO
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 2020;19(5):609-614
Objective:To investigate the current situation of general practitioners' occupational pressure in Heilongjiang Province, and explore its relationship with professional identity and perceived organizational support. It aims to provide references for the construction of general practitioners and the development of general medical education.Methods:The general situation questionnaire, perceived organizational support scale, occupational pressure scale, and professional identity scale were applied through network and site surveys for collecting data. A total of 288 questionnaires were collected with 263 valid questionnaires (91.3%). Pearson correction analysis and bootstrap analysis were performed for data analysis.Results:The average score of occupational pressure among general practitioners was (115.95±22.40), and the results of Pearson correction analysis showed that perceived organizational support was negatively correlated with occupational pressure ( r=-0.413, P<0.01) and positive correlation with professional identity ( r=0.587, P<0.01). There were also significant negative correlations between professional identity and occupational pressure ( r=-0.442, P<0.01). Moreover, the mediating effect showed that professional identity had a certain mediating effect on the relationship between perceived organizational support and occupational pressure (LLCI=-0.2039, ULCI=-0.0760, P<0.05). Conclusion:General practitioners' occupational pressure was at a high level, which can be reduced through improving the perceived organizational support and professional identity.
4.Effect of respiratory mechanics-guided sedation strategy on diaphragm function in mechanical ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Zhen LIU ; Suqiu MENG ; Yang WU ; Maoling LIANG ; Qibiao SHI ; Shengqiang YANG
Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2022;34(7):699-703
Objective:To investigate the effects of respiratory mechanics-guided sedation strategy on diaphragm function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients treated with mechanical ventilation (MV).Methods:A prospective study was conducted. Patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) received invasive MV who were admitted to the Affiliated Huxi Hospital of Jining Medical University from May 2020 to May 2021 were enrolled. The patients were divided into observational group and control group by random number table method. All patients were intubated for MV, and received bronchodilators, glucocorticoid, anti-infectives, expectorant, nutritional support, analgesia and sedation. The sedatives were dexmedetomidine combined with propofol, and the analgesics were sufentanil in both groups. Respiratory mechanics monitoring was performed every 6 hours in the observational group, and the depth of sedation was adjusted according to the parameters of respiratory mechanics: when airway resistance (Raw) > 20 cmH 2O·L -1·s -1, deep sedation was given to maintain Richmond agitation-sedation scale (RASS) ≤ -3; when the Raw was 10-20 cmH 2O·L -1·s -1, the initial depth of sedation maintained to reach the RASS score of -2-0; when Raw < 10 cmH 2O·L -1·s -1, withdrawn the sedation, or given light sedation, and maintained the RASS score of -2-0. While the control group received light sedation. The patients' diaphragmatic excursions (DE) was measured by bedside ultrasound, tidal volume (VT) and respiratory rate (RR) were recorded, and the diaphragmatic rapid shallow breathing index (D-RSBI, D-RSBI = RR/DE) and diaphragmatic excursion efficiency (DEE, DEE = VT/DE) were calculated. The differences in DE, D-RSBI, and DEE before and 3 days and 5 days of treatment between the two groups were compared. The difference in the RASS score within 3 days of sedation between the two groups was compared. The differences in the duration of MV and 28-day mortality between the two groups were compared. Results:A total of 96 patients were selected. Six patients were excluded due to delirium or the duration of MV shorter than 3 days. Finally, 90 patients were enrolled, with 46 in the observational group, and 44 in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences in DE, D-RSBI or DEE before treatment between the two groups. After treatment, D-RSBI in both groups was gradually decreased, and DEE was gradually increased with time. The D-RSBI at 3 days and 5 days of treatment in the observational group were significantly lower than those in the control group (times·min -1·mm -1: 1.73±0.48 vs. 1.96±0.35 at 3 days, 1.45±0.64 vs. 1.72±0.40 at 5 days, both P < 0.05), and DEE were significantly higher than those in the control group (mL/mm: 19.7±4.3 vs. 17.1±3.9 at 3 days, 25.8±5.6 vs. 22.9±5.4 at 5 days, both P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in DE at all time points between the two groups. The RASS scores within 2 hours of sedation in the observational group were significantly lower than those in the control group (1 day: -3.78±0.92 vs. -2.34±0.68, 2 days: -2.87±1.04 vs. -2.43±0.79, both P < 0.05), while no statistical difference at 3 days was found between the two groups. The duration of MV in the observational group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (days: 5.78±2.01 vs. 6.84±2.27, P < 0.05). One patient died in each of the control group and the observational group, and there was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality between the two groups (2.3% vs. 2.2%, P > 0.05). Conclusion:For AECOPD patients undergoing MV, respiratory mechanics-guided sedation strategy can reduce D-RSBI, increase DEE, shorten the duration of MV, and have a certain protective effect on the diaphragm.