BACKGROUND: This analysis presents patient-reported outcomes of breast augmentation procedures performed in Singapore using an inframammary fold incision and the “5 Ps” best practice principles for breast augmentation. These data are the first of their kind in Southeast Asian patients. METHODS: Through a retrospective chart review, patients who underwent primary breast augmentation with anatomical form-stable silicone gel breast implants using an inframammary fold incision were followed for ≥6 months postoperatively. The BREAST-Q Augmentation Module (scores standardized to 0 [worst] – 100 [best]) and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS; 1 [normal skin] to 10 [worst scar imaginable]) were administered. Responses were summarized using descriptive statistics. Patient-reported events were collected. RESULTS: Twenty-two Southeast Asian patients (mean age, 35.1 years) completed ≥1 postoperative BREAST-Q and POSAS assessment and were assessed 11 months to 5.5 years postoperatively. The mean postoperative BREAST-Q satisfaction with breasts and psychosocial well-being scores were 69.2 and 84.0, respectively. The mean POSAS score for their overall opinion of the scar was 4.2; the mean scores for all scar characteristics ranged from 1.2 to 4.2. Over 90% of patients (20/22) said that they would recommend the procedure. Patient complaints following surgery included anisomastia (possibly pre-existing; n=2), sensory loss at the nipple (n=2) or around the nipple (n=3), scarring (n=4), and slight capsular contracture (n=1). No patients required reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Southeast Asian patients reported high long-term satisfaction scores on the BREAST-Q scale and with their scar characteristics following breast augmentation using an inframammary fold incision, and nearly all said they would recommend this procedure. No reoperations were necessary in patients assessed for up to 5.5 years postoperatively.
Asia, Southeastern ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group* ; Breast Implants ; Breast* ; Cicatrix ; Contracture ; Female ; Humans ; Mammaplasty ; Nipples ; Patient Satisfaction ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Silicon ; Silicones ; Singapore

Objective:To assess the real-world patient satisfaction with the outcomes in Chinese patients who received HYC-24/HYC-24+ for the treatment of moderate to severe nasolabial folds (NLF).Methods:This study was a prospective, observational, multicenter, real-world cohort study in which patients accepted treatment with HYC-24/HYC-24+ in China during a period from August 2018 to August 2020 at Beijing Lidu Medical Beauty Hospital, Hangzhou Yanshu Yuerong Medical Aesthetic Clinic, and Guangzhou Yuexiu Plastic Surgery Hospital and were followed up for up to 1 year. Patients were adults aged 18 to 65 years with moderate to severe NLF who had not received cosmetic treatment for NLF within 6 months prior to study enrollment. Post-treatment study visits were conducted at Months 1, 6, 9, and 12, but only Months 6 and 9 were required visits. The primary patient-reported outcomes endpoints included the FACE-Q satisfaction with outcome total score (a score from 0 to 100: a higher score indicates better outcomes and higher patient satisfaction), FACE-Q appraisal of lines - NLFs total questionnaire score mean change from baseline (a score from 0 to 100: a higher score indicates the patient was less troubled by NLF in the past week), and proportion of patients who reported that they looked younger than the actual age on the FACE-Q patient perceived age visual analog scale (VAS). Investigator-assessed endpoints included the proportion of patients with a global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) score of ≥ 1 point and the proportion of patients with an improvement in NLF severity of ≥ 1 point using the nasolabial fold severity scale (NLFSS). Statistical analyses were performed with SAS software, version 9.4. Measurement data were expressed as Mean±SD, and count data were expressed using cases(%). For both measurement and count data, P values were calculated on the difference between score values at different time points versus baseline using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results:A total of 52 subjects were enrolled and treated. Among these subjects, 7 were not included in the 6-month effectiveness analysis data set because the visit time exceeded the visit assessment window, and only 9 patients completed the 12-month visit. All patients were Chinese women, aged 26 to 62 years old, with a mean age of 40.7 years. The FACE-Q satisfaction with outcome total score was (68.76 ± 21.03) points (38-100) at Month 6, and (65.44±18.24) points (24-100) at Month 9, indicating high patient satisfaction with the treatment. The FACE-Q appraisal of lines-NLFs total score was (42.4±15.1) points (10-69) at baseline, (76.9±20.6) points (36-100) at Month 6, and (74.2±16.7) points (36-100) at Month 9, both significantly higher than the baseline scores (both P<0.01). The mean change from baseline in the FACE-Q appraisal of lines-NLFs total scores at Month 6 and Month 9 were 34.9 and 31.8 points, respectively, indicating the disturbance caused by NLF was relatively mild after treatment. The proportion of patients who believed they looked younger than their actual age on the FACE-Q patient perceived age VAS increased from 28.9% (15/52) at baseline to 77.8% (35/45) at Month 6, and 73.1% (38/52 ) at Month 9. The differences were all statistically significant compared to baseline ( P <0.01). At each post-baseline visit, all patients had ≥ 1-point improvement on the GAIS scale, indicating an improvement in patient NLF appearance in the investigators’ opinion. In terms of the NLFSS assessment, 97.8% (44/45) and 82.7% (43/52) of patients achieved a ≥ 1-point improvement on the NLFSS at Months 6 and 9, respectively. No adverse events were reported during the study. Conclusion:In a real-world setting, after the administration of HYC-24/HYC-24+ to Chinese patients, the patients were satisfied with the outcomes based on validated questionnaires. The patients also reported looking younger than their actual age and being less disturbed by NLF. Clinician-reported outcomes were consistent with patient-reported outcomes, indicating improvement in NLF.

Objective:To assess the real-world patient satisfaction with the outcomes in Chinese patients who received HYC-24/HYC-24+ for the treatment of moderate to severe nasolabial folds (NLF).Methods:This study was a prospective, observational, multicenter, real-world cohort study in which patients accepted treatment with HYC-24/HYC-24+ in China during a period from August 2018 to August 2020 at Beijing Lidu Medical Beauty Hospital, Hangzhou Yanshu Yuerong Medical Aesthetic Clinic, and Guangzhou Yuexiu Plastic Surgery Hospital and were followed up for up to 1 year. Patients were adults aged 18 to 65 years with moderate to severe NLF who had not received cosmetic treatment for NLF within 6 months prior to study enrollment. Post-treatment study visits were conducted at Months 1, 6, 9, and 12, but only Months 6 and 9 were required visits. The primary patient-reported outcomes endpoints included the FACE-Q satisfaction with outcome total score (a score from 0 to 100: a higher score indicates better outcomes and higher patient satisfaction), FACE-Q appraisal of lines - NLFs total questionnaire score mean change from baseline (a score from 0 to 100: a higher score indicates the patient was less troubled by NLF in the past week), and proportion of patients who reported that they looked younger than the actual age on the FACE-Q patient perceived age visual analog scale (VAS). Investigator-assessed endpoints included the proportion of patients with a global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) score of ≥ 1 point and the proportion of patients with an improvement in NLF severity of ≥ 1 point using the nasolabial fold severity scale (NLFSS). Statistical analyses were performed with SAS software, version 9.4. Measurement data were expressed as Mean±SD, and count data were expressed using cases(%). For both measurement and count data, P values were calculated on the difference between score values at different time points versus baseline using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results:A total of 52 subjects were enrolled and treated. Among these subjects, 7 were not included in the 6-month effectiveness analysis data set because the visit time exceeded the visit assessment window, and only 9 patients completed the 12-month visit. All patients were Chinese women, aged 26 to 62 years old, with a mean age of 40.7 years. The FACE-Q satisfaction with outcome total score was (68.76 ± 21.03) points (38-100) at Month 6, and (65.44±18.24) points (24-100) at Month 9, indicating high patient satisfaction with the treatment. The FACE-Q appraisal of lines-NLFs total score was (42.4±15.1) points (10-69) at baseline, (76.9±20.6) points (36-100) at Month 6, and (74.2±16.7) points (36-100) at Month 9, both significantly higher than the baseline scores (both P<0.01). The mean change from baseline in the FACE-Q appraisal of lines-NLFs total scores at Month 6 and Month 9 were 34.9 and 31.8 points, respectively, indicating the disturbance caused by NLF was relatively mild after treatment. The proportion of patients who believed they looked younger than their actual age on the FACE-Q patient perceived age VAS increased from 28.9% (15/52) at baseline to 77.8% (35/45) at Month 6, and 73.1% (38/52 ) at Month 9. The differences were all statistically significant compared to baseline ( P <0.01). At each post-baseline visit, all patients had ≥ 1-point improvement on the GAIS scale, indicating an improvement in patient NLF appearance in the investigators’ opinion. In terms of the NLFSS assessment, 97.8% (44/45) and 82.7% (43/52) of patients achieved a ≥ 1-point improvement on the NLFSS at Months 6 and 9, respectively. No adverse events were reported during the study. Conclusion:In a real-world setting, after the administration of HYC-24/HYC-24+ to Chinese patients, the patients were satisfied with the outcomes based on validated questionnaires. The patients also reported looking younger than their actual age and being less disturbed by NLF. Clinician-reported outcomes were consistent with patient-reported outcomes, indicating improvement in NLF.