1.Is Abnormality in the Conventional Anorectal Manometry Really Abnormal?.
Hyun Il SEO ; Jung Ho PARK ; Chong Il SOHN
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2010;16(2):213-214
No abstract available.
Manometry
2.Use of Solid Boluses in High-resolution Manometry.
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2013;19(4):422-423
No abstract available.
Manometry*
3.Esophageal Disorders Not Yet Addressed by High-resolution Manometry.
Frederic NICODEME ; John E PANDOLFINO
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2013;19(1):114-115
No abstract available.
Manometry
4.Three-dimension High-resolution Anorectal Manometry Can Precisely Measure Perineal Descent.
Veronique VITTON ; Jean Charles GRIMAUD ; Michel BOUVIER
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2013;19(2):257-258
No abstract available.
Manometry
5.Clinical Significance of Esophageal Hypertensive Peristaltic Contractions on High-resolution Manometry.
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2015;21(4):616-617
No abstract available.
Manometry*
6.Typical Finding of Mechanical Obstruction Suggested in High-resolution Manometry.
Hyung Hun KIM ; Moo In PARK ; Seun Ja PARK ; Won MOON
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2012;18(3):336-337
No abstract available.
Manometry
7.Efficacy of Each Parameter in Clinical Application of Rectoanal Inhibitory Reflex.
Moo Kyung SEONG ; Young Bum YOO ; Byung Ki PARK
Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology 2005;21(1):1-5
PURPOSE: Recently, analytical studies of the various parameters of rectoanal inhibitory reflex were reported and revealed that many of the parameters showed significant differences according to the anal continence function. The standardization of these studies is, however, not yet sufficient enough to apply to use those parameters in reflex test for clinical practice. The aim of this study was to check how the parameters react differently to various degrees of rectal distention and to determine the efficacy of each parameter in clinical applications of rectoanal inhibitory reflex. METHODS: Thirty-two subjects underwent repeated manometries for rectoanal inhibitory reflex with different volumes (40, 60, 80 cc) of rectal ballooning. Latencies, amplitudes, slopes, durations, and areas under the reflex curves of the reflexes were measured, and the differences among them according to the ballooning volume in each subject were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: The area under reflex curve, the amplitude, the duration, and the slope did not differ statistically with the ballooning volume (P values were 0.3959, 0.2142, 0.2080, 0.1453, respectively, by repeated measures two way ANOVA). However, the latencies did differ significantly (P=0.0131). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the parameters except latency were stable against different volumes of rectal ballooning. Among the stable parameters, the area under the reflex curve seemed to be the most useful in clinical applications of rectoanal inhibitory reflex.
Manometry
;
Reflex*
9.High-resolution Anorectal Manometry and Anal Endosonographic Findings in the Evaluation of Fecal Incontinence.
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2012;18(4):450-451
No abstract available.
Fecal Incontinence
;
Manometry
10.High-resolution Anorectal Manometry for Acquired Megarectum in a Patient With Parkinson's Disease.
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2012;18(2):218-219
No abstract available.
Humans
;
Manometry
;
Parkinson Disease
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail