Palliative care outreach in communities without specialists is important, but its effectiveness has not yet been clarified in Japan. The current study aimed to identify interventional targets of palliative care outreach in home care in a community without specialists. We conducted a questionnaire survey (five-point scale) of home care nurses’ attitudes, difficulties, and practices for palliative care among 39 nurses working at five visiting nurse stations in Tome city. Difficulties in “symptom palliation” and “communication with medical practitioners” were high. Nurses tended to have low confidence and high motivation. Items with particularly low confidence were “communication with home care physicians” and “staff support”. Practices in “communication with physicians” and “coordination with care person” were low. Our survey identified enhancement of face to face relationships and support for home care nurses to improve their skills and confidence as interventional targets for palliative care outreach.

This study aimed to clarify the resources required to relieve distress during palliative care delivery to cancer patients. Between April 2015 and March 2017, 1479 outpatients receiving chemotherapy for cancer were screened using the Japanese version of the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS-J). When the STAS-J result was 2 points and higher, the patient was considered positive for distress. A certified nurse or pharmacist performed STAS-J screening and, in cases where the patient exhibited distress, took steps to alleviate the problem themselves or consulted another resource. Distress was identified in 181 (12.2%) of the 1479 patients. These 181 patients needed 288 resources. The resources used to alleviate distress were categorized as follows: direct support by certified nurse or pharmacist (153), consultation with the attending physician (98) and other (37). The required resource included the following twelve professionals: attending physician, ophthalmologist, dermatologist, dentist, orthopedic surgeon, palliative care physician, certified nurse, certified pharmacist, medical social worker, clinical psychologist, volunteers for cancer patients, and palliative care team. The frequency of the intervention by the certified nurse or pharmacist (61, 39.9%) in directly alleviating psychiatric distress was significantly higher than by consultation with the attending physician (10, 10.2%) (p<0.0001). However, the frequency of consultation with the attending physician in alleviating physical distress (88, 89.8%) was significantly higher than that of the certified nurse or pharmacist (92, 60.1%) (p<0.0001). We conclude that the certified nurse or pharmacist is important for the delivery of palliative cancer care, because they can directly provide relief from psychiatric distress.

Objective: Combination therapy with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir (G/P) has been shown to provide a sustained virologic response (SVR) rate of >97% in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the first published real-world Japanese data. However, a recently published study showed that the treatment was often discontinued in patients ≥75 years old, resulting in low SVR in intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Thus, our aim was to evaluate real-world data for G/P therapy in patients ≥75 years of age, the population density of which is high in “rural” regions.Patients and Methods: We conducted a multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of G/P therapy for chronic HCV infection, in the North Kanto area in Japan.Results: Of the 308 patients enrolled, 294 (95.5%) completed the treatment according to the protocol. In ITT and per-protocol analyses, the overall SVR12 rate was 97.1% and 99.7%, respectively. The old-aged patients group consisted of 59 participants, 56 of whom (94.9%) completed the scheduled protocol. Although old-aged patients tended to have non-SVR factors such as liver cirrhosis, history of HCC, and prior DAA therapies, the SVR12 rates in old-aged patients were 98.3% and 100% in the ITT and PP analyses, respectively. Of 308 patients enrolled, adverse events were observed in 74 patients (24.0%), with grade ≥3 events in 8 patients (2.6%). There was no significant difference in any grade and grade ≥3 adverse events between the old-aged group and the rest of the study participants. Only one patient discontinued the treatment because of adverse events.Conclusion: G/P therapy is effective and safe for old-aged patients.