1.Cardiac complication secondary to jugular catheter insertion in a renal failure patient
Manickam RANGASAMI ; Muhammad KHALIL ; Jayashree RANGASAMI ; Jackson Chee Seng TAN
Brunei International Medical Journal 2010;6(3):140-144
Central venous catheterisation is a common procedure performed for emergency dialysis. It is usually carried out without any cardiac monitoring. Cardiac arrhythmias with associated conduction blocks are rare complications. The underlying pathogenesis is trauma to the endocardium by the guide wire or catheter. It occurs more frequently in patients with acute renal failure and azotaemia than patients with established end stage renal disease. Disturbances in acid base balance and electrolyte abnormalities are contributing factors. Fortunately, most are benign but occasionally can lead to potentially fatal arrhythmias. We report a case of a 46-year-old lady with end stage renal failure secondary to diabetes mellitus who developed runs of transient ventricular ectopics and right bundle branch block during internal jugular catheterisation. This spontaneously resolved 12 hours later.
2.Aluminium exposure in haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients: Experience of a single centre
Manickam RANGASAMI ; Tholappan RAJENDRAN ; Joseph CHAKKO ; Jayashree RANGASAMI ; Muhammad Abdul Mabood KHALIL ; Sartaj ALAM ; Jackson TAN
Brunei International Medical Journal 2012;8(4):173-178
Introduction: Aluminium exposure and toxicity are uncommon in humans. However it may occur in patients on long term haemodialysis (HD) due to water exposure during treatment. We retrospectively assessed the extent of aluminium exposure in our HD and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients from 2002 to 2008. Materials and Methods: The study population included 43 HD patients and 77 PD patients whose blood samples were collected at four monthly intervals. In addition, HD patients were also interviewed on lifestyle factors (aluminium cookware, diet, aluminium-containing medications and tap water consumption) that may impact on serum aluminium levels. Reverse osmosis (RO) water aluminium levels were also collected during this timeframe. Results: More patients on HD had readings above the accepted range (>0.01mg/L) than peritoneal dialysis (36.9% vs. 23.8%). The mean aluminium values for HD and PD patients were 63.35 ± 34.69μg/L and 38.34 ± 17.02μg/L respectively (p<0.05). Use of aluminium cookware was identified as a risk factor for high aluminium readings in HD patients. The trend of serum aluminium correlated with that of RO water aluminium during the studied period. There was no evidence of clinical toxicity in our patients during follow up. Conclusion: The study showed that HD patients are at a higher risk of aluminium toxicity compared to PD patients. Treated RO water aluminium should be analysed on a regular basis to prevent aluminium toxicity in HD patients. Lifestyle factors may have an impact on aluminium levels in patients with renal disease.
Complications
;
Dialysis
;
Heavy Metal Toxicity
;
Risk Factors