PURPOSE: The authors report a case of bilateral simultaneous central retinal vein occlusion caused by Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia. CASE SUMMARY: A 65-year-old man presented to our department complaining of decreased visual acuity for the duration of about 6 months. On his initial visit, best-corrected visual acuity was 0.02 in the right eye and 0.06 in the left eye. Based on the findings of a funduscopic examination, the patient had bilateral diffuse retinal hemorrhages, dilated tortuous veins, and macular edema. He had experienced recurrent spontaneous epistaxis 6 months previously and had undergone treatments such as intravitreal bevacizumab injection and intravitreal dexamethasone implantation at another hospital. Laboratory tests at that hospital showed anemia and hyperproteinemia, for which he was referred to our hemato-oncology department. Bone marrow biopsy was consistent with Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma, and he was treated with systemic chemotherapy. One year after the systemic chemotherapy, his best-corrected visual acuity was 0.15 in the right eye and 0.6 in the left eye. Funduscopy showed decreased bilateral retinal hemorrhages and macular edema. CONCLUSIONS: When simultaneous bilateral central retinal vein occlusion occurs in a patient with no other underlying disease such as hypertension or diabetes, it might be a sign of serum hyperviscosity, and there should be a very high level of suspicion for presence or progression of systemic disease. If such a disease is properly and timely diagnosed, effective early systemic evaluation and therapy can be administered, and it is important to have initial general treatment as well as ophthalmic treatment.
Aged ; Anemia ; Bevacizumab ; Biopsy ; Bone Marrow ; Dexamethasone ; Drug Therapy ; Epistaxis ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Lymphoma ; Macular Edema ; Retinal Hemorrhage ; Retinal Vein* ; Veins ; Visual Acuity ; Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia*

Diabetic macular edema is one of the most common causes of visual acuity impairment in adults. Various treatment modalities are currently used. They include laser therapy, intravitreal or periocular injection of steroid, intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, and pars plana vitrectomy. Introduction of newer therapeutic agents, such as ranibizumab and aflibercept has changed the paradigm of treatment approaches for diabetic macular edema. However, traditional treatment methods, such as laser photocoagulation and vitrectomy, are still being used effectively in certain situations. Each treatment modality has its own unique mode of action, and has advantages and disadvantages at the same time. Given multiple mechanisms are involved in the development of diabetic macular edema, a combination treatment approach is often employed rather than using only one of the treatment modalities. In this review, treatment outcomes of each approach are summarized and combination approaches are discussed.
Adult ; Bevacizumab ; Dexamethasone ; Endothelial Growth Factors ; Humans ; Injections, Intraocular ; Intravitreal Injections ; Laser Therapy ; Light Coagulation ; Macular Edema* ; Ranibizumab ; Visual Acuity ; Vitrectomy

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on real-world treatment patterns for diabetic macular edema (DME) in Korea. In this study, we investigated DME treatment patterns from 2009 to 2014 and the impact of baseline treatment on healthcare resource utilization and visual acuity (VA) outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort chart review of DME patients treated at 11 hospital ophthalmology clinics between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2013 was conducted. We collected data on demographics, healthcare resource utilization (clinic visits, treatment visits, and visits for ocular investigations), distribution of DME treatments, and VA. RESULTS: Overall, 522 DME patients (men, 55.2%; mean age, 59 years; mean HbA1c [n = 209], 8.4%) with 842 DME eyes were evaluated. For all treatments, healthcare resource utilization was significantly higher during the first 6 months versus months 7–12, year 2, or year 3 (P ≤ 0.001), but was highest for patients whose first treatment was an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment (visits/quarter; anti-VEGF, 1.9; corticosteroids, 1.7; laser, 1.4). Use of macular laser therapy decreased (44% to 8%), whereas use of anti-VEGF injections increased (44% to 69%) during the study period. However, VA improvement was not commensurate with healthcare resource utilization of anti-VEGF treatment (mean VA gain, 2.7 letters). CONCLUSION: A trend toward increasing use of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for DME treatment was observed in Korea. However, the frequency of dosing and monitoring was lower in clinical practice versus major clinical trials, which may have led to the less-than-favorable improvements in visual outcomes.
Adrenal Cortex Hormones ; Cohort Studies ; Delivery of Health Care ; Demography ; Endothelial Growth Factors ; Humans ; Intravitreal Injections ; Korea ; Laser Therapy ; Macular Edema ; Ophthalmology ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' ; Retrospective Studies ; Visual Acuity

Bietti crystalline retinal dystrophy is a rare, inherited disorder whose hallmark is the presence of retinal crystal deposits associated with later chorioretinal degeneration. This condition may rarely be complicated by the development of cystoid macular oedema leading to rapid visual decline. Currently, treatment options for this complication of Bietti dystrophy are limited and the visual prognosis is poor. Here, we present a case of cystoid macular oedema associated with Bietti dystrophy that was successfully diagnosed using multimodal imaging techniques including optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography. These modalities confirmed the diagnosis of macular oedema and excluded other possible causes of oedema such as choroidal neovascularisation. In this patient, cystoid macular oedema was resolved with oral acetazolamide therapy, a treatment that has not been previously reported in this context. Acetazolamide treatment resulted in oedema resolution and improvement in visual function, and can be considered a therapeutic option for other patients with Bietti dystrophy who develop cystoid macular oedema.
Acetazolamide/*administration & dosage ; Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Corneal Dystrophies, Hereditary/*drug therapy/pathology ; Diuretics/*administration & dosage ; Humans ; Macular Edema/*drug therapy/pathology ; Male ; Retinal Diseases/*drug therapy/pathology ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: To compare pain scores of patients during intravitreal 27-gauge bevacizumab and 30-gauge ranibizumab injection procedures. METHODS: Seventy eyes of 70 patients who had not previously undergone intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included in this study. Thirty-five patients received ranibizumab and 35 patients received bevacizumab. The diagnoses of the patients were: 27 age related macular degeneration, 15 diabetic macular edema, 9 diabetic vitreous hemorrhage, 6 central retinal vein occlusion, 11 branch retinal vein occlusion and 2 central serous chorioretinopathy. Bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) was injected into the vitreous cavity using a 27-gauge needle, and ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 mL) was injected with 30-gauge needle. Patients were asked just after the injection to rate their perceived pain during the injection using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable/worst pain). The average of these scores was used as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The VAS pain scores in the ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were 1.06 +/- 0.91 (range, 0 to 3) and 1.94 +/- 1.55 (range, 0 to 7), respectively, a significant difference (p = 0.005). Patients <65 and > or =65 years of age in both the ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were then compared. For patients <65, there was a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.003). However, for patients > or =65 years, there was not a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.238). Female and male patients in both ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were also compared. For female patients, there was a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.016), although not for male patients (p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-gauge intravitreal injection is more comfortable than 27-gauge injection. Injection of bevacizumab with 30-gauge needle syringes may be more tolerable for patients.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Angiogenesis Inhibitors/*administration & dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/*administration & dosage ; Bevacizumab/*administration & dosage ; Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy/physiopathology ; Female ; Humans ; *Intravitreal Injections ; Macular Degeneration/drug therapy/physiopathology ; Macular Edema/drug therapy/physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Ranibizumab/*administration & dosage ; Retinal Vein Occlusion/drug therapy/physiopathology

PURPOSE: To compare pain scores of patients during intravitreal 27-gauge bevacizumab and 30-gauge ranibizumab injection procedures. METHODS: Seventy eyes of 70 patients who had not previously undergone intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included in this study. Thirty-five patients received ranibizumab and 35 patients received bevacizumab. The diagnoses of the patients were: 27 age related macular degeneration, 15 diabetic macular edema, 9 diabetic vitreous hemorrhage, 6 central retinal vein occlusion, 11 branch retinal vein occlusion and 2 central serous chorioretinopathy. Bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) was injected into the vitreous cavity using a 27-gauge needle, and ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 mL) was injected with 30-gauge needle. Patients were asked just after the injection to rate their perceived pain during the injection using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable/worst pain). The average of these scores was used as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The VAS pain scores in the ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were 1.06 +/- 0.91 (range, 0 to 3) and 1.94 +/- 1.55 (range, 0 to 7), respectively, a significant difference (p = 0.005). Patients <65 and > or =65 years of age in both the ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were then compared. For patients <65, there was a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.003). However, for patients > or =65 years, there was not a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.238). Female and male patients in both ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were also compared. For female patients, there was a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.016), although not for male patients (p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-gauge intravitreal injection is more comfortable than 27-gauge injection. Injection of bevacizumab with 30-gauge needle syringes may be more tolerable for patients.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Angiogenesis Inhibitors/*administration & dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/*administration & dosage ; Bevacizumab/*administration & dosage ; Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy/physiopathology ; Female ; Humans ; *Intravitreal Injections ; Macular Degeneration/drug therapy/physiopathology ; Macular Edema/drug therapy/physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Ranibizumab/*administration & dosage ; Retinal Vein Occlusion/drug therapy/physiopathology

A 54-year-old female patient who had been undergoing anti-cancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy for seven years after surgery for left breast cancer visited our clinic for visual disturbance in the right eye at nine months after paclitaxel administration. The best-corrected visual acuity was 0.5 in the right eye and 1.0 in the left eye. The patient was diagnosed with maculopathy due to paclitaxel administration based on the finding of cystoid macular edema in the right eye on fundus examination and optical coherence tomography; however, no leakage was detected on fluorescein angiography. Thus, drug replacement was planned. On the other hand, no abnormal finding was observed in the left eye. However, as the anti-cancer effect of paclitaxel is significant, replacing paclitaxel with another agent was not warranted; therefore, maintenance therapy with methazolamide was performed before and after administering the anti-cancer agent. Aggravation of cystoid macular edema was prevented, and vision improvement was achieved by oral maintenance therapy with methazolamide. In addition, the same fundus findings as shown in the right eye were detected in the left eye at 16 months after paclitaxel administration. After administering methazolamide, macular thickness was reduced, and vision was improved in the left eye. Paclitaxel administration was discontinued due to cutaneous metastasis from the breast cancer, and another anti-cancer agent was then administered. No subsequent cystoid macular edema has occurred.
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/*adverse effects ; Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Diuretics/*therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Macular Edema/*chemically induced/*drug therapy ; Methazolamide/*therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Paclitaxel/*adverse effects ; Visual Acuity

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy between macular laser grid (MLG) photocoagulation and MLG plus intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA; MLG+IVTA) therapy in diabetic macular edema (DME) patients. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, clinical trial was conducted of DME patients. A total of 60 eyes (54 patients) affected by DME were observed for a minimum of 6 months. Thirty eyes of 28 patients who received MLG treatment and 30 eyes of 26 patients who received the combined MLG+IVTA treatment were included in the study. Main outcome measures were BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT) as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. Additionally, the authors examined retrospectively 20 eyes of 20 patients who were treated with only IVTA and compared with the 2 groups (MLG group and MLG+IVTA group). RESULTS: Baseline BCVA was 0.53+/-0.32 and CMT was 513.9+/-55.1 microm in the MLG group. At 1 and 3 months after treatment, the MLG group showed no significant improvement of BCVA and CMT, although there was significant improvement after 6 months. In the MLG+IVTA group, the baseline BCVA was 0.59+/-0.29 and CMT was 498.2+/-19.8 microm. After treatment, significant improvement of BCVA and CMT was observed at all follow-up time periods. When comparing the MLG group with the MLG+IVTA group, the latter had better results after 1 and 3 months, although at 6 months, there was no significant difference of BCVA and CMT between the 2 groups. Additionally, the IVTA group showed more improvement than the MLG group at 1 and 3 months but showed no significant difference at 6 months. In addition, the IVTA group showed no significant difference with the MLG+IVTA group at all follow-up time periods. CONCLUSIONS: For DME patients, the combined MLG+IVTA treatment had a better therapeutic effect than the MLG treatment for improving BCVA and CMT at the early follow-up time periods. IVTA treatment alone could be an additional alternative therapeutic option to combined therapy.
Aged ; Diabetic Retinopathy/*drug therapy/pathology/physiopathology/*surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glucocorticoids/*administration & dosage ; Humans ; Injections ; *Laser Coagulation ; Macular Edema/*drug therapy/pathology/physiopathology/*surgery ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Period ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; Triamcinolone Acetonide/*administration & dosage ; Visual Acuity ; Vitreous Body

We report two cases of macular edema treated with the oral administration of furosemide. The first case presented here was a 78-year-old male patient with visual disturbance of the left eye. He had been taking an oral agent for diabetes and had chronic renal failure for 7 years. From 10 days prior to the visit, he had visual disturbance of the left eye accompanied by systemic edema. There were no specific findings in the anterior segment, but sub-retinal fluid was observed in the left fundus. Macular edema was observed on fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography; therefore, the oral administration of furosemide was initiated. After seven days, the sub-retinal fluid disappeared. The second case was a 43-year-old female patient with visual disturbance of the left eye who had been taking hypoglycemic agents for diabetes for 13 years. There were no specific findings in the anterior segment, but flame-shaped retinal hemorrhages were scattered over both posterior poles, neovascularization was observed in the left eye, and, of particular note, sub-retinal fluid was detected in the macula of the left eye. Macular edema was also observed on fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography, and oral administration of furosemide was initiated. After 3 weeks, the macular edema had significantly decreased.
Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Aged ; Diabetes Complications/diagnosis/*drug therapy ; Diuretics/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use ; Female ; Fluorescein Angiography ; Furosemide/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use ; Humans ; Macular Edema/diagnosis/*drug therapy ; Male ; Tomography, Optical Coherence

BACKGROUNDDiabetic macular edema (DME) is a common manifestation of diabetic retinopathy (DR) that forms the main cause of central visual impairment. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a single intravitreal injection of bevacizumab alone versus bevacizumab combined with triamcinolone acetonide in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODSA total of 40 eyes in 40 Chinese patients (22 male and 18 female) diagnosed with diabetic macular edema were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, consecutive study. Among them, 21 patients in group 1 were treated with intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 ml), and the other 19 patients in group 2 accepted intravitreal bavacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 ml) combined with triamcinolone acetonide (2 mg/0.05 ml). All patients were examined at baseline and followed up at 4, 6 and 12 weeks after the injection. Changes in mean best correct visual acuity (BCVA) using ETDRS chart, central retina thickness (CRT) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were focused on.

RESULTSIn group 1, mean BCVA improved from (41.76 ± 15.59) letters (baseline) to (56.24 ± 18.56) letters, (52.57 ± 12.31) letters and (48.41 ± 17.90) letters at 4, 6 and 12 weeks post-injection, respectively (P = 0.004, P = 0.011 and P = 0.026, respectively). Mean CRT decreased from (525.76 ± 184.10) µm (baseline) to (270.33 ± 202.67)µm, (303.12 ± 168.43) µm and (402.26 ± 196.21) µm, respectively (P = 0.009, P = 0.016 and P = 0.030, respectively). In group 2, mean BCVA improved from (39.89 ± 12.27) letters (baseline) to (55.31 ± 19.27) letters, (51.25 ± 13.48) letters and (46.97 ± 16.23) letters at 4, 6 and 12 weeks after injection, respectively (P = 0.003, P = 0.010 and P = 0.027, respectively). Mean CRT decreased from (554.50 ± 169.05) µm (baseline) to (292.76 ± 196.05) µm, (323.46 ± 164.05) µm and (426.38 ± 169.05) µm, respectively (P = 0.009, P = 0.014 and P = 0.028, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between these two groups with regard to mean BCVA (F = 1.602, P = 0.216) and CRT (F = 0.412, P = 0.526). At 12 weeks after the injection, 11 of the patients in group 1 and nine patients in group 2 appeared recurrent macular edema and needed repeat injections. There was one patient in group 2 appeared transient intraocular pressure increases.

CONCLUSIONSIntravitreal injection of bevacizumab combined with/without triamcinolone acetonide had a beneficial effect on DME. However, the significant effect was not permanent. Our results showed that no significant differences were detected between intravitreal bevacizumab combined with/without triamcinolone acetonide for the eyes with diabetic macular edema in Chinese patients.

Adult ; Aged ; Antibodies, Monoclonal ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; Bevacizumab ; Diabetic Retinopathy ; drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; therapeutic use ; Intravitreal Injections ; Macular Edema ; drug therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Treatment Outcome ; Triamcinolone Acetonide ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use