Double drainage sites from a common venous confluence of the pulmonary veins of a mixed total anomalous pulmonary venous connection is a rare condition that is called a “double connection.” There have been very few reports of reoperation for minor drainage of a double connection. A 28-year-old male with double connection type (Ia: major drainage + IIa: minor drainage) mixed total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (TAPVC) was referred to our institution. He had undergone TAPVC type Ia (major drainage) repair at the age of 1 year. Postoperative enhanced computed tomography showed residual TAPVC IIa (minor drainage) at the age of 15 years. Therefore, the definitive diagnosis was double connection-type mixed TAPVC. Residual shunt gradually increased, and cardiac catheterization revealed an increased pulmonary blood flow/systemic blood flow ratio. Echocardiography showed enlarged shunt vessel and mild tricuspid regurgitation. Catheter intervention was considered too risky and, therefore, we performed patch closure of the residual shunt through a right atriotomy. The postoperative course was uneventful, and follow-up computed tomography showed shrinkage of the shunt vessel without any thromboembolic events.

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS), which is characterized by facial edema and congestion of the head, upper extremities, and neck, is a life-threatening oncologic emergency. Although a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy has been considered as the standard treatment for SVCS, stent implantation to the superior vena cava (SVC) has been recently developed to alleviate edema or dyspnea caused by SVCS. On the other hand, stent implantation to the SVC requires skilled interventional cardiologists or radiologists. In general, those specialists reside in university hospitals or large hospitals in an urban area. In this case report, an 86-year-old man underwent stent implantation to a stenosed SVC in a rural area. Because the patient refused the transfer to the core, urban hospital, we invited a skilled interventional cardiologist from the core hospital and performed stent implantation to the SVC in a small, rural hospital. It is generally difficult to perform stent implantation for SVCS in a small hospital, because skilled operators in the field of interventional cardiology or radiology do not usually perform operations in smaller facilities. Our case indicates the importance of cooperation between rural generalists and urban specialists.