Objective:To investigate the intra- and inter-observer agreements of different experiencers using the Ovaria-adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) in the evaluation of adnexal masses.Methods:Totally 48 patients with adnexal masses (48 masses, mean size 9.5±4.7 cm, range 2.3-18.6 cm) found by ultrasound examination in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, from May 2019 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. All the masses were confirmed by pathology or surgery. Four observers were divided into 2 senior doctors (Doctor 1 and Doctor 2) and 2 junior doctors (Doctor 3 and Doctor 4). Each observer independently evaluated adnexal masses twice using ultrasound O-RADS before and after systematic training, with an interval of 60 days. The intra-observer and inter-observer agreements were analyzed before and after training.Results:The inter-observer agreement between senior doctors were both excellent before and after systematic training (weight Kappa: 0.833 vs 0.802, percentage of agreement: 83.3% vs 81.3%). Whereas there was difference in the inter-observer agreement between non-experienced observers before and after training (weight Kappa: 0.399 vs 0.824, percentage of agreement: 50.0% vs 77.1%). After training, inter-observer agreement between junior doctors was significantly improved and comparable to senior (weight Kappa: 0.824 vs 0.802, percentage of agreement: 77.1% vs 81.3%). Before and after systematic training, the intra-observer agreements of the same doctor, the senior physicians were better than the junior (weight Kappa: 0.882 and 0.843 vs 0.440 and 0.605; percentage of agreement: 87.5% and 83.3% vs 58.3% and 54.2%).Conclusions:O-RADS risk classification system is a highly reproducible method in the subjective assessment of an adnexal mass among observers with varying levels of expertise. However, systematic training before clinical application is necessary and effective for non-experienced observers.

Objective:To investigate the value of translabial ultrasound (TLUS) in female periurethral benign solid lesions (PBSL).Methods:Twenty-one female patients (21 lesions) with PBSL identified pathologically within the process of cystoscope or surgery from June 2017 to December 2020 were enrolled. All of them underwent urethral examination (UE) and TLUS. The detection rates of the lesions of UE and TLUS were compared, and the ultrasonic diagnostic accuracy and ultrasonic manifestations were analyzed.Results:Sixteen of the 21 patients showed lower urinary tract symptoms (76.19%). Among the 21 lesions, the detection rates of UE and TLUS were 52.38% (11/21) and 85.71% (18/21), respectively, the difference was statistically significant ( P=0.019). The length of 18 lesions detected by TLUS was (1.79±1.04)cm, and 13 lesions (72.22%) were shorter than 3 cm. Among 18 cases, urethral caruncle (13 cases) was the most common benign periurethral mass, the main ultrasonic manifestations of urethral caruncle showed hyperecho lesions in the middle and distal urethra, and the blood flow was mostly in a branch-like distribution. At the same time, there were 5 cases of urethral myoma and other solid lesions, the main ultrasonic manifestations of urethral myoma showed clear boundary, low echo and peripheral short strip blood flow. Using pathological results as the gold standard, the accuracy of ultrasonic diagnosis was 88.89% (16/18). Conclusions:TLUS is able to improve the detection rate of periurethral benign solid lesions, and the diagnostic concordant rate is acceptable.TLUS can provide more diagnostic and therapeutic information.

Objective:To evaluate the application of a medical image software (RadiAnt) in anatomical measurements and precision craniotomy via suboccipital retrosigmoid sinus approach.Methods:A total of 43 inpatients who underwent craniocerebral CT venography (CTV) in our hospital from June 2020 to June 2021 were selected for the study; the CTV data of 35 patients was used to measure the spatial relations between transverse sigmoid sinus junction (TSSJ) and asterion; the preoperative planning in suboccipital retrosigmoid sinus craniotomy with the software was performed in the left 8 patients. Craniotomy time (subjected to exposure of venous sinus margin), venous sinus injury and incidence of complications within 2 weeks of craniotomy in these 8 patients were recorded.Results:(1) Anatomic measurement: for the left side, TSSJ was located at (0.89±0.33) cm lateral and (0.63±0.46) cm inferior to the asterion, and their direct distance was (1.15±0.42) cm; TSSJ was located at (0.76±0.49) cm interior and (1.97±0.52) cm superior to the starting point of the mastoid notch, and their direct distance was (2.18±0.49) cm; about 29% asterion were located superior to the transverse sinus, 37% were located on the surface of the transverse sinus, and 34% were located inferior to the transverse sinus. For the right side, TSSJ was located at (0.88±0.39) cm lateral and (0.64±0.43) cm inferior to the asterion, and their direct distance was (1.12±0.54) cm; TSSJ was located at (0.74±0.40) cm interior and (1.93±0.45) cm superior to the starting point of the mastoid notch, and their direct distance was (2.16±0.43) cm; about 26% asterion were located superior to the transverse sinus, 40% were located on the surface of the transverse sinus, and 34% were located inferior to the transverse sinus. (2) Preoperative planning and surgeries: in these 8 patients, the key-hole was located at (0.96±0.49) cm lateral and (0.53±0.18) cm inferior to the asterion, and (0.46±0.35) cm interior and (1.76±0.47) superior to the starting point of mastoid notch. The interior of sigmoid sinus was located (0.13±0.51) cm interior and (0.21±0.46) cm superior to the starting point of mastoid notch. The inferior of the transverse sinus was located (2.17±0.45) cm interior and (0.53±0.35) cm inferior to the asterion. An accurate localization of the real position of TSSJ, inferior of transverse sinus and interior of sigmoid sinus was performed in all 8 surgical patients. The distance between the margin of the bone window and the interior of sigmoid sinus was (3.5±1.0) mm, and the craniotomy time was (25.7±4.1) min; no sinus injury was noted. Post-operative CT showed good reposition of the bone flaps and less bone defect. There was no cerebrospinal fluid leakage or subcutaneous effusion during the 2 weeks of follow-up.Conclusion:Anatomical measurements and preoperative planning can be quickly finished with low cost with Radiant ?, which provides an efficient and safe method for accurate craniotomy via suboccipital retrosigmoid approach.

AIM: Previous studies have suggested that big stick design (BSD) method can only be used in clinical trials of two treatments with equal proportion, which has good statistical performance and has become the recommended choice of randomized methods. This study expands BSD method, so that it can be applied to three groups, and provides more randomized methods for clinical trials. METHODS: On the basis of BSD method used in two treatments with equal proportion, the derivation conditional allocation probability of BSD method used in three treatments with equal proportion was carried out. BSD method was compared with simple randomization (SR) method, permuted block design (PBD) method and block urn design (BUD) method by Monte-Carlo simulation in balance and randomness. RESULTS: In terms of balance, PBD method was the best, followed by BUD method, BSD method, and SR method was the worst. In terms of randomness, SR method was the best, followed by BSD method, BUD method and PBD method. The comprehensive performance showed that BSD method was better than BUD method, PBD method and SR method. CONCLUSION: The expanded BSD method used in three treatments with equal proportion has good comprehensive performance, and it can be the recommended randomization method for clinical trials of three treatments with equal proportion.