1.Perspectives for Concepts of Individualized Radionuclide Therapy, Molecular Radiotherapy, and Theranostic Approaches
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2019;53(3):167-171
Radionuclide therapy (RNT) stands on the delivery of radiation to tumors or non-tumor target organs using radiopharmaceuticals that are designed to have specific affinity to targets. RNT is recently called molecular radiotherapy (MRT) by some advocators in order to emphasize its characteristics as radiotherapy and the relevance of dosimetry-guided optimization of treatment. Moreover, RNT requires relevant radiation protection standards because it employs unsealed radionuclides and gives therapeutic radiation doses in humans. On the basis of these radiation protection standards, the development and use of radiopharmaceuticals for combined application through diagnostics and therapeutics lead to theranostic approaches that will enhance the efficacy and safety of treatment by implementing dosimetry-based individualization.
Humans
;
Radiation Protection
;
Radioisotopes
;
Radiopharmaceuticals
;
Radiotherapy
;
Theranostic Nanomedicine
2.Perspectives for Concepts of Individualized Radionuclide Therapy, Molecular Radiotherapy, and Theranostic Approaches
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2019;53(3):167-171
Radionuclide therapy (RNT) stands on the delivery of radiation to tumors or non-tumor target organs using radiopharmaceuticals that are designed to have specific affinity to targets. RNT is recently called molecular radiotherapy (MRT) by some advocators in order to emphasize its characteristics as radiotherapy and the relevance of dosimetry-guided optimization of treatment. Moreover, RNT requires relevant radiation protection standards because it employs unsealed radionuclides and gives therapeutic radiation doses in humans. On the basis of these radiation protection standards, the development and use of radiopharmaceuticals for combined application through diagnostics and therapeutics lead to theranostic approaches that will enhance the efficacy and safety of treatment by implementing dosimetry-based individualization.
3.Surgery for Aortic Valve Stenosis in a Patient with an Anomalous Origin of the Left Coronary Artery
Yasuyuki Bito ; Hidekazu Hirai ; Yasuyuki Sasaki ; Mitsuharu Hosono ; Atsushi Nakahira ; Yasuo Suehiro ; Yuko Kubota ; Daisuke Kaku ; Makoto Miyabe ; Shigefumi Suehiro
Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2014;43(5):279-282
Anomalous origin of the coronary artery is rare. Various complications have been reported in patients with this anomaly undergoing heart valve surgery. We describe a case of aortic valve stenosis combined with an anomalous origin of the left coronary artery. An 84-year-old man with exertional dyspnea was referred for surgical treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis. Coronary angiography and computed tomography of the coronary artery revealed a coronary arterial anomaly : the left anterior descending coronary artery originated as a branch of the right coronary artery, and the left circumflex artery separately originated from the right coronary sinus and extended behind the aortic annulus. To prevent injury to the anomalous circumflex artery during surgery, the artery was separated from the fatty tissue around the aortic annulus and dissected free from the aortic wall before the performance of transverse aortotomy. The coronary artery exhibited a single orifice that was significantly enlarged. Whether antegrade infusion of the cardioplegic solution could be achieved was difficult to determine. To perform the retrograde infusion, the catheter tip was inserted directly into the coronary sinus from the epicardium because the orifice in the right atrium was lattice-like. Aortic valve replacement was successfully performed with supra-annular prosthesis insertion using a 19-mm Mosaic porcine valve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The postoperative course was uneventful. When aortic valve replacement is performed for patients with an anomalous coronary artery, careful performance of operative procedures and postoperative observation are considered important for the prevention of specific perioperative complications, such as intraoperative coronary injury or postoperative myocardial ischemic events in patients with an anomalous left circumflex artery.
4.Efforts and Challenges in Implementing an In-Hospital Rapid Response System at Our Hospital
Toru MIZUMOTO ; Sadahiro KUBO ; Akihiko TABUCHI ; Satoshi TERANISHI ; Akiko TANIGUCHI ; Makoto SUGIURA ; Shinji ISHIKAWA ; Shinya YAMADA ; Mami SUZUKI ; Satomi SAEKI ; Kanoko HAMAISHI ; Kenichi YAMADA ; Yasuhiko HOSONO ; Megumi YOSHINAGA ; Masahito WATARAI
Journal of the Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2025;73(5):425-433
Even within a hospital, the prognosis after a cardiac arrest is extremely poor if intervention starts only after the event; thus, early recognition and intervention is crucial to reduce inhospital cardiac arrests. This paper aims to assess the results of in-clinic surveys conducted for the implementation of the Rapid Response System (RRS) at our hospital and changes in awareness after awareness initiatives. Excluding the neonatal intensive care unit, all wards were targeted for implementation, with the creation of criteria for requesting the RRS and hospital-wide awareness initiatives. Four items were defined for the request criteria—namely, (1) respiration, (2) circulation, (3) state of consciousness, and (4) others (any concerns)—with a request being warranted if any one of these criteria was met. A pre-awareness survey revealed that respiratory rates were recorded only 6.9% of the time on average, indicating inadequate observation of respiratory rates across all wards. In response to this issue, we announced that respiratory status should be observed at least once a day, which resulted in the recording rate improving to 68.2% after 2 months. Survey results before and after the awareness initiatives among doctors and nurses showed a significant increase in RRS awareness. The percentage of nurses who answered “well aware” or “somewhat aware” increased from 34.8% to 77.6%, and from 63.4% to 88.0% among doctors. However, while the introduction of the RRS was relatively well-received by nurses struggling with on-site responses, some doctors questioned the necessity of the RRS. Upon implementation, it is important to make it known that it is a hospital-wide effort. Simplifying and thoroughly utilizing the request criteria can lead to early recognition of abnormalities. Since it is not easy to gain doctors’ understanding, it is necessary to listen to the needs and requests of each department and patiently continue awareness activities before implementation