1.Pulmonary Metastases After Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.
Masahito KIDO ; Hidetoshi KURUMA ; Hiroshi SASAKI ; Kenta MIKI ; Manabu AOKI ; Takahiro KIMURA ; Hiroyuki TAKAHASH ; Chihiro KANEHIRA ; Shin EGAWA
Korean Journal of Urology 2014;55(5):309-314
PURPOSE: To analyze unusual events and focus discussion on pulmonary metastasis in particular after low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) for prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 616 consecutive patients who had undergone LDR-BT for clinically localized PCa at Jikei University Hospital between October 2003 and April 2010 were enrolled in this study. Follow-up information was summarized, and patterns of biochemical recurrence and clinical outcome were investigated. RESULTS: Disease risk was stratified as low-risk in 231 patients, intermediate-risk in 365, and high-risk in 20, respectively. Of these patients, 269 (43.7%) had received hormonal therapy (HT) in combination with LDR-BT, and 80 (13.0%) had received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Average dosimetric parameter values with and without EBRT were 95.3% and 94.2% for V100, 132.8 Gy and 164.2 Gy for D90, and 180.6 Gy2 and 173.7 Gy2 for the biologically effective dose. Biochemical recurrence was noted in 14 patients (6.1%) in the low-risk group, 25 patients (6.8%) in the intermediate-risk group, and 6 patients (30.0%) in the high-risk group, respectively. In these cases of biochemical recurrence, 9 (64.3%), 13 (52.0%), and 4 patients (66.7%) in each respective risk group showed signs of clinical recurrence. Five patients (19.2%) with clinical recurrence developed pulmonary metastases, of which 4 were isolated lesions. All tumors responded favorably to subsequent HT. CONCLUSIONS: LDR-BT for biologically aggressive PCa may be linked to possible pulmonary metastasis owing to tumor dissemination during seed implantation. This information is important in planning adequate treatment for these patients.
Brachytherapy*
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Neoplasm Metastasis*
;
Passive Cutaneous Anaphylaxis
;
Prostatic Neoplasms*
;
Radiotherapy
;
Recurrence
2.Lymphadenectomy for primary ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Tatsuyuki CHIYODA ; Manabu SAKURAI ; Toyomi SATOH ; Satoru NAGASE ; Mikio MIKAMI ; Hidetaka KATABUCHI ; Daisuke AOKI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2020;31(5):e67-
Objective:
To assess the effectiveness of lymphadenectomy at primary debulking surgery (PDS) on the survival of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).
Methods:
We searched PubMed, Ichushi, and the Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective cohort studies comparing survival of women with EOC undergoing lymphadenectomy at PDS with that of women without lymphadenectomy were included. We performed a meta-analysis of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events.
Results:
For advanced-stage EOC, 2 RCTs including 1,074 women and 7 cohort studies comprising 3,161 women were evaluated. Meta-analysis revealed that lymphadenectomy was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.70– 0.90). However, meta-analysis of 2 RCTs revealed no significant difference in OS between the lymphadenectomy and no-lymphadenectomy groups (OS: HR=1.02; 95% CI=0.85–1.22).For early-stage EOC, 1 RCT comprising 268 women and 4 cohort studies comprising 14,228 women were evaluated. Meta-analysis showed that lymphadenectomy was associated with improved OS (HR=0.75; 95% CI=0.68–0.82). A RCT of early-stage EOC reported that lymphadenectomy was not associated with improved OS (HR=0.85; 95% CI=0.49–1.47).Surgery-related deaths were similar in both groups (risk ratio [RR]=1.00; 95% CI=0.99–1.01);however, blood transfusion was required less frequently in the no-lymphadenectomy group (RR=0.74; 95% CI=0.63–0.86).
Conclusions
Meta-analysis of RCTs and observational studies suggest that lymphadenectomy was associated with improved OS in advanced- and early-stage EOC.However, results from RCTs demonstrate that lymphadenectomy was not associated with improved OS in advanced- and early-stage EOC.
3.Appendix 1
Masao IWAGAMI ; Kotonari AOKI ; Manabu AKAZAWA ; Chieko ISHIGURO ; Shinobu IMAI ; Nobuhiro OOBA ; Makiko KUSAMA ; Daisuke KOIDE ; Atsushi GOTO ; Norihiro KOBAYASHI ; Izumi SATO ; Sayuri NAKANE ; Makoto MIYAZAKI ; Kiyoshi KUBOTA
Japanese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology 2018;23(2):124-124
4.Appendix 2
Masao IWAGAMI ; Kotonari AOKI ; Manabu AKAZAWA ; Chieko ISHIGURO ; Shinobu IMAI ; Nobuhiro OOBA ; Makiko KUSAMA ; Daisuke KOIDE ; Atsushi GOTO ; Norihiro KOBAYASHI ; Izumi SATO ; Sayuri NAKANE ; Makoto MIYAZAKI ; Kiyoshi KUBOTA
Japanese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology 2018;23(2):125-130
5.Appendix 3
Masao IWAGAMI ; Kotonari AOKI ; Manabu AKAZAWA ; Chieko ISHIGURO ; Shinobu IMAI ; Nobuhiro OOBA ; Makiko KUSAMA ; Daisuke KOIDE ; Atsushi GOTO ; Norihiro KOBAYASHI ; Izumi SATO ; Sayuri NAKANE ; Makoto MIYAZAKI ; Kiyoshi KUBOTA
Japanese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology 2018;23(2):131-139
6.Appendix 4
Masao IWAGAMI ; Kotonari AOKI ; Manabu AKAZAWA ; Chieko ISHIGURO ; Shinobu IMAI ; Nobuhiro OOBA ; Makiko KUSAMA ; Daisuke KOIDE ; Atsushi GOTO ; Norihiro KOBAYASHI ; Izumi SATO ; Sayuri NAKANE ; Makoto MIYAZAKI ; Kiyoshi KUBOTA
Japanese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology 2018;23(2):140-143
7.Appendix 5
Masao IWAGAMI ; Kotonari AOKI ; Manabu AKAZAWA ; Chieko ISHIGURO ; Shinobu IMAI ; Nobuhiro OOBA ; Makiko KUSAMA ; Daisuke KOIDE ; Atsushi GOTO ; Norihiro KOBAYASHI ; Izumi SATO ; Sayuri NAKANE ; Makoto MIYAZAKI ; Kiyoshi KUBOTA
Japanese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology 2018;23(2):144-146
8.Task Force Report on the Validation of Diagnosis Codes and Other Outcome Definitions in the Japanese Receipt Data
Masao IWAGAMI ; Kotonari AOKI ; Manabu AKAZAWA ; Chieko ISHIGURO ; Shinobu IMAI ; Nobuhiro OOBA ; Makiko KUSAMA ; Daisuke KOIDE ; Atsushi GOTO ; Norihiro KOBAYASHI ; Izumi SATO ; Sayuri NAKANE ; Makoto MIYAZAKI ; Kiyoshi KUBOTA
Japanese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology 2018;23(2):95-123
Although the recent revision of the ministerial ordinance on Good Post-marketing Study Practice (GPSP) included the utilization of medical information databases for post-marketing surveillance, there has been limited research on the validity of diagnosis codes and other outcome definitions in Japanese databases such as administrative claims (“receipt”) database. This task force proposed how to conduct good validations studies, based on the narrative review on around 100 published papers around the world. The established check list consists of : (ⅰ) understanding the type of the database (e.g. administrative claims data, electronic health records, disease registry) ; (ii) understanding the setting of the validation study (e.g. “population-based” or not) ; (iii) defining the study outcome ; (iv) determining the way of linkage between databases ; (v) defining the gold standard ; (vi) selecting the sampling method (e.g. using the information of all patients in the database or a hospital, random sampling from all patients, random sampling from patients satisfying the outcome definition, random sampling from patients satisfying and not satisfying the outcome definition, “all possible cases” method) and sample size ; (vii) calculating the measures of validity (e.g. sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) ; and (viii) discussing how to use the result for future studies. In current Japan, where the linkage between databases is logistically and legally difficult, most validation studies would to be conducted on a hospital basis. In such a situation, detailed description of hospital and patient characteristics is important to discuss the generalizability of the validation study result to the entire database. This report is expected to encourage and help to conduct appropriate validation studies.
9.Delayed surgical site infection after posterior cervical instrumented surgery in a patient with atopic dermatitis: a case report
Hiroshi TAKAHASHI ; Yasuchika AOKI ; Shinji TANIGUCHI ; Arata NAKAJIMA ; Masato SONOBE ; Yorikazu AKATSU ; Junya SAITO ; Manabu YAMADA ; Yasuhiro SHIGA ; Kazuhide INAGE ; Sumihisa ORITA ; Yawara EGUCHI ; Satoshi MAKI ; Takeo FURUYA ; Tsutomu AKAZAWA ; Masao KODA ; Masashi YAMAZAKI ; Seiji OHTORI ; Koichi NAKAGAWA
Journal of Rural Medicine 2020;15(3):124-129
Objective: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the known risk factors for Staphylococcus aureus infection. The authors report the case of a patient with cervical spondylosis and AD who developed delayed surgical site infection after posterior cervical instrumented surgery.Patient: A 39-year-old male presented to our hospital with paralysis of the left upper extremity without any cause or prior injury. He had a history of severe AD. We performed C3–C7 posterior decompression and instrumented fusion based on the diagnosis of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. One year after surgery, his deltoid and bicep muscle strength were fully recovered. Nevertheless, his neck pain worsened 2 years after surgery following worsening of AD. One month after that, he developed severe myelopathy and was admitted to our hospital. Radiographic findings showed that all the screws had loosened and the retropharyngeal space had expanded. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography showed severe abscess formation and destruction of the C7/T1 vertebrae.Result: We diagnosed him with delayed surgical site infection. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was identified on abscess culture. The patient responded adequately to treatment with antibiotic therapy and two debridements and the infection subsided.Conclusion: We should consider the possibility of delayed surgical site infection when conducting instrumented spinal surgery in patients with severe AD.